I just drove an mx-5 and...

I just drove an mx-5 and...

Author
Discussion

Ron Burgundy

Original Poster:

3,296 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Well, sure shut my mouth, after years of constantly thinking its a car for fairys or hairdressers and wondering why everyone on here mention it as THE car to get. Now i know why, it was AWESOMELY good!

It was just on rails the whole time , it was only a short blast down a windy road but it was enough to answer all the questions ive always wondered! It was the mk2 1.8 version and loved to be revved!!!

But could i shake off the image of me feeling and , well looking like a bit of a cock driving one?

Answers people!

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

210 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Just dont put the roof down and you will be fine....

MTR

ShadownINja

76,491 posts

283 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
If it makes you happy, buy it. Sod what others think.

MattjK

246 posts

195 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
^ What he said, but if you're worried about the girly thing then look for a mint 1.8 mk1 instead. More or less the same car underneath, but less feminine-looking at the front. biggrin

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Your that bothered about what a few clueless fools will think about you?

Pyro

99 posts

182 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
if you fit in it i can only assume your 6ft or below, because im 6ft 2" and i dont fit in it... which is fking annoying!

defblade

7,454 posts

214 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
I'm 6'4" and I fit ok with the seat right back (in a Mk2). I have slightly short legs and long body for my height.

ali_kat

31,996 posts

222 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
TopBoy is 6'3" and has no problems getting in or out of mine, nor driving it biggrin

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

220 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Pyro said:
if you fit in it i can only assume your 6ft or below, because im 6ft 2" and i dont fit in it... which is fking annoying!
Did you test a Mk2.5 (i.e. Mk2 2001+)? The seats on this model are much taller and deeper than previous (and later) models so head-room & leg room does become a bit of an issue for taller drivers. I'm 6'1" though and can fit just fine in a Mk2.5 with just a little bit of leg space issue. Mk1 & Mk2 are fine though - loads of space.

magic torch

5,781 posts

223 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Try a mk1, it's easy to come off the rails...

ali_kat

31,996 posts

222 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
MX-5 Lazza said:
Pyro said:
if you fit in it i can only assume your 6ft or below, because im 6ft 2" and i dont fit in it... which is fking annoying!
Did you test a Mk2.5 (i.e. Mk2 2001+)? The seats on this model are much taller and deeper than previous (and later) models so head-room & leg room does become a bit of an issue for taller drivers. I'm 6'1" though and can fit just fine in a Mk2.5 with just a little bit of leg space issue. Mk1 & Mk2 are fine though - loads of space.
Mine's a 2.5 wink

Chris71

21,536 posts

243 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Your that bothered about what a few clueless fools will think about you?
Surely that makes it more fun?Although they can be used as a very rewarding driver's car the fact remains that a huge number of MX5s are driven gently by housewives in search of a 'pretty convertible'. That stereotype just makes it all the more amusing when someone who knows what they're doing makes mincemeat of a repmobile driver about to utter the phrase 'girl's car'.

falkster

4,258 posts

204 months

Sunday 5th April 2009
quotequote all
Pyro said:
if you fit in it i can only assume your 6ft or below, because im 6ft 2" and i dont fit in it... which is fking annoying!
Im 6ft3 and fit in ok....bugger to get in and out but once in Im fine. I dont give a monkeys what others think or say cos I think they are great cars.....was only just saying this morning its a better drive than the Boxster S.

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

220 months

Sunday 5th April 2009
quotequote all
falkster said:
I think they are great cars.....was only just saying this morning its a better drive than the Boxster S.
Are you listening Hornetrider wink

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Sunday 5th April 2009
quotequote all
MX-5 Lazza said:
falkster said:
I think they are great cars.....was only just saying this morning its a better drive than the Boxster S.
Are you listening Hornetrider wink
cry

hehe

The Boxster is so utterly capable though. Fabulous speed, computer game accurate handling, capable of lazy cruising at big speeds on the motorway, amazing stereo (yes, its important!), did I mention the speed, incredible grip, poise, did I mention that its fast?

Man, it's the right decision, but I'll miss the 5.

falkster

4,258 posts

204 months

Sunday 5th April 2009
quotequote all
Dont get me wrong, I went out in the Boxster today for a good drive and love it to bits....and you're correct about sat on the motorway BUT the MX5 is just so easy to drive, light steering, faultless handling and great brakes.....I do hate it on the M62 above 70mph though.

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

220 months

Monday 6th April 2009
quotequote all
Mine seems to be happiest at 95mph (Not that I ever drive at that speed on public roads of course...). The exhaust note is actually quieter than at 70!

NDNDNDND

2,035 posts

184 months

Monday 6th April 2009
quotequote all
Actually, I was a little worried about what people would think when I bought mine (it is white, after all) but when driving it, I couldn't give a toss what other people think. I'm having far too much of a laugh to care about that!

smiller

11,742 posts

205 months

Monday 6th April 2009
quotequote all
The steering.

The steering feel and accuracy is just magnificent.



chris7676

2,685 posts

221 months

Tuesday 7th April 2009
quotequote all
But, can they really reach 95mph ?