R6 (and other) advice...
R6 (and other) advice...
Author
Discussion

monthefish

Original Poster:

20,467 posts

260 months

Saturday 23rd February 2008
quotequote all
Hi All, wavey

First post in 'Biker Banter' so be gentle....


I have decided that I am going to buy myself an R6.

(I have my heart set on an R6, so no suggestions of other bike to consider please - you'll just confuse me!!)

I have a (fairly) unlimited budget, but want to keep it sensible money so I'd like to spend around £5k (Bike £4k and kit £1k).

Something like this
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/384320.htm
or this
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/387184.htm


Any owners amongst you that can give me a few pointers on what to watch out for when buying an R6 second hand?

Also, what is the timeline of the bike in terms of facelifts, revisions etc?

(I did a search on the PH forums for R6 and couldn't find anything).

Cheers all.


Brite spark

2,101 posts

230 months

Saturday 23rd February 2008
quotequote all
http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/bikereviews/sear...

stickers changed a bit from year to year, but there were two main model changes, (the latest version having fuel injection-"fly by wire" )



Edited by Brite spark on Saturday 23 February 20:16

Hobo

6,605 posts

275 months

Saturday 23rd February 2008
quotequote all
Any reason you're going for the old model ?

hugepiece

724 posts

256 months

Sunday 24th February 2008
quotequote all
Well yam are doing zero percent finance right now so why not consdider new? I've just bought a brand new 08 bike for 6599! Well worth considering....

Momentofmadness

2,371 posts

270 months

Sunday 24th February 2008
quotequote all
No direct experience but prefacelift (before 2003) models can suffer from gearbox problems on hard-ridden examples - the 2003 model in your post would be the one to go for!

Might be worth having a nosey here http://www.r6messagenet.com/

smile

monthefish

Original Poster:

20,467 posts

260 months

Sunday 24th February 2008
quotequote all
Thanks for replies thumbup


Hobo said:
Any reason you're going for the old model ?
Naivety I guess!! (wasn't aware there was much difference between them) I really liked the looks of the old one, but if the post-faclift was a better bike, and around the same money, I'd certainly go for the later model.


hugepiece said:
Well yam are doing zero percent finance right now so why not consdider new? I've just bought a brand new 08 bike for 6599! Well worth considering....
Nice idea, but that's really pushing the budget a bit. As I've got the cash to buy outright, I'd rather not get into HP/finance situation.

Momentofmadness said:
No direct experience but prefacelift (before 2003) models can suffer from gearbox problems on hard-ridden examples - the 2003 model in your post would be the one to go for!

Might be worth having a nosey here http://www.r6messagenet.com/

smile
Think I'll make myself a cuppa and have a good trawl through that site.coffee

MaximumJed

745 posts

261 months

Monday 25th February 2008
quotequote all
Not much to say about them really, for that money you should get a very nice 03-05 bike without any problems, I've done 15,000 miles in the last 1½ years on mine and the only problems it's had have been the hazard switch needed cleaned, and recently the TPS has also needed cleaned out (bikes idle started getting rough with occasional stalling, 15 minute job to fix).

If you go through the R6 forums like R6messagenet, don't worry about the coils issue as AFAIK it's purely a US thing, we got the Mitsubishi coils as standard over here.

Craphouserat

1,541 posts

230 months

Monday 25th February 2008
quotequote all
No nothing bout the R6 - but it looks great !

Welcome to biker banter bud!!

I don't say much...but I watch you all....

Good luck with buying the bike mate thumbup

StuB

6,695 posts

268 months

Monday 25th February 2008
quotequote all
If budget's not an issue, get an R6R (from 06 on I think), mental bike which handles like a scalpel and screams like a banshee and looks totally stunning IMHO.

monthefish

Original Poster:

20,467 posts

260 months

Monday 25th February 2008
quotequote all
StuB said:
If budget's not an issue, get an R6R (from 06 on I think), mental bike which handles like a scalpel and screams like a banshee and looks totally stunning IMHO.
Just googled it - blooming gorgeous!!


This was my last bike..


...I think a standard R6 will be plenty quick enough!!

podman

9,078 posts

269 months

Monday 25th February 2008
quotequote all
Good first choice......and the older 600's had a far more useable (road)motors than the newer breed.

Only minus I would say against the R6 is it does have flighty , sensitive steering which would be off putting to a newbie until they got used to it.

















rsv gone!

11,288 posts

270 months

Monday 25th February 2008
quotequote all
The early models had more midrange and the most perfect fueling you've ever experienced (so long as nobody has changed the can). My only brand new bike! Compared with the latest 600s, it feels absolutely huge and comfy. It is a larger bike than my R1.

The later one was not a great leap onwards, although it was fuel injected.

2006- model is scalpel-like but has sod all midrange. You have to absolutely rag it to get any performance (although it come alive then!). Fine when you're in the mood but tedius any other time.

monthefish

Original Poster:

20,467 posts

260 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
podman said:
Good first choice......
The TZR was my last bike, not my first.

My first bike was this....








rsv gone! said:
It is a larger bike than my R1.
I thought R6's were smaller than R1's?



rsv gone! said:
The later one was not a great leap onwards, although it was fuel injected.
Was that from 2003 onwards?




rsv gone!

11,288 posts

270 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
monthefish said:
rsv gone! said:
It is a larger bike than my R1.
I thought R6's were smaller than R1's?
My 2001 R6 was bought off me by my sister so I could ride it back to back with my 2004 R1. The latest R1 is physically smaller than the older R6.

monthefish said:
rsv gone! said:
The later one was not a great leap onwards, although it was fuel injected.
Was that from 2003 onwards?
Yes, or thereabouts.

flamy

9 posts

234 months

Wednesday 27th February 2008
quotequote all
Hi I've got a 2000 R6 similar to that first one you posted.

Really are great bikes, the only thing I've come across is their stability at high speed. 120+ I find it quite twitchy and so if you plan on riding one fast to get a stearing damper.

I've not had any problems with my gears although am aware of others who have experienced this. 2003+ you shouldn't have a problem though.

Check for stuff like condensation in the headlights.

monthefish

Original Poster:

20,467 posts

260 months

Thursday 28th February 2008
quotequote all
flamy said:
Hi I've got a 2000 R6 similar to that first one you posted.

Really are great bikes, the only thing I've come across is their stability at high speed. 120+ I find it quite twitchy and so if you plan on riding one fast to get a stearing damper.

I've not had any problems with my gears although am aware of others who have experienced this. 2003+ you shouldn't have a problem though.

Check for stuff like condensation in the headlights.
Thanks, but I only intend to ride in the UK, so the max I'll be doing is 70. wink


(hehe)

hugepiece

724 posts

256 months

Thursday 6th March 2008
quotequote all
the new R6 is more than stable at well over double the NSL (Apparantly of coure.........)