F1 racing magazine

Author
Discussion

stew-S160

Original Poster:

8,006 posts

238 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
i subscribe to F1 racing. its good for a monthly thing, reading the articles which are obviously weeks behind i can deal with.

but when doing an interview with Mario Thiessen, Stuart Codling starts quoting the enemy(George Moonbat), i lose heart and think about chucking the mag in the bin.

month after month they seem to include more about environmental concerns which are supported by green pressure groups etc. wtf. i would have thought a magazine dedicated to the top level of motorsport would do a bit more bloody research on such junk rather than take it from the greens about whats what. afterall, they are in the business of journalism, some investigating might turn up a few things.


blah blah blah and so on.

think i need to cancel my subscription before it turns into F1 racing sponsored by the IPCC.

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

227 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
TBH I haven't bought it in years, last issue I read I got free with an Autosport subscription and it was awful.

Incidentally, what was being quoted? Personally I think motorsport should take the lead on this - doen properly not only will it have a great image but will benefit us all - imagine green cars that are fast and fun to drive.

stew-S160

Original Poster:

8,006 posts

238 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
dont have it in front of me, but basically he quotes Moonbat as though he is the best in his field and knows whats what. ill get the info in a bit.

rude-boy

22,227 posts

233 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
The Ex used to have a sub. to it.

As soon as I got my Autosport Sub we stopped it. Very little extra substance, mainly padding taking 1,000 words to say what Autosport said in 100.