Low vs. High Profile tyres

Low vs. High Profile tyres

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
Does anyone have any concrete information on this?

As I understand it, the benefit of high profile tyres, small rims is that they are lighter than low profiles / large rims, hence the unsprung weight is lower. What's so good about unsprung weight anyway?

I believe that another advantage is that the lighter the rims/tyres, the easier it is to accelerate them as there's less inertia to overcome.

However, low profile tyres deform less and allow for more control over the contact patch, better steering feel, more control over damping (high profile tyres can cause undamped responses to bumps)...

So what are the reasons for most kits (obvious exceptions excepted) being fitted with small rims and high profile tyres?

Ferg

15,242 posts

258 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
Can I just be first to own up that my Libra wears 205/40/17s because they look good!!?

liszt

4,329 posts

271 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
The tyre wall also forms part of the suspension. So a low profile tyre will tend to have a harsher ride than a higher profile tyre. Cost also comes into the equation as big alloys aint cheap

RichardD

3,560 posts

246 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
One advantage of low profile tyres is that there is less deformation when cornering. However on a lightweight kit car this isn't really a problem, and the extra give of a higher profile helps ride/handling.

Light cars don't require monster brake disks either. Big wheels / tyres and disks increase the unsprung weight.

I was once tempted with 15's on my Fury, but after investigation decided to stick.

>> Edited by RichardD on Tuesday 11th November 14:41

>> Edited by RichardD on Tuesday 11th November 14:41

Mark B

1,621 posts

266 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
LexSport said:
What's so good about unsprung weight anyway?


The lighter the unsprung mass, the better the resaponse from spring and damper inputs. If the unsprung mass is heavy, the springs and dampers need to work harder, therefore the grip level will drop as the tyre is not on the surface of the road.

Avocet

800 posts

256 months

Saturday 15th November 2003
quotequote all
Cars with a high Sprung -to- unsprung mass ratio ride better (e.g. Jags, Rollers, Mercs). This should also help handling because, as has been said, the dampers don't have to work as hard to keep the tyres in contact with the road. Imagine a very heavy wheel, tyre and brake hitting a bump as you drive along. Their natural tendency will be to carry on upwards for a while after hitting the bump (effectively they "take-off" like a skiier going over a ski jump). A light wheel/tyre/brake combination will need less restoring force to "push" it back down on to the road surface where it can do something useful.

As far as low profile tyres go, they are less tolerant of suspension geometries where the camber changes a lot as the wheel moves upwards. A full-profile tyre has lots of deflection in the carcass so it keeps pretty much the same footprint as the wheel changes its camber angle. The "downside" is that the "footprint" isn't as big for a given rolling diameter. If you get a suspension set-up that keeps the tyres flat under all circumstances (difficult) low-profiles have the potential for offering better grip. Also, the deep, squishy sidewall of the full profile tyre acts against you when turning into a corner because it provides a bit of a delay between what the wheel rim is doing and what the contact patch is doing. In other words, as you start to turn the steering wheel and the road wheel starts to turn, the sidewall just flexes and the footprint stays where it is for a fraction of a second. This can make the car feel a bit vague when you first turn into a bend but should also make it feel much less nervous and twitchy to dirve. No easy answer then -there's advantages and disadvantages to both. Also, I've had problems with light cars an wide tyres tending to "aquaplane" in the wet. Most kits (I think) are ridiculously over-tyred for their weight but wide tyres are fashionable!

tigerk

4,293 posts

257 months

Monday 17th November 2003
quotequote all
Nice reply Avocet. It's one of those subjects where everyone agrees that low unsprung weight is "good", but I for one have never thought about why.

JenkinsComp

918 posts

248 months

Friday 21st November 2003
quotequote all
I used to run 195/45 x 14s on my Sylva Fury.
Looked nice but gave the car a terrible ride.
So I changed to Caterham R500 13" rims which look miles better which lesss than a gnats chuff and use Avon ACB10s which have a much fatter sidewall. The extra sidewall gives a more comfortable ride and more notice when the car is about to go sideways than the low profiles which were much less forgiving, so it is easier to go quicker since you feel more confidence in what the car is going to do.
My old Sylva Leader used 185/70 x 13s and that had superb handling would drift so easily, again due to the right tyres for the job.

Julian West

12 posts

249 months

Tuesday 25th November 2003
quotequote all
Interesting stuff! Avocet, I agree that most kit cars look 'over tired', but does anyone have a guide as how to choose the best size tyres for a given application??

Is it simply a case of vehicle weight?

Avocet

800 posts

256 months

Wednesday 26th November 2003
quotequote all
Sort of... I think! the trouble is I'm getting out of my depth here now! I think the honest answer is that there aren't that many tyres with a light enough weight rating to work well on most kit cars. I think Avon make some special tyres for Caterhams but beyond that, I'm not sure. Also, the suspension geometry has a lot to do with it. Many cars don't utilise their full contact patch properly and the lighter the car and the lower the profile, the worse the problem is because they car just isn't heavy enough to "squash" the sidewall into taking up the difference between the camber angle and the road surface. I'm guessing a bit here but if you went out on the track and found that your tyres were "going off" because they got too hot, you could probably use bigger ones. Until that happens, you'd probably gain much more grip by using a softer compound than by using a bigger tyre. I'll ask some mates who are well up on this sort of thing and get back to the forum. Might take a few days though.

Julian West

12 posts

249 months

Thursday 27th November 2003
quotequote all
Thanks for the reply! any info greatly appreciated!

I'm rebuilding a GT40 rep & can't dcide on wheel/tyre size! The car isn't all that light, weighing in at about 1100 kg.

There is also a vanity issue !! The cars look 'right' with 15" rims, but the tyre choice is very limited for the rear, 16" rims give more choice (up to 255 wide) & look similar to 15", whereas 17" rims give plenty of tyre choice (up to 335 wide) but change the look of the car dramatically.

Also I beleive the geo isn't all that clever & a wide 17" tyre would be very difficult to keep in full contact with the ground, but perhaps the wider choice of tyre & compounds may compensate......

I'd appreciate any input to help me decide, I can't afford to buy too many sets of wheels & tyres!!!

gdr

586 posts

261 months

Thursday 27th November 2003
quotequote all
Agree that a GT40 will look better and more authentic with smaller wheels and higher profile tyres. what about a set of sticky mickeys? See website.

www.mickeythompsontires.com/street.html

They are somehow hooked up with Avon I think, sure you could get tyres in UK. Can get big width on small wheel. Probably not advisable to venture out in wet weather with these boots on, but will do the biz at the Pod on a sunny day.

(edited cos I spelt tyre tire - oh no I am becoming an American!)

>> Edited by gdr on Thursday 27th November 11:24

Julian West

12 posts

249 months

Thursday 27th November 2003
quotequote all
GDR,

Thanks for the link, got me excited for a minute, then I phoned the UK dealer & they only import motorcycle tyres into this country!

Shame, as they certainly look 'period' & would certainly make a RWYB day very entertaining!

gdr

586 posts

261 months

Thursday 27th November 2003
quotequote all
Julian,
If still excited, try a US part importer like Ultimate Spares of America www.ultimatespares.co.uk/ or maybe Real Steel (01895 440505).
There's nothing for sale in the US (apart from serious weaponry) that you can't get here by some means. Most Ultima builders buy their engines from US.


>> Edited by gdr on Thursday 27th November 16:05