Audi TT v Porsche Boxster (or other options)
Audi TT v Porsche Boxster (or other options)
Author
Discussion

thewave

Original Poster:

14,816 posts

230 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
More specifically Audi TT Cabrio Quattro 225 v Porsche Boxster 2.5/2.7

Does anyone have opinions on what's the better car?

Similar performance on paper

Both odd looking (IMO)

In summary.
The mother fancies a change, and asked me what I thought would be a good choice, she does like driving the Audi. The only similar car I could come up with was the Boxster. Would servicing be similar (main dealer) bearing in mind I would have thought the TT was a bit more complex?

Any other issues to consider in the switch from a TT to a Boxster?

Anyone who's driven both have an opinion?

Cheers

wavey

kambites

70,392 posts

242 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
The Boxster is a much better car to drive, the TT feels rather wooden in standard form. The TT is probably easier to drive in slippery conditions.

Other options:
S2000
MX5
Z4
MR2
SLK

And probably some others.

thewave

Original Poster:

14,816 posts

230 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
kambites said:
The Boxster is a much better car to drive, the TT feels rather wooden in standard form. The TT is probably easier to drive in slippery conditions.

Other options:
S2000
MX5
Z4
MR2
SLK

And probably some others.
SLK's not a bad shout, that's more her 'image' rolleyes lol!

kambites

70,392 posts

242 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
The (new) SLK is a damned fine drivers car too with (unusually for mercedes) a rather good manual gearbox in the 350.

Baffled Spoon

5,256 posts

215 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
Haven't driven a 986 boxster, but drove a 987 and that was a brilliant car to drive. The engine was also far more charismatic than the one in the tt. Have only driven a coupe 225 but the steering was lifeless and I should imagine the roadster might not be as stiff as the boxster. The engine felt pretty powerfull albeit soulless, much like the rest of the car. It was quite understeery when pushing on too.

Servicing wise, I should imagine that the tt will be cheaper as it will be easier to work on than the mid engined boxster. Parts are also likely to be cheaper for the audi and as is the labour.

LDNrevs

9,225 posts

224 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
Mazda RX8 - RWD, great fun and 2 back seats too

qooqiiu

753 posts

218 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
I have one and have driven the other.

The TT looks better and its power delivery is much more exciting than the 2.7 boxster. The interior is also much nicer! On a twisty road the boxster would eat a standard 225 alive, but how often do you really get to have a "proper drive"? Upkeep and maintenance would be similar, though the Porsche would be the slightly more expensive of the two.

The TT is timelessly desirable.

The boxster is a poor mans 911. (Fact)

Totally unbiased opinion. smile

briSk

14,291 posts

247 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
party "Boxster" party

sean19

672 posts

221 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
In the Boxster VS T.T.

The Boxster is without doubt the better 'Drivers' Car.

Two close friends of mine have an 02 Boxster and a 57 Plate TT. However nice the TT is, the Boxster feels a lot more 'special' and the noise from the 6 cylinder BOXER is very nice indeed! smile

The Older TT is a reshaped MK4 GTi and didn't exactly have glowing reviews.

dxb335d

2,905 posts

216 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
dont like the mk1 tt at all. Go for the porker!

agentsmith

412 posts

214 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
but the 2.5 Boxster is going to get pwned by anyone else in a hothatch. 2.7 is more like it, IIRC the 2.7 got faster too later on.

paoloh

8,617 posts

225 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
Z4 3.0 sport would eat both for breakfast

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

229 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
If it was you, I would say boxter, no contest, but for your mother the TT would probably be best, with the benifit of AWD grip.

What about a S2000? I love them.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

31,637 posts

256 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
sean19 said:
In the Boxster VS T.T.

The Boxster is without doubt the better 'Drivers' Car.
That'll be personal preference. The Boxster I drove felt very much like a "budget" car compared to the TT.

thewave

Original Poster:

14,816 posts

230 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
I must admit, the Audi feels well built, interior is nice, and what i've seen of the earlier boxsters, the interior looks a bit, cheap, but having not driven one, I don't feel I could really comment.

The TT is a capable car.

Don't think she likes the Z4, but I'll suggest it as with the S2000.

TOENHEEL

4,501 posts

248 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
qooqiiu said:
I have one and have driven the other.

The TT looks better and its power delivery is much more exciting than the 2.7 boxster. The interior is also much nicer! On a twisty road the boxster would eat a standard 225 alive, but how often do you really get to have a "proper drive"? Upkeep and maintenance would be similar, though the Porsche would be the slightly more expensive of the two.

The TT is timelessly desirable.

The boxster is a poor mans 911. (Fact)

Totally unbiased opinion. smile
I have a 228 bhp 2.7 986 and its miles better than a TT to drive. The TT feels like a heavy car and understeers like a pig. The Porsche is beautifully balanced and quicker by nearly 4 secsonds to a 100 after flying about with my mate in his 225bhp tt there is no comparison. As for the Boxster being a poor mans porsche bollo**s the TT is a poor mans Boxster!!! Also forget the 2.5 its just not quick enough and for what more it will cost you could have a 2.7. Engine wise althought turbo delivery is more exciting the old 1.8T cant even be compared to a Porsche flat six, sound gorgeous when revved..

Edited by TOENHEEL on Friday 4th April 16:26


Edited by TOENHEEL on Friday 4th April 16:29

TOENHEEL

4,501 posts

248 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
paoloh said:
Z4 3.0 sport would eat both for breakfast
No it wouldnt if your talking about the 231bhp Z4, Boxster has a far better chassis and performace is like for like against the 228bhp 2.7. nothing in it. If your talking about the 3.0SI Z4 then surely a 986 boxster s is a better comparison!!

Edited by TOENHEEL on Friday 4th April 16:36

Gad-Westy

16,128 posts

234 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
qooqiiu said:
The boxster is a poor mans 911. (Fact)
The 911 is poor man's Carrera GT. (Fact)

I'd say the TT is more Mum friendly but if she's anything like my mum, ultimately it'll be down to whichever one comes in the nicest colour.

RobM77

35,349 posts

255 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
scratchchin Four wheel drive understeering Audi vs mid engined Porsche? That's an easy one smile Bear in mind the engine locations as well, the Boxster has a much lower CofG.

Boxster every time yes

The two cars aren't even in the same genre are they? One's a driver's car and the other is a Golf hatchback in a pretty dress for motorways and city centres.

TOENHEEL

4,501 posts

248 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
scratchchin Four wheel drive understeering Audi vs mid engined Porsche? That's an easy one smile Bear in mind the engine locations as well, the Boxster has a much lower CofG.

Boxster every time yes

The two cars aren't even in the same genre are they? One's a driver's car and the other is a Golf hatchback in a pretty dress for motorways and city centres.
exactly.