964 TURBO 3.3 v 964 TURBO 3.6

964 TURBO 3.3 v 964 TURBO 3.6

Author
Discussion

RICHES

Original Poster:

13 posts

228 months

Sunday 26th July 2009
quotequote all
Hi,

looking to purchase a 964 turbo or 964 turbo 2. I understand the main differences, not only engine, but the numbers produced. Also prices are double and more for the turbo 2. Is the 964 2 going to be the better investment for the future even though now it seems alot of money in comparison for a similar 964 1 version. It is very difficult to justify the additional money for the 964 2.
It would have very limited miles put on it over the years if i did purchase.

what would you do?

Ultra Violent

2,827 posts

269 months

Sunday 26th July 2009
quotequote all
There are 2 versions the 3.3 and the 3.6. Its the
rarity that inflates the value. There is a modist
Performance increase. As an investment asset the
3.6 is probably the best bet. However make sure
You get a good one as the 3.6 engine is a bit of
A mish mash trying to be EFI but still using the CIS
fuel head. If you're into modifying the 3.3 is
the better option.

Fastlane

1,139 posts

217 months

Sunday 26th July 2009
quotequote all
There is no such thing as a 964 turbo 1 or turbo 2. As UV says there are two versions of the 964 turbo - the 3.3 (1991-93) and the 3.6 (1993-94). Both were 911 turbos; the 3.3 was simply badged "turbo" but the 3.6 was badged "turbo 3.6". The nickname "turbo 2" came before the 3.6 was even released and was coined by some people to distinguish it from the original 911 turbo (the 930). It is also known as the 965 (another nickname) as it has quite a few parts listed starting with "965...".

As UV says, for investment buy the 3.6 as there were far fewer produced and they tend to be lower mileage and have only light modifications. For sheer value for money buy a good 3.3, add some Speedline look wheels (£1k) and new headers (£2k) and you'll have the looks and performance of a standard 3.6 for about half the price. There are a few cars out there for sale with exactly these mods - go and have a drive in a 3.3 and then drive a 3.6 and decide if it's worth the extra for the 3.6.

craigturbo2

450 posts

232 months

Sunday 26th July 2009
quotequote all
looking through the classifieds and both models are still fetching good prices.From original build numbers i wonder how many 3.3 and 3.6 are still left?

Ultra Violent

2,827 posts

269 months

Sunday 26th July 2009
quotequote all
Search this forum and rennlist there is plenty of material on
This subject.

kusee pee

1,021 posts

203 months

Sunday 26th July 2009
quotequote all
The 3.3 is 90% of the car for 70% of the money. If money is not an issue then the 3.6 is the better car but value-for-money the 3.3 has it beaten IMO and can easily be modded to produce 3.6 power.

Crimp a Length!

5,697 posts

223 months

Sunday 26th July 2009
quotequote all
kusee pee said:
The 3.3 is 90% of the car for 70% of the money. If money is not an issue then the 3.6 is the better car but value-for-money the 3.3 has it beaten IMO and can easily be modded to produce 3.6 power.
Totally agree, i owned a mint 3.3 and could hardly tell the difference in the real world, 3.6's are nice but not worth the on cost IMO

kayc

4,492 posts

221 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
I Bought a 3.3 Turbo a few months back after looking at quite a few,i think being totally specific about 3.3 or 3.6 is difficult as neither car is exactly in plentiful supply,especially in the sort of condition and history that i wanted..personally i think condition,mileage,history etc eventually will make either car reasonably valueable.A mint condition low mileage 3.3 will be worth more eventually than a doggy high mileage badly treated 3.6 imo..

Kiwi Carguy

1,202 posts

216 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
Fastlane said:
There is no such thing as a 964 turbo 1 or turbo 2. As UV says there are two versions of the 964 turbo - the 3.3 (1991-93) and the 3.6 (1993-94). Both were 911 turbos; the 3.3 was simply badged "turbo" but the 3.6 was badged "turbo 3.6". The nickname "turbo 2" came before the 3.6 was even released and was coined by some people to distinguish it from the original 911 turbo (the 930). It is also known as the 965 (another nickname) as it has quite a few parts listed starting with "965...".

As UV says, for investment buy the 3.6 as there were far fewer produced and they tend to be lower mileage and have only light modifications. For sheer value for money buy a good 3.3, add some Speedline look wheels (£1k) and new headers (£2k) and you'll have the looks and performance of a standard 3.6 for about half the price. There are a few cars out there for sale with exactly these mods - go and have a drive in a 3.3 and then drive a 3.6 and decide if it's worth the extra for the 3.6.
There is a Turbo 2 produced only for the US market also known as the S2. http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforums/964-turbo-fo...

Baby Blue

2,078 posts

240 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
How nice to read rational reasoned replies from turbo owners instead of the usual rants ................also clearly people who nhave used and enjoyed them instead of taking to rolling roads eternally for reasons best known to themselves ! Ex turbo owner sulking , missing it !

Kiwi Carguy

1,202 posts

216 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
Haven't had a 3.6 but have had a very nice 3.3 Ex Sultan of Brunei car. Had 1800kms on the clock when I got it. Was an immaculate car. I would definitely prefer a 3.6 but the 3.3 is 90% of the car at much less $$ and less concern around devaluing it.


Fastlane

1,139 posts

217 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
kayc said:
personally i think condition,mileage,history etc eventually will make either car reasonably valueable.A mint condition low mileage 3.3 will be worth more eventually than a doggy high mileage badly treated 3.6 imo..
Spot-on.

Kiwi Carguy said:
There is a Turbo 2 produced only for the US market also known as the S2. http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforums/964-turbo-fo...
Ah-ha, a fellow Rennlister. As the thread says, these Andial converted cars were never badged or called a turbo 2, just turbo or S2.

computamedic

312 posts

233 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
Just to prove the "S2" badging. It was just to distinguish the US Andial modified cars from the RoW Turbo S - the 1992 lightweight Turbo.



The "Turbo 2" name is a complete red herring - it never existed. In the same category as "965".

Regards

Dave

headlesshorseman

614 posts

206 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
answer to the original question is buy which ever one you can find-afford and enjoy the 3.6 is rarer but tend to be garage queens because the prices have gone mental in the last few years,3.3 are probebly just as good and a bit cheaper to buy either one is better that no 964 turbohehe

964Cup

1,424 posts

237 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
I had a 3.6T for a while in 2001/2. Even then it was a garage queen with I think 16k miles when I bought it (so around 2k per annum). A beautiful car with great driveability. When it worked. Which was rarely, because that little usage had led to all sorts of seals drying out and perishing. We never quite got the car to run reliably - it was particularly fond of idling at 4k RPM - so in the end I changed it for GT3. I've regretted it ever since, and would buy another one now *if* I could find one that had been used properly (and was certain that it was genuine - there's no shortage of cosmetic jobs out there) and hadn't been crashed (there's a few of those too). You're much more likely to find a well-looked-after 3.3 which runs nicely, and you won't torpedo its value if you make a few sensible mods. I've got a 997T now, and while it's much much faster than the 964, it has none of the character.

Ultra Violent

2,827 posts

269 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
That is probably due to the point I made earlier. Porsche
Tried to do EFI on the cheap and used a series of micro swithces
To measure throttle position and they would frequelty
Fail but dis so is such a random way that they were a bugger
To diagnose. Buy a 3.3 and start moddifying...

graeme36s

7,025 posts

217 months

Monday 27th July 2009
quotequote all
I owned a 964 3.6 turbo for eight years. Did not put much mileage on it but it always run like a dream. Apart from when it lunched its turbo but that is a different story. Low build numbers for 964 3.6 means that it will always command a premium. 964 3.3 turbo as a car 911 is not far behind. The most important thing is buy on condition. The 3.6 variant will be a chunk more money.

golfer99

387 posts

178 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
I bought a 964 Turbo 3.6 Its an amazing car. My Friend has a great 3.3 there isnt a lot in it . Just have to find the right one and thats the key . 3.3 or 3.6 both great to drive and
a fast appreciating assets

christer

2,804 posts

251 months

Tuesday 25th August 2009
quotequote all
RICHES said:
Hi,

looking to purchase a 964 turbo or 964 turbo 2. I understand the main differences, not only engine, but the numbers produced. Also prices are double and more for the turbo 2. Is the 964 2 going to be the better investment for the future even though now it seems alot of money in comparison for a similar 964 1 version. It is very difficult to justify the additional money for the 964 2.
It would have very limited miles put on it over the years if i did purchase.

what would you do?
I think you are a bit confused. If you are buying purely or mainly for investment purposes then it *has* to be the 3.6. If you are buying based on the driving experience and looks etc then the 3.3 is better value as others have said. Do not confuse these two scenarios - they are not compatible IMHO.

jonnywalker46

397 posts

185 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Just bought this