RE: Apex readies XKR for GT racing

RE: Apex readies XKR for GT racing

Monday 12th March 2007

Apex readies XKR for GT racing

Jaguar's big coupe set to race


none
Apex Motorsport's Jaguar XKR
Apex Motorsport's Jaguar XKR

Apex Motorsport’s brand new Jaguar XKR GT3 has completed the first two of its planned pre-season test sessions.

It's also re-united one of sports car racing’s most successful drivers with the Jaguar marque.

Andy Wallace, winner of the 1988 24 Hours of Le Mans, as well as countless other races with the TWR-built Jaguar XJR range of the 80s and 90s, was behind the wheel of the new sportscar for its first running laps at both the recent official FIA test sessions in Monza, Italy and Nogaro in South Western France.

While running time was hampered by new car teething troubles, Wallace gained a very positive first impression. “It’s a lovely car to drive, nicely put together, and will be perfect from a customer’s point of view. It’s extremely stable, and doesn’t do anything odd or unexpected, plus it sounds good and is absolutely beautiful.”

Apex Motorsport team principal Richard Lloyd acknowledged that there was still a lot of work to do before the car makes its racing debut at Silverstone on 5-6 May.

“To be in Monza for the official Championship launch at the end of February was, for us, like a victory in itself. The car ran for the very first time so we viewed it as just a shakedown. Since then we’ve done the two days at Nogaro and, in spite of not much track time, we learnt a lot about the car so feel that significant progress has been made.

“We built this car in only three months, so it was a great challenge to get to this stage. We would have liked more time, of course, but we are where we are – no excuses. We know from the last test that the car responds incredibly well to suspension and set up changes, and next time out we will get the chance to put the car through its paces at speed so we can get some feedback on the engine performance.”

Apex Motorsport’s next test dates have not yet been finalised, but the car will likely be seen clocking up the miles on a British race track in the very near future with a fresh engine and exhaust system.

Author
Discussion

purple haze

Original Poster:

259 posts

225 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
It will be good to see the big cat back on the track again

sprinter885

11,550 posts

228 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
Yep. It does look good & agree with above.Good luck to Richard Lloyd & teamthumbup

scotty_917

1,034 posts

223 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
Is that wing legal?....seems to be wider than the rear extremeties of the car!

Good to see Jaguar back though...now being released from the shackles on account of the Aston Martin sale!

GCW

18 posts

259 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
scotty_917 said:
Is that wing legal?....seems to be wider than the rear extremeties of the car!

Good to see Jaguar back though...now being released from the shackles on account of the Aston Martin sale!


What's the betting it is beating the DB9s within 12 months?



groomi

9,317 posts

244 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
GCW said:
What's the betting it is beating the DB9s within 12 months?


Highly unlikely as they're in different classes.

ridds

8,222 posts

245 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
What a GT3 DB9?

Not the DBRS9's which are the GT1 cars.


Edited by ridds on Monday 12th March 22:38

guyh

640 posts

212 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
ridds said:
What a GT3 DB9?

Not the DBRS9's which are the GT1 cars.


Edited by ridds on Monday 12th March 22:38



DBR9 = GT1
DBRS9 = GT3

jonnnny28

5 posts

207 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
ridds said:
What a GT3 DB9?

Not the DBRS9's which are the GT1 cars.


Edited by ridds on Monday 12th March 22:38


ha! I love it when know it alls get it rite wink wink

Calorus

4,081 posts

225 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
That's an ugly bugger, ne?

One of the most aesthetically unsuccesful conversions in GT3.

Calorus

4,081 posts

225 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
GCW said:
scotty_917 said:
Is that wing legal?....seems to be wider than the rear extremeties of the car!

Good to see Jaguar back though...now being released from the shackles on account of the Aston Martin sale!


What's the betting it is beating the DB9s within 12 months?


Not likely: the DBRS9 was slow and, relatively mediocre until the addition of the GT1 Aero pack. Since Apex have not the skill, equipment or finances to do something similar, the gulf will only grow.

andy97

4,703 posts

223 months

Wednesday 14th March 2007
quotequote all
[quote=Calorus
Not likely: the DBRS9 was slow and, relatively mediocre until the addition of the GT1 Aero pack. Since Apex have not the skill, equipment or finances to do something similar, the gulf will only grow.
[/quote]

A bit harsh on a team that succesfully ran the Audi A4 in BTCC & helped with the design, build and operation of the Bentley at Sebring and Le Mans. Some team staff are also experienced engineering the Audi R10.

Calorus

4,081 posts

225 months

Wednesday 14th March 2007
quotequote all
andy97 said:
Calorus said:

Not likely: the DBRS9 was slow and, relatively mediocre until the addition of the GT1 Aero pack. Since Apex have not the skill, equipment or finances to do something similar, the gulf will only grow.


A bit harsh on a team that succesfully ran the Audi A4 in BTCC & helped with the design, build and operation of the Bentley at Sebring and Le Mans. Some team staff are also experienced engineering the Audi R10.


On each and every one of those projects, they help, or assisted or raced - the A$ was predominantly the ABT design, the Bentley was still primarily handled from Wolfsburg, and so was the R10.


Edited by Calorus on Wednesday 14th March 12:38

ahonen

5,017 posts

280 months

Wednesday 14th March 2007
quotequote all
Calorus said:
andy97 said:
Calorus said:

Not likely: the DBRS9 was slow and, relatively mediocre until the addition of the GT1 Aero pack. Since Apex have not the skill, equipment or finances to do something similar, the gulf will only grow.


A bit harsh on a team that succesfully ran the Audi A4 in BTCC & helped with the design, build and operation of the Bentley at Sebring and Le Mans. Some team staff are also experienced engineering the Audi R10.


On each and every one of those projects, they help, or assisted or raced - the A$ was predominantly the ABT design, the Bentley was still primarily handled from Wolfsburg, and so was the R10.


Edited by Calorus on Wednesday 14th March 12:38


Apex is a good team and Mr Lloyd has been around long enough to do a good job. The Bentley, to be fair, was designed and built at RTN in Norfolk and wasn't an Audi with a roof, as some thought at the time. Joest was involved in the final Bentley year, but by then the car was much, much better than the previous versions.

The beauty of GT3 is that it doesn't rely on car development as such - the cars are balanced by the FIA, so the engineering deficit is made up for in weights and tyre compounds/widths etc.

Calorus

4,081 posts

225 months

Wednesday 14th March 2007
quotequote all
ahonen said:
Calorus said:
andy97 said:
Calorus said:

Not likely: the DBRS9 was slow and, relatively mediocre until the addition of the GT1 Aero pack. Since Apex have not the skill, equipment or finances to do something similar, the gulf will only grow.


A bit harsh on a team that succesfully ran the Audi A4 in BTCC & helped with the design, build and operation of the Bentley at Sebring and Le Mans. Some team staff are also experienced engineering the Audi R10.


On each and every one of those projects, they help, or assisted or raced - the A$ was predominantly the ABT design, the Bentley was still primarily handled from Wolfsburg, and so was the R10.


Edited by Calorus on Wednesday 14th March 12:38


Apex is a good team and Mr Lloyd has been around long enough to do a good job. The Bentley, to be fair, was designed and built at RTN in Norfolk and wasn't an Audi with a roof, as some thought at the time. Joest was involved in the final Bentley year, but by then the car was much, much better than the previous versions.

The beauty of GT3 is that it doesn't rely on car development as such - the cars are balanced by the FIA, so the engineering deficit is made up for in weights and tyre compounds/widths etc.


Well it should be - as Prodrive showed: if you turn up ill-prepared and expect the BGT or anyone else to balance your performance up, you're going home disappointed. Even RTN's involvement made use of Audi engineers, particularly for powertrain, and Audi facilities, too.