Alfa Romeo 145...

Author
Discussion

snotrag

Original Poster:

14,464 posts

211 months

Saturday 2nd June 2007
quotequote all
... Particularly 2.0 cloverleaf...

Any good? Quick, good looking bargaintastic hot hatch with stunning good looks, and post 80's/early 90's alfa unreliability?

Or dated, never popular for a reason, ticking financial time bomb?

Discuss!

DennisTheMenace

15,603 posts

268 months

Saturday 2nd June 2007
quotequote all
is that the one that looks like a breadvan with windows ?

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

209 months

Saturday 2nd June 2007
quotequote all
Tick- Tock- Tick -Tock

snotrag

Original Poster:

14,464 posts

211 months

Sunday 3rd June 2007
quotequote all



This one. Better looking than pretty much any other hatch of that period I can think of...?

Edited by snotrag on Sunday 3rd June 00:28

Xenocide

4,286 posts

208 months

Sunday 3rd June 2007
quotequote all
Is it that low stock?

Kinky

39,574 posts

269 months

Sunday 3rd June 2007
quotequote all
There is an Alfa forum, which I'll move this to.

I used to have 2 146's (the 5-door versions) and they were brilliant cars - I loved them both.

K

Blue Tomcat

823 posts

222 months

Sunday 3rd June 2007
quotequote all
I had one a couple of cars ago - bloody fantastic to drive! Agile, quick and very fast but very fragile. If you get one, make sure that the cambelt is less than 40k old and that the tensioner and waterpump were changed at the same time. My tensioner 'let go' idling in traffic and the bill was £1600... Also, earthing faults will cause the immobiliser to assume the car is under attack and turn it into a doorstop. Many of them have a one-piece exhaust system that will cost about £700 to replace.
My current car is a normally-aspirated Rover 220 Tomcat that makes the 145 look daft.
Half leather seats, targa top and I replaced the exhaust system (including cat), polybushed the suspension and fitted a new fuel tank for less than £300.

I bought the Tomcat for £700 with a year's ticket and it leaves the couple of 145's in my area for dead...go figure!

BT


phil1979

3,549 posts

215 months

Monday 4th June 2007
quotequote all
Mine's been excellent. And very reliable to boot. Only hiccup was a severed power steering pipe. Great giggle to drive, and will be upgrading to a GTV soon, when I find the perfect one.

Can be a little pricey to maintain (plugs etc), but the components seems to last well. Have mine 4 years now, still on the same exhaust, brakes, etc etc. Wish I could buy one new.

My Dad drives a Rover.

Dave Brand

928 posts

268 months

Monday 4th June 2007
quotequote all
Blue Tomcat said:
Many of them have a one-piece exhaust system that will cost about £700 to replace.
£700? £200 would be a more realistic figure!

adamrbts

71 posts

207 months

Monday 4th June 2007
quotequote all
Dave Brand said:
Blue Tomcat said:
Many of them have a one-piece exhaust system that will cost about £700 to replace.
£700? £200 would be a more realistic figure!
Or £160!

http://www.alfaworkshop.co.uk/parts/145_Exhaust.sh...

Parts are reasonable if you stay clear of the dealers..

Cambelt is major concern as mentioned previously.. I've learned the hard way frown

Great car though..



Mave

8,208 posts

215 months

Monday 4th June 2007
quotequote all
Blue Tomcat said:
I had one a couple of cars ago - bloody fantastic to drive! Agile, quick and very fast but very fragile. If you get one, make sure that the cambelt is less than 40k old and that the tensioner and waterpump were changed at the same time. My tensioner 'let go' idling in traffic and the bill was £1600... Also, earthing faults will cause the immobiliser to assume the car is under attack and turn it into a doorstop. Many of them have a one-piece exhaust system that will cost about £700 to replace.
My current car is a normally-aspirated Rover 220 Tomcat that makes the 145 look daft.
Half leather seats, targa top and I replaced the exhaust system (including cat), polybushed the suspension and fitted a new fuel tank for less than £300.

I bought the Tomcat for £700 with a year's ticket and it leaves the couple of 145's in my area for dead...go figure!

BT

tha cambelt is a well known problem, just needs chaging at 36K miles not the hopelessly optimistic 72K. 1 piece exhaust system can be changed for £300 fully stainless, £160 for mild steel. Never heard of the alarm problem before, I suspect you were unlucky. Not saying that the 145 is a better car than aTomcat, but it's not a bad car as a rule; just that there are bad 'uns like any car.

Mave

8,208 posts

215 months

Monday 4th June 2007
quotequote all
Had mine for 117K miles, honestly the most reliable car owned yet, including heaps of Fords, Vauxhalls, a Citroen, Mazda, Peugeot, Rover, Nissan....

twinspark

462 posts

203 months

Monday 4th June 2007
quotequote all
Our 156 has largely the same engine - it's now on 120k miles and has given very little hassle (Needed a lambda and cat for the last MOT plus an aircon pip replacing last summer). Been as cheap to run as anything we've had.

I probably wouldn't buy a 145, though - the 146Ti is the same car, with a slightly more conventional 5-door body. The great thing about he Ti is that they're not only cheaper than a 145 Cloverleaf, they also tend to be better looked after.

Very nearly bought one for the wife, but it was just a bit too manic for her. She loves her Alfas, but the 145CL / 146Ti are very much like the Sud Ti - very stiff suspension, revvy, loud engine. Great cars, but not one I'd want to commute in at 7am.

One thing to watch on them is the 'Tipo rattle' from the front suspension - it's usually the anti-roll bar drop-links, but all the front bushes tend to wear out quite rapidly.

Mave

8,208 posts

215 months

Tuesday 5th June 2007
quotequote all
twinspark said:
One thing to watch on them is the 'Tipo rattle' from the front suspension - it's usually the anti-roll bar drop-links, but all the front bushes tend to wear out quite rapidly.
Agreed that some of the bushes wear. I think I paid about £15 each for the ARB bushes at 90K miles. The wishbone bushes were just on their way out at 110K, £45 each.

NJS25

446 posts

249 months

Tuesday 5th June 2007
quotequote all
Our cloverleaf has done 60000 miles (on the original cambelt) over its 11 year life, just had a new exhaust (£500 fitted!! there are different types fitted to the early cars the 'slip-on version mentioned above is not the same was originally quoted about £250 fitted for one of those)

Other problems are clock sometimes doesn't light up, rear hatch gas struts are getting tired and that's it!

Intend to get the car overhauled as for the money we will not get anything else as reliable or as much fun (the engine is lovely). Full service, overhaul suspension etc.

Other Alfa quirk to consider is the unique windscreen wipers on early cars, alfa charge a fortune for these but you make the halfords refills fit. You can also convert them to standard fit ones (as used on later cars)

If you get a good one they're great, but take care there's alot of rubbish out there too. Just be prepared to put up with the foibles (exhaust, wipers etc.)

Final tip, personally I never, ever, ever take our care to an Alfa dealership, use an independant specialist for specialist work, and a decent garage for routine stuff.

Regards, Neil

twinspark

462 posts

203 months

Tuesday 5th June 2007
quotequote all
Bloody hell, you're living on borrowed time with that cambelt.

I'd get it done *now* - in fact, I wouldn't drive it anywhere other than very carefully to the place where you can get the belt done......

Not only is it 24k miles overdue, it's also *8 years* overdue.

Believe me, it's better to pay for it to be done now rather than pay for a recon. head when it breaks.

alfa mad

219 posts

243 months

Tuesday 5th June 2007
quotequote all
You're not wrong twinspark. 60k is a bit like Russian Roulette. That said, some cars did make it to 72k- but not many. Besides, everyone now knows that Alfa ammended the belt change 36k and also specifically to include the tensioner and guide pulley, right?

Personally, I service my car every 10k and do the belt service at 40k. Variator appears good for 80k.
BTW, my sister's 1.8 16v 155 is now over 160k and going very strongly.

twinspark

462 posts

203 months

Tuesday 5th June 2007
quotequote all
I thought everyone knew - but I still see lots of 156s on eBay with broken belts. Not as many as those that have knocking big ends because some idiot who didn't know how to check oil levels have owned them.....

Our 156 is on 121k miles and going strong, but it's all a bit too complicated for my liking, which is why I can't bear to part with my 75.

Alfa really should have updated their own twin-spark lumps with a 16v head rather than put an Alfa head on the Fiat lump. But that would have been expensive - the all-alloy twin-cams were never the cheapest engine to produce.

alfa mad

219 posts

243 months

Wednesday 6th June 2007
quotequote all
I agree, the old alloy twin cam is just lovely. Like you, I can't bear to be parted from my 75TS either.

NJS25

446 posts

249 months

Wednesday 6th June 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for the advise, I am aware of the risks just couldn't justify £600 service on an £800 car?! and no decent specialist for 150 miles!!! (There is alot of misinformation around cambelts in general, but 11 years is taking the michael I'll admit)

Attitude was if it broke, it broke. Now decided she's staying, hence the complete overhaul.

As an additional note there are a large number of these cars still in service in europe, a testamnet to their underlying reliability, I also doubt if many of them have had their cambelts changed in line with the manufacturers recommendations.

Regards, Neil