S4 or RS4?

Author
Discussion

NDT

Original Poster:

1,753 posts

264 months

Wednesday 24th June 2009
quotequote all
I'll soon be looking for a fast estate car.
Originally I had thoughts of getting an old-ish RS4, 2.7 biturbo model.
Then I spotted how much cheaper S4s of the same vintage are - maybe 7k vs 14k for a high mileage year 2000 car.
Is the RS4 really that much better?

Edited by NDT on Wednesday 24th June 18:32

pistnskint

782 posts

270 months

Wednesday 24th June 2009
quotequote all
Is the pope a Catholic - RS4

Al Wyn

866 posts

209 months

Wednesday 24th June 2009
quotequote all
Fly in the ointment... go drive the 2 B5s then go and drive an RS2 wink i know several guys who have had RS4s and loved them who have gone onto RS2s and prefered them... let us know how you get on.

posterboy

1,144 posts

194 months

Wednesday 24th June 2009
quotequote all
RS4smashsmash

GrahamC230K

384 posts

245 months

Thursday 25th June 2009
quotequote all
S4 (which I run) is such a bargain car now, but with the RS4 prices lower than ever, in your position I would be going for the RS.

Unless you are going for a low mileage, mint S4 example (in which case you could buy mine) they are toally different price ranges though, with the S4 being great value if your budget doesn't stretch the gap.

Or keep your eye out for a well upgraded S4. With a competent K04 upgrade the S4 can run more power than a even a remapped RS4 and prices fall nicely between the two. There are a surprising number of examples out there, not all of them good though.

Try both and go with which one you like for the outlay. The 2.7tt in either car is amazing. Not driven an RS4 but think there is little that will give the you kick mid revs like a B5 S4 and the relentless pull in any gear, particularly a remapped example.

Have a read on www.audisrs.com hwere there is a big B5 S/RS community.

NDT

Original Poster:

1,753 posts

264 months

Thursday 25th June 2009
quotequote all
Al Wyn said:
Fly in the ointment... go drive the 2 B5s then go and drive an RS2 wink i know several guys who have had RS4s and loved them who have gone onto RS2s and prefered them... let us know how you get on.
really want something more modern than the RS2, even though it's a legend.

NDT

Original Poster:

1,753 posts

264 months

Thursday 25th June 2009
quotequote all
pistnskint said:
Is the pope a Catholic - RS4
But why is it so much better than say a modded S4?

Dr G

15,197 posts

243 months

Thursday 25th June 2009
quotequote all
Totally subjective, but: Looks, rarity, feeling of driving something really special.

GrahamC230K

384 posts

245 months

Thursday 25th June 2009
quotequote all
Come to www.gtiinternational.co.uk this weekend and have a look at a few and speak to some owners.

great day out!

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

251 months

Thursday 25th June 2009
quotequote all
A good question and one that I had to chooose myself only very recently.

Budget is key I think.

I had around £15k to spend. An RS4 was logical, but I'd have been looking at a 10+ yr old car with 370bhp. I certainly couldn't have afforded the B7 shape (still high £20k's). So the S4 was a '54 plate, so only 4yrs old, and had a much more modern interior with only 30bhp less than the RS4.

The S4 continues to impress me, - that 4.2 v8 engine is just superb - and the level of kit it comes with is huge, as well as looking very modern still where (in my humble opinion) the old B5 RS4 does look a little dated. In a classy, retro way, but I was looking for more modern.

So - don't be put off by the S4 just because it has no " R " - it's only 30bhp difference and yet still a cracking cracking car.

Seez

656 posts

181 months

Thursday 25th June 2009
quotequote all
I have owned a B5 S4 and now have a B5 RS4, and both cars are very good, but both display the same sort of faults, clunky gearbox, variable power in hot weather, bogging down that sort of thing. Plus you can tune an S4 to be more powerful than an RS4, but you can also tune the RS4, so it is a bit of swings and roundabouts.

Obviously the RS4 is avant only whereas the S4 could be saloon or avant.

If you get the S4 you are missing out on the super cool body kit of the RS4 and the rarity factor, but have 100bhp less out of the box to play with, however in the real world, it isn't that far behind in terms of performance over the RS4.

I dont think running costs will be much different unless things start blowing up, but check the insurance also, I was quoted less for the RS4 than an S4!

Personally I like the RS4 over the S4, but only because of the wider body and as it is rarer is likely to hold its value better in the long term.

Now if you are thinking B7 S4 that is a different proposition, but just bear in mind it is very hard to tune the V8 whereas the 2.7 can be tuned to nutter power very easily!

Edited by Seez on Thursday 25th June 14:46

NDT

Original Poster:

1,753 posts

264 months

Thursday 25th June 2009
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
A good question and one that I had to chooose myself only very recently.

Budget is key I think.

I had around £15k to spend. An RS4 was logical, but I'd have been looking at a 10+ yr old car with 370bhp. I certainly couldn't have afforded the B7 shape (still high £20k's). So the S4 was a '54 plate, so only 4yrs old, and had a much more modern interior with only 30bhp less than the RS4.

The S4 continues to impress me, - that 4.2 v8 engine is just superb - and the level of kit it comes with is huge, as well as looking very modern still where (in my humble opinion) the old B5 RS4 does look a little dated. In a classy, retro way, but I was looking for more modern.

So - don't be put off by the S4 just because it has no " R " - it's only 30bhp difference and yet still a cracking cracking car.
Good points.
I'm very flexible on budget - I genuinely might spend anywhere between 5 and 18k.
When you think about it in your budget terms, the 15k B7 S4 definitely appeals more than an older B5 RS4....
But overall, turbo power appeals, so I'll probably be after the B5 S4 - much cheaper plus a lot more discrete (occasionally I leave my car overnight in a station car park with no security).

Seez

656 posts

181 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
You are of course in RS6 territory at that sort of money, that is very subtle indeed, I did consider one, but dropped it because of the auto box and I think if they go wrong they can be very expensive.

NDT

Original Poster:

1,753 posts

264 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
Seez said:
You are of course in RS6 territory at that sort of money, that is very subtle indeed, I did consider one, but dropped it because of the auto box and I think if they go wrong they can be very expensive.
Good point... probably a bit bigger than I was thinking.... but maybe....

mel

10,168 posts

276 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
NDT said:
TonyHetherington said:
A good question and one that I had to chooose myself only very recently.

Budget is key I think.

I had around £15k to spend. An RS4 was logical, but I'd have been looking at a 10+ yr old car with 370bhp. I certainly couldn't have afforded the B7 shape (still high £20k's). So the S4 was a '54 plate, so only 4yrs old, and had a much more modern interior with only 30bhp less than the RS4.

The S4 continues to impress me, - that 4.2 v8 engine is just superb - and the level of kit it comes with is huge, as well as looking very modern still where (in my humble opinion) the old B5 RS4 does look a little dated. In a classy, retro way, but I was looking for more modern.

So - don't be put off by the S4 just because it has no " R " - it's only 30bhp difference and yet still a cracking cracking car.
Good points.
I'm very flexible on budget - I genuinely might spend anywhere between 5 and 18k.
When you think about it in your budget terms, the 15k B7 S4 definitely appeals more than an older B5 RS4....
But overall, turbo power appeals, so I'll probably be after the B5 S4 - much cheaper plus a lot more discrete (occasionally I leave my car overnight in a station car park with no security).
Tony has hit the nail squarely on the head and I had the same dilema all be it a few years ago now, I thought B5 RS4 or B6 S4 I drove both and in all honesty the 4.2 V8 is leaps ahead of the older cars, the actual vehicle is so much nicer to be in and just feels like a leap forward in terms of build, style and technology. There's very little difference between a B6 & B7 though apart from the grill so I'd say save a few grand and go for B6 S4, but make sure you get the flappy paddles as they're just SO much better (alright I added that bit just for Tony wink )

T89 Callan

8,422 posts

194 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
mel said:
NDT said:
TonyHetherington said:
A good question and one that I had to chooose myself only very recently.

Budget is key I think.

I had around £15k to spend. An RS4 was logical, but I'd have been looking at a 10+ yr old car with 370bhp. I certainly couldn't have afforded the B7 shape (still high £20k's). So the S4 was a '54 plate, so only 4yrs old, and had a much more modern interior with only 30bhp less than the RS4.

The S4 continues to impress me, - that 4.2 v8 engine is just superb - and the level of kit it comes with is huge, as well as looking very modern still where (in my humble opinion) the old B5 RS4 does look a little dated. In a classy, retro way, but I was looking for more modern.

So - don't be put off by the S4 just because it has no " R " - it's only 30bhp difference and yet still a cracking cracking car.
Good points.
I'm very flexible on budget - I genuinely might spend anywhere between 5 and 18k.
When you think about it in your budget terms, the 15k B7 S4 definitely appeals more than an older B5 RS4....
But overall, turbo power appeals, so I'll probably be after the B5 S4 - much cheaper plus a lot more discrete (occasionally I leave my car overnight in a station car park with no security).
Tony has hit the nail squarely on the head and I had the same dilema all be it a few years ago now, I thought B5 RS4 or B6 S4 I drove both and in all honesty the 4.2 V8 is leaps ahead of the older cars, the actual vehicle is so much nicer to be in and just feels like a leap forward in terms of build, style and technology. There's very little difference between a B6 & B7 though apart from the grill so I'd say save a few grand and go for B6 S4, but make sure you get the flappy paddles as they're just SO much better (alright I added that bit just for Tony wink )
I had the same quandry and went for........ The B6 S4, picked up an '03 Plate with 2 years Audi Warranty and Roadside assist taxed tested and serviced from a dealer for less than a B5 RS4.

It's a fully specced Manual Estate (the best) with virtually every option and the V8 is just mind bogglingly good, I drove my old bosses B5 RS4 and it was no where near as good.

Also you may want to consider the running costs, I looked into it and basically the B6 S4 just runs a normal Audi service schedule (24K intervals) whereas the RS4 particularly the B5 require alot more attention.

Fort Jefferson

8,237 posts

223 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
The thing to remember about the B6S4 is. No cambelts, no turbos, no DRC and no FSi. They are the things that go wrong, and cost money.

T89 Callan

8,422 posts

194 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Fort Jefferson said:
The thing to remember about the B6S4 is. No cambelts, no turbos, no DRC and no FSi. They are the things that go wrong, and cost money.
Yeah, I was speaking to a technician at an Audi dealer about the engine in mine when we were testing the shocks and he said he didn't know anything about the engine as he has never had to take one out or take one apart.
Mine's done 80K now and I don't worry in the slightest, just keep it serviced.

Fort Jefferson

8,237 posts

223 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
T89 Callan said:
Fort Jefferson said:
The thing to remember about the B6S4 is. No cambelts, no turbos, no DRC and no FSi. They are the things that go wrong, and cost money.
Yeah, I was speaking to a technician at an Audi dealer about the engine in mine when we were testing the shocks and he said he didn't know anything about the engine as he has never had to take one out or take one apart.
Mine's done 80K now and I don't worry in the slightest, just keep it serviced.
I think the only ones taken out, were the ones that had the camchain tensioners done under warranty as a precausionary measure. Audi don't seam to think it's a problem now.

This is what they look like.....


blueg33

35,993 posts

225 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Fort Jefferson said:
T89 Callan said:
Fort Jefferson said:
The thing to remember about the B6S4 is. No cambelts, no turbos, no DRC and no FSi. They are the things that go wrong, and cost money.
Yeah, I was speaking to a technician at an Audi dealer about the engine in mine when we were testing the shocks and he said he didn't know anything about the engine as he has never had to take one out or take one apart.
Mine's done 80K now and I don't worry in the slightest, just keep it serviced.
I think the only ones taken out, were the ones that had the camchain tensioners done under warranty as a precausionary measure. Audi don't seam to think it's a problem now.

This is what they look like.....

Ahh...... the straightforward simplicity of the modern engine!