air to air refuelling...

Author
Discussion

DieselGriff

Original Poster:

5,160 posts

260 months

Friday 13th August 2010
quotequote all
Having just watched a programme about the C5 in which it refuels over the Atlantic I was reminded of the difference of approach by various forces and branches.

It seems that the US air-force are happy with and continue to use the boom method whilst the USMC and Navy use the drogue (? I made that up as I couldn't think of what to call it, but the basket and probe IYKWIM) method as do the RAF.

Just wondering what's the benefit and downside of each method? Also why would differing forces from the same nation choose different methods, it seems to me that economies could be made choosing one.

Also I have a lack of knowledge about air to air refuelling from other non-western nations so if anyone can shed light on this area I would be grateful.

D_T_W

2,502 posts

216 months

Friday 13th August 2010
quotequote all
As far as I was aware, they used the boom as it allowed a much higher rate of fuel transfer than "Probe and Drogue" (sp??), which when you're trying to fill the tanks on a C-5 is a fairly important factor!

eharding

13,754 posts

285 months

Friday 13th August 2010
quotequote all
As above - the boom allows far higher transfer rates than probe/drogue.

On the other hand, probe/drogue allows for multiple (smaller) types to be hooked up to the tanker at the same time, and the drogue system can be modularised as a detachable underwing store, allowing it to be deployed on a range of smaller types.

HillfootsBadger

74 posts

215 months

Friday 13th August 2010
quotequote all
Boom use also puts the emphasis on the tanker aircraft. Contingency in case of damaged aircraft and/or injured/exhausted receiver pilot.He just has to get close enough for the boomer to get him. Rather than the probe and drogue method with the skill emphasis on the receiving aircraft being able to fly accurately enough to get "his wet spaghetti up the cats ar5e" sonar

Eric Mc

122,106 posts

266 months

Friday 13th August 2010
quotequote all
Most air forces use the hose and drogue system although I think the Flying Boom system used by the USAF can be adapted to trail a hose as well.

boobles

15,241 posts

216 months

Friday 13th August 2010
quotequote all
That aircraft is something else. Magnificent peice of engineering.

Eric Mc

122,106 posts

266 months

Friday 13th August 2010
quotequote all
It definitely was for 1968. Not sure if it is that impressive now in that it has been surpassedn by a number of newer aircraft.

The flight deck lookls decidedly old fashioned too. It is large by airliner standards and still features a flight engineer - who went the way of the navigator and radio operator on airliners almost 20 years ago.

Flintstone

8,644 posts

248 months

Friday 13th August 2010
quotequote all
The boom is able to dispense Green Shield Stamps.

DieselGriff

Original Poster:

5,160 posts

260 months

Saturday 14th August 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies, I didn't realise there would be that much difference in transfer rates across the two methods but it makes sense.

Also moving the skill emphasis was apparent in the film, the boomer having to work quite hard.

Anyone know what method the Russians and Chinese use?

Eric Mc

122,106 posts

266 months

Saturday 14th August 2010
quotequote all
Hose and drogue.


boobles

15,241 posts

216 months

Saturday 14th August 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Hose and drogue.

Holy feck that is amazing pic.

Eric Mc

122,106 posts

266 months

Saturday 14th August 2010
quotequote all
Would have sounded pretty impressive too.

kiteless

11,729 posts

205 months

Saturday 14th August 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Would have sounded pretty impressive too.
I imagine it would. The pic shows how bloody big the Bear is.


Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Saturday 14th August 2010
quotequote all
Except they ain't hooked up. So it's really fraudulent to say that they can A/A at that low level over Moscow.

Also, the small pointy thing is definitely in the way if things were to go pear shaped. Still, nice framed picture of soviet antiques pleasing the president (or is he the PM this week).

Eric Mc

122,106 posts

266 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
Except they ain't hooked up. So it's really fraudulent to say that they can A/A at that low level over Moscow.

Also, the small pointy thing is definitely in the way if things were to go pear shaped. Still, nice framed picture of soviet antiques pleasing the president (or is he the PM this week).
I think the picture was taken back in May during the celebration of the end of the Great Patriotic War.

Flanders.

6,371 posts

209 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
I like the smoke coming out of the back of the Jet*.




  • I know what its called but I can't spell it frown.

The real Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Hose and drogue.
As an ex Tankie I'm gonna have to correct you there Eric, it's Probe and Drogue

S2K

71 posts

235 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
The real Apache said:
Eric Mc said:
Hose and drogue.
As an ex Tankie I'm gonna have to correct you there Eric, it's Probe and Drogue
The very apt name for 55sqn's old bar at Marham.

The real Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
S2K said:
The real Apache said:
Eric Mc said:
Hose and drogue.
As an ex Tankie I'm gonna have to correct you there Eric, it's Probe and Drogue
The very apt name for 55sqn's old bar at Marham.
You an ex 55er?