Accident and GDPR

Author
Discussion

boyse7en

Original Poster:

6,738 posts

166 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Friend of mine had an accident last week when a car pulled out of a junction in front of her. She was on a bicycle and hit the front wing, went over the bonnet and landed on the floor the other side.
Someone called the emergency services and Police and ambulance arrived and took her off to A&E for checking over. Fortunately nothing broken but she is pretty bashed up and can't work (she's a gardener) as at the moment she can hardly walk.
She has contacted the police asking for the driver's details so she can put in a claim for her bike (frame is broken in half) but has been told be that they can't tell her due to GDPR. Is that right? You are supposed to exchange details after an accident, but she couldn't at the time. She's a bit stuck at the moment on how to progress

Mojooo

12,743 posts

181 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
Friend of mine had an accident last week when a car pulled out of a junction in front of her. She was on a bicycle and hit the front wing, went over the bonnet and landed on the floor the other side.
Someone called the emergency services and Police and ambulance arrived and took her off to A&E for checking over. Fortunately nothing broken but she is pretty bashed up and can't work (she's a gardener) as at the moment she can hardly walk.
She has contacted the police asking for the driver's details so she can put in a claim for her bike (frame is broken in half) but has been told be that they can't tell her due to GDPR. Is that right? You are supposed to exchange details after an accident, but she couldn't at the time. She's a bit stuck at the moment on how to progress
There is a gateway under GDPR for data to be obtained for legal proceedings. The problem is its an optional gateway so they don't HAVE to give it. You would think they would to be helpful..

Cudd Wudd

1,089 posts

126 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
She can ask for just the VRM and then submit a request here:

https://www.askmid.com/askmidenquiry.aspx

Problem being often the police won't release even a VRM due to 'data protection'...

Make it clear the request is made for the VRM is purely to identify the insurer for the damages claim. It can depend who picks up the request to deal with though, unfortunately.

Forester1965

1,535 posts

4 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
In these circumstances the driver is legally obliged to provide his details (including VRM and insurance) to anyone who has reasonable grounds to require them, including insurance (s170 Road Traffic Act). No idea what the Police are playing at here?

Simpo Two

85,529 posts

266 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
A few years ago a driver pulled out in front of me and wrote my car off. Two weeks later a letter from the police arrived with the driver's details - but they advised I didn't prosecute as they were already dealing with it.


If the OP has a case then by withholding details and preventing action, perhaps Plod is obstructing the course of justice...?

Edited by Simpo Two on Saturday 20th April 18:21

pocketspring

5,319 posts

22 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Does her home insurance provide legal cover?

Dingu

3,796 posts

31 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
A few years ago a driver pulled out in front of me and wrote my car off. Two weeks later a letter from the police arrived with the driver's details - but they advised I didn't prosecute as they were already dealing with it.


If the OP has a case then by withholding details and preventing action, perhaps Plod is obstructing the course of justice...?

Edited by Simpo Two on Saturday 20th April 18:21
Insurance claim =/= course of justice.

Simpo Two

85,529 posts

266 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Dingu said:
Insurance claim =/= course of justice.
True but:

Forester1965 said:
In these circumstances the driver is legally obliged to provide his details (including VRM and insurance) to anyone who has reasonable grounds to require them, including insurance (s170 Road Traffic Act).

Nibbles_bits

1,089 posts

40 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
In these circumstances the driver is legally obliged to provide his details (including VRM and insurance) to anyone who has reasonable grounds to require them, including insurance (s170 Road Traffic Act). No idea what the Police are playing at here?
Yes. The driver, having not given their details to someone at the scene has to provide their details to the police.

The Police do not have to provide those details to the other driver/person.

Your insurance company can apply to the police for the information of the other driver, and they will provide it to them.

Nibbles_bits

1,089 posts

40 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Sorry OP, but we've been given explicit instructions.

We're no longer to share the details of drivers, vehicles or insurance where S170 hasn't been complied with at the roadside.

If you require the details of a driver/vehicle and they were exchanged by that driver at the time of the collision, you'll need your insurance company to request those details from the local Police Force.

That's GDRP for you (and the fact that insurance companies were getting their customers to ask for the details so that they didn't have to pay the fee)

ridds

8,222 posts

245 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
Forester1965 said:
In these circumstances the driver is legally obliged to provide his details (including VRM and insurance) to anyone who has reasonable grounds to require them, including insurance (s170 Road Traffic Act). No idea what the Police are playing at here?
Yes. The driver, having not given their details to someone at the scene has to provide their details to the police.

The Police do not have to provide those details to the other driver/person.

Your insurance company can apply to the police for the information of the other driver, and they will provide it to them.
When the claimant was on a bicycle?

OP, I would suggest obtaining the Crime Reference Number for the incident, then if they have house insurance use that route to obtain the other parties details.

Or, instruct one of the cash for crash agencies to help. Although without a hire car to make their profit, this may be tricky.

I'm quite astonished that GDPR prevents the Police from providing, at a minimum, the details of the insurance company of the other party. Pure madness.silly

Nibbles_bits

1,089 posts

40 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Whether the claimant was on a bike or not makes no difference.

The police won't provide them with the details of the vehicle involved.

Nibbles_bits

1,089 posts

40 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
A few years ago a driver pulled out in front of me and wrote my car off. Two weeks later a letter from the police arrived with the driver's details - but they advised I didn't prosecute as they were already dealing with it.


If the OP has a case then by withholding details and preventing action, perhaps Plod is obstructing the course of justice...?

Edited by Simpo Two on Saturday 20th April 18:21
Nope, not obstructing justice.

There are avenues the OP can take to obtain the details, just asking for them isn't one of them.

Forester1965

1,535 posts

4 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
Sorry OP, but we've been given explicit instructions.

We're no longer to share the details of drivers, vehicles or insurance where S170 hasn't been complied with at the roadside.

If you require the details of a driver/vehicle and they were exchanged by that driver at the time of the collision, you'll need your insurance company to request those details from the local Police Force.

That's GDRP for you (and the fact that insurance companies were getting their customers to ask for the details so that they didn't have to pay the fee)
Last time I looked cyclists and pedestrians don't routinely have their own insurance.

If you're saying the Police usually charge a fee to insurers for giving out the details, it sounds more like it's to do with the Police ringfencing an income stream than GDPR. What difference does it make under GDPR if the 3rd party you hand the details to is the injured party or their representative?

Aretnap

1,664 posts

152 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
You mention a hospital visit, time off work and the fact that she can still barely walk so it sounds like there is a personal injury claim to be made as well as just damage to the bike In which case she should be able to find a solicitor to represent her - either check whether she has legal cover on her home insurance, or Google a no win no fee firm. I would presume that a solicitor would be used to extracting drivers details from the police.

Peter911

483 posts

158 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
It’s just another police money making scam to make insurets pay for a police report. Been happening for over s decade or more.

Nothing to do with GDPR.

Disgusting

Forester1965

1,535 posts

4 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
The relevant guidance to Police forces is here;

https://library.college.police.uk/docs/NPCC/Police...


Zigster

1,653 posts

145 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
Sorry OP, but we've been given explicit instructions.

We're no longer to share the details of drivers, vehicles or insurance where S170 hasn't been complied with at the roadside.

If you require the details of a driver/vehicle and they were exchanged by that driver at the time of the collision, you'll need your insurance company to request those details from the local Police Force.

That's GDRP for you (and the fact that insurance companies were getting their customers to ask for the details so that they didn't have to pay the fee)
I’m struggling to understand how you can’t provide relevant details to the injured party but you can to an insurance company. That doesn’t sound like a GDPR reason to me.

pocketspring

5,319 posts

22 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Zigster said:
Nibbles_bits said:
Sorry OP, but we've been given explicit instructions.

We're no longer to share the details of drivers, vehicles or insurance where S170 hasn't been complied with at the roadside.

If you require the details of a driver/vehicle and they were exchanged by that driver at the time of the collision, you'll need your insurance company to request those details from the local Police Force.

That's GDRP for you (and the fact that insurance companies were getting their customers to ask for the details so that they didn't have to pay the fee)
I’m struggling to understand how you can’t provide relevant details to the injured party but you can to an insurance company. That doesn’t sound like a GDPR reason to me.
You're quite correct. It's a simple case of police not wanting to get involved. GDPR has absolutely nothing to do with we've got details so not allowed to give them out. It's just a great excuse for companies to hide behind.
Maybe the OPs gardener can instruct a solicitor.

BertBert

19,070 posts

212 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
Yes. The driver, having not given their details to someone at the scene has to provide their details to the police.

The Police do not have to provide those details to the other driver/person.

Your insurance company can apply to the police for the information of the other driver, and they will provide it to them.
What happens when you don't have an insurance company?