Wrangler TJ - 2.4l vs 4.0l

Wrangler TJ - 2.4l vs 4.0l

Author
Discussion

zax

Original Poster:

1,009 posts

264 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
Been looking at Wrangler TJ's, would like to have one as a summer fun car. But fuel consumption on the 4.0l engine is a little excessive for my wallet. Doesn't seem to be much in it power wise - 143ps vs. 177ps and 10l/100km vs. 13l/100km combined fuel consumption.

Could anybody who has driven both tell me how the two engines compare? I've only driven the 4.0l model, and that was a very short drive. Thanks!

normalbloke

7,469 posts

220 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
I don't know to be honest,mine has the 5.9 V8 so both the 2.5 and the 4.0 seem a little gutless.......

zax

Original Poster:

1,009 posts

264 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
normalbloke said:
I don't know to be honest,mine has the 5.9 V8 so both the 2.5 and the 4.0 seem a little gutless.......
Surprisingly, that doesn't help me much laugh But it does sound appealing...

normalbloke

7,469 posts

220 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
Sorry, just having a giggle.
Try J33P.org or birtydastards for a wider opinion.
I hear that in the real world the 4 pot is not that much more economical than the 4.0. Sounds odd I know,but the 6 pot is a lazy old torquey engine.It is pretty bombproof too.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
zax said:
Been looking at Wrangler TJ's, would like to have one as a summer fun car. But fuel consumption on the 4.0l engine is a little excessive for my wallet. Doesn't seem to be much in it power wise - 143ps vs. 177ps and 10l/100km vs. 13l/100km combined fuel consumption.

Could anybody who has driven both tell me how the two engines compare? I've only driven the 4.0l model, and that was a very short drive. Thanks!
I've not been in the 2.4, but I think it's the same engine as you'd find in other Dodge/Chrysler products, such as the PT Cruiser and Neon.

I'm not certain, but isn't it a DOHC unit? Either way it's not the HP, but the torque and power curve that differ. The 2.4 makes good power, but you'll need to rev it to get it to work. And I suspect it'll feel a little gutless compared to a 4.0

Not sure on mpg's, I know the older 2.5 struggled to do much better than the 4.0 and while I would expect the 2.4 to be better than the 2.5, I suspect it's not by much. And if you drive it hard, then even though it's capable of better mpg, it might not show itself as much as you'd like.

If you plan to mod with big tyres and the like, then I suspect the 2.4 will struggle more, again due to the less torque in the lower rpms.

mantaray

250 posts

202 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Dont bother with a 4 pot TJ get the 4 litre every time