Mount St. Helens Photo

Author
Discussion

T4R

Original Poster:

461 posts

250 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2003
quotequote all
If anyone's interested I took this (485 KBytes) when over in the Pacific Northwest a couple of months ago. I'm no great photographer but I was quite pleased with the result. I was trying to convey the sense of awesome power unleashed by the explosion..

I took this (745 KBytes) from about 35 miles away down towards the bottom of the valley.

What do you think of the photos ? Any good ?

(I've also just installed Apache webserver on a machine at home this afternoon and I'm just fartin' around.)

Edited because as has quite correctly and kindly been pointed out, they're not small images and will take some time for dial-up users.

>>> Edited by T4R on Tuesday 23 December 18:20

simpo two

85,757 posts

266 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2003
quotequote all
Half a meg! I pity the dial-up brigade!
My only comment is that a polarising filter might help reduce the glare/washout effect near the top of the mountain, otherwise fine.

getcarter

29,424 posts

280 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2003
quotequote all
Fab pic T4 - IMHO, you did everything right... into the sun, landscape with stuff in foreground, which is in focus etc etc

Wish I'd been there!

Steve

T4R

Original Poster:

461 posts

250 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2003
quotequote all
Simpo, thanks for pointing out the size of the images. I've edited my original post accordingly.

I'd just bought a Minolta Dimage 7i and I'm still getting used to it. I'm generally quite pleased with it. I love the convenience of digital, and I get really miffed with shoddy film processing, although I do prefer the feel of my Nikon F80.

I've just been looking at some of the lunar shots in another thread. They're absolutely superb.

Bacardi

2,235 posts

277 months

Wednesday 24th December 2003
quotequote all
You lucky so & so. I was up there a couple of months ago and all I got was cloud covering the crater.



What made it worse was that I had already been on the road for 7 hours before deciding to chance the two hour detour, with a another 3 hour drive to get to my final destination. Bloody knackering! Watched the movie and spent about 15 mins outside before setting off again. Although the devastation that was caused is still amazing to see even after 23 years.



I like your shot, the foreground, with the broken tree sums it up the place nicely. Don't mind the flare, makes the volcano look more mysterious.

T4R

Original Poster:

461 posts

250 months

Wednesday 24th December 2003
quotequote all
It was taken in late October, and the forecast was indicating a front coming in from the north-west later in the day. Wind speed on the ridge was 50mph plus hence all the dust from the mountain. The flare was deliberate. (honest)

It's an amazing place to visit. If you're ever in the southern Washington/north Oregon area and the weather is reasonable you should make the effort.

tuffer

8,850 posts

268 months

Wednesday 24th December 2003
quotequote all
There's a piece missing !

hut49

3,544 posts

263 months

Wednesday 24th December 2003
quotequote all