Giannasi, after publicity and celeb status like Brunstrom?

Giannasi, after publicity and celeb status like Brunstrom?

Author
Discussion

dandarez

Original Poster:

13,293 posts

284 months

Monday 9th August 2010
quotequote all
We'd better all remember this name!
He's after Brunstrom celeb status.rolleyes

Chief Con Mick GIANNASI, of Gwent Police, said casualties had almost halved over an eight year period due to the use of speed cameras.

And you just knew he would be from the Brunstrom (Mad Mullah of the traffic police Taliban) area, didn't you?

At least his hat is on straight!


Then you get on the same day Cambridgeshire Chief Constable, Julie Spence, saying speeding is "middle class anti-social behaviour".

Oh dear.
Please all resign promptly when the accident figures are next released (if they aren't fixed, like a penalty notice, of course.

Hedders

24,460 posts

248 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
How are we pronouncing his name? I read it as GiantNazi...


Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
Is that a Welsh name? or just another politicized stasi clone?

Black Sport 160

1,575 posts

220 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
Another plastic social worker that needs replacing with a proper copper.


turbobloke

104,014 posts

261 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
It's not his fault, blame the recruiters and promoters.

spaximus

4,233 posts

254 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
As head of the ACPO traffic he has to say what he does, he might even believe it. At this moment statisticians will be looking at ways to impove the accident figures they need. Deaths were quite low before cameras but if you added in "or seriously injured" the figure became a huge shocking figure. So now all they need to do is the same, so recatgorise any cut or bruise in a car and bingo "camera cuts have led to a significant rise in killed or seriously injured people, we need them back".

There are/were to many people making money out of these machines and they will not let them go without a fight. Round one has gone to common sense as councils cut the funding folowing the DOT doing the same. Round two is in progress but Brake and the police are now fighting back getting on TV talking about reductions in deaths, claiming that it was all down to cameras, using their considerable communication skills to manipulate the truth. This is going to be a 15 round fight followed by a rematch before this ends.

Puggit

48,476 posts

249 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
Safespeed were on BBC news yesterday refuting the Gwent statistics.

ExChrispy Porker

16,939 posts

229 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
I thought Brunstrom was North Wales?
Hardly the same area as Gwent.

off_again

12,340 posts

235 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
I know we all know, but has the media not noticed that the death / injury statistics for our roads have been pretty static, with a small reduction in the last 5 years. Nothing major and statistically the case isnt proven that is going down. In fact evidence shows that it could be more down to situational rather than causal. Still, Gwent Police claim a 41% reduction. Locally to me, Wiltshire has seen a 30% drop and then you have all of the other places.

So if there has been this dramatic drop - where is the increase? Which county / area has seen a massive increase? From what I can see, they are all claiming a drop - which means SOMEONE is lying. I wonder who?

Oh, and Swindon (who turned their cameras off a while now) have seen no increase or detremental change at or around camera sites. Lets see what happens.

dandarez

Original Poster:

13,293 posts

284 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
ExChrispy Porker said:
I thought Brunstrom was North Wales?
Hardly the same area as Gwent.
Area... I meant area as a land mass: ie Wales biggrin

ExChrispy Porker

16,939 posts

229 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
ExChrispy Porker said:
I thought Brunstrom was North Wales?
Hardly the same area as Gwent.
Area... I meant area as a land mass: ie Wales biggrin
I don't think you'll find much in common though laugh

rs1952

5,247 posts

260 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
ExChrispy Porker said:
I thought Brunstrom was North Wales?
Hardly the same area as Gwent.
Area... I meant area as a land mass: ie Wales biggrin
If you turn left at the English border you get there wink

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
ExChrispy Porker said:
I thought Brunstrom was North Wales?
Hardly the same area as Gwent.
Area... I meant area as a land mass: ie Wales biggrin
Are you saying that we all look the same to you? irked

hehe

rs1952

5,247 posts

260 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
off_again said:
I know we all know, but has the media not noticed that the death / injury statistics for our roads have been pretty static, with a small reduction in the last 5 years. Nothing major and statistically the case isnt proven that is going down. In fact evidence shows that it could be more down to situational rather than causal. Still, Gwent Police claim a 41% reduction. Locally to me, Wiltshire has seen a 30% drop and then you have all of the other places.

So if there has been this dramatic drop - where is the increase? Which county / area has seen a massive increase? From what I can see, they are all claiming a drop - which means SOMEONE is lying. I wonder who?

Oh, and Swindon (who turned their cameras off a while now) have seen no increase or detremental change at or around camera sites. Lets see what happens.
As I was writing the last post, BBC Radio 2 news were reporting an 88% increase in "trade" at an Oxfordshire camera that still had film in it after last week's switch off.

Now I wonder why they bothered to report that? rolleyes

Hedders

24,460 posts

248 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
rs1952 said:
off_again said:
As I was writing the last post, BBC Radio 2 news were reporting an 88% increase in "trade" at an Oxfordshire camera that still had film in it after last week's switch off.

Now I wonder why they bothered to report that? rolleyes
Did they mention the increase in accidents to go along with the nearly 100% increase in speeding, no? hehe


dandarez

Original Poster:

13,293 posts

284 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
I just had the Oxon radio on in car on the way back home earlier, and they're all spouting about 'vast increase in traffic speed' since the big switch off.

Not a murmur about accidents... how odd?

I got home quick too!biggrin

turbobloke

104,014 posts

261 months

Wednesday 11th August 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
I just had the Oxon radio on in car on the way back home earlier, and they're all spouting about 'vast increase in traffic speed' since the big switch off.

Not a murmur about accidents... how odd?

I got home quick too!biggrin
Yes how odd, still shorter journey times is good news. Speed saves (time) and time is life.

DSM2

3,624 posts

201 months

Wednesday 11th August 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
I just had the Oxon radio on in car on the way back home earlier, and they're all spouting about 'vast increase in traffic speed' since the big switch off.

Not a murmur about accidents... how odd?

I got home quick too!biggrin
That's right. In a 5 days survey they clocked 60-odd motorists breaking the speed limit on one road. An 88% increase on a year ago.

12 motorists per day, braking the limit.

Reassuring to know that this is the worst we have to worry about apparently, if people can devote such efforts for so little benefit.



Pothole

34,367 posts

283 months

Wednesday 11th August 2010
quotequote all
Hedders said:
rs1952 said:
off_again said:
As I was writing the last post, BBC Radio 2 news were reporting an 88% increase in "trade" at an Oxfordshire camera that still had film in it after last week's switch off.

Now I wonder why they bothered to report that? rolleyes
Did they mention the increase in accidents to go along with the nearly 100% increase in speeding, no? hehe
no they reported it as 'cars going too fast' which I think is disingenuous. Categorising breaking the speed limit as driving 'too fast' is st journalism, sadly typical BBC these days.