How much could we make out of RBS?

How much could we make out of RBS?

Author
Discussion

BoRED S2upid

Original Poster:

19,714 posts

241 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
I say we I mean the government.

The government paid an average of 50.2 pence for each of the 90.6 billion RBS shares it bought to save the bank from collapse. On Thursday, the shares had closed at 47.14p.


So 90.6 billion shares if they increased to say 50p, thats a fair profit. Ok they aren't anywhere near this yet but maybe in the future. My calculator doesn't have enough 00000's to do the sums.

OneDs

1,628 posts

177 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
I'd say keep them until dividends pay back the amount invested then any shares sold are pure profit.

Soovy

35,829 posts

272 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all


One thing is for sure, the taxpayer will make a mint here. Something which the chattering classes are too thick to realise.


"We bailed you out"


FFS.

BoRED S2upid

Original Poster:

19,714 posts

241 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Soovy said:
One thing is for sure, the taxpayer will make a mint here. Something which the chattering classes are too thick to realise.


"We bailed you out"


FFS.
The media doesn't help with the publics knowledge though, the Sun and the likes only report how many billions have been sunk in to bail them out. If they bothered to explain the profits were talking about it public opinion would change. But that doesn't sell papers, topless women do.

ANS2vrs370

516 posts

182 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Soovy said:
One thing is for sure, the taxpayer will make a mint here. Something which the chattering classes are too thick to realise.


"We bailed you out"


FFS.
Personally I think we should keep quiet about. If it finally sinks in with the chavs then they will want even more off the system for doing fkall and spending all day breeding.

hillcrest

19 posts

171 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
I say we I mean the government.

The government paid an average of 50.2 pence for each of the 90.6 billion RBS shares it bought to save the bank from collapse. On Thursday, the shares had closed at 47.14p.


So 90.6 billion shares if they increased to say 50p, thats a fair profit. Ok they aren't anywhere near this yet but maybe in the future. My calculator doesn't have enough 00000's to do the sums.
have you bought some then?

marky1

1,047 posts

197 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
I say we I mean the government.

The government paid an average of 50.2 pence for each of the 90.6 billion RBS shares it bought to save the bank from collapse. On Thursday, the shares had closed at 47.14p.


So 90.6 billion shares if they increased to say 50p, thats a fair profit. Ok they aren't anywhere near this yet but maybe in the future. My calculator doesn't have enough 00000's to do the sums.
If they paid 50.2p for them, if they increase to 50p that's not a fair profit, it's a loss.

Beardy10

23,276 posts

176 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
marky1 said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I say we I mean the government.

The government paid an average of 50.2 pence for each of the 90.6 billion RBS shares it bought to save the bank from collapse. On Thursday, the shares had closed at 47.14p.


So 90.6 billion shares if they increased to say 50p, thats a fair profit. Ok they aren't anywhere near this yet but maybe in the future. My calculator doesn't have enough 00000's to do the sums.
If they paid 50.2p for them, if they increase to 50p that's not a fair profit, it's a loss.
Is the right answer.

Beardy10

23,276 posts

176 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
What they SHOULD do is sell down enough of the equity so they get the EU off their back for competition regulations etc and sit on the rest and take a very nice dividend over the long term. That of course won't happen...it'll be sold off too early I suspect some of the shares will be available like the utility sell off's in the late 80's. It is amazing that the potential value of the shareholding doesn't get talked about more.

NorthernBoy

12,642 posts

258 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
They are back to making decent operating profits. There are still losses coming in from the bad assets (which, it's worth noting, were built up by only a relatively few people in the bank), but most business areas are doing very well again.

Fatman2

1,464 posts

170 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Beardy10 said:
marky1 said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I say we I mean the government.

The government paid an average of 50.2 pence for each of the 90.6 billion RBS shares it bought to save the bank from collapse. On Thursday, the shares had closed at 47.14p.


So 90.6 billion shares if they increased to say 50p, thats a fair profit. Ok they aren't anywhere near this yet but maybe in the future. My calculator doesn't have enough 00000's to do the sums.
If they paid 50.2p for them, if they increase to 50p that's not a fair profit, it's a loss.
Is the right answer.
LOL, well he didn't say who was going to profit from the 0.2p difference wink

Sorry BoRED S2upid but given your other post about the ineptitude of the HSBC I'm not sure you're having a particularly good day wink

TuxRacer

13,812 posts

192 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Beardy10 said:
marky1 said:
If they paid 50.2p for them, if they increase to 50p that's not a fair profit, it's a loss.
Is the right answer.
Thank fk for that. For a minute there I thought I'd missed something!

Beardy10

23,276 posts

176 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
NorthernBoy said:
There are still losses coming in from the bad assets (which, it's worth noting, were built up by only a relatively few people in the bank), but most business areas are doing very well again.
Trouble is one of those few people is the idiot that ran it!

marky1

1,047 posts

197 months

Saturday 6th November 2010
quotequote all
Fatman2 said:
Beardy10 said:
marky1 said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I say we I mean the government.

The government paid an average of 50.2 pence for each of the 90.6 billion RBS shares it bought to save the bank from collapse. On Thursday, the shares had closed at 47.14p.


So 90.6 billion shares if they increased to say 50p, thats a fair profit. Ok they aren't anywhere near this yet but maybe in the future. My calculator doesn't have enough 00000's to do the sums.
If they paid 50.2p for them, if they increase to 50p that's not a fair profit, it's a loss.
Is the right answer.
LOL, well he didn't say who was going to profit from the 0.2p difference wink

)
He referred to the 90.6bn shares the Government bought? Not sure what I am missing here because clearly the 0.2p is a loss for the Government and that's who he was talking about?

jon-

16,511 posts

217 months

Saturday 6th November 2010
quotequote all
I think he must mean if they increased /another/ 50p over what was paid, eg 100.2p/share.

Fatman2

1,464 posts

170 months

Saturday 6th November 2010
quotequote all
marky1 said:
Fatman2 said:
Beardy10 said:
marky1 said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I say we I mean the government.

The government paid an average of 50.2 pence for each of the 90.6 billion RBS shares it bought to save the bank from collapse. On Thursday, the shares had closed at 47.14p.


So 90.6 billion shares if they increased to say 50p, thats a fair profit. Ok they aren't anywhere near this yet but maybe in the future. My calculator doesn't have enough 00000's to do the sums.
If they paid 50.2p for them, if they increase to 50p that's not a fair profit, it's a loss.
Is the right answer.
LOL, well he didn't say who was going to profit from the 0.2p difference wink

)
He referred to the 90.6bn shares the Government bought? Not sure what I am missing here because clearly the 0.2p is a loss for the Government and that's who he was talking about?
I was just messing about so don't take my comment too seriously LOL.

If the shares were purchased directly from RBS then RBS would have profited from the 0.2p whilst the government lost 0.2p per share. But anyway I was just taking the wee wee so apologies for the misunderstanding smile

marky1

1,047 posts

197 months

Saturday 6th November 2010
quotequote all
Fatman2 said:
marky1 said:
Fatman2 said:
Beardy10 said:
marky1 said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I say we I mean the government.

The government paid an average of 50.2 pence for each of the 90.6 billion RBS shares it bought to save the bank from collapse. On Thursday, the shares had closed at 47.14p.


So 90.6 billion shares if they increased to say 50p, thats a fair profit. Ok they aren't anywhere near this yet but maybe in the future. My calculator doesn't have enough 00000's to do the sums.
If they paid 50.2p for them, if they increase to 50p that's not a fair profit, it's a loss.
Is the right answer.
LOL, well he didn't say who was going to profit from the 0.2p difference wink

)
He referred to the 90.6bn shares the Government bought? Not sure what I am missing here because clearly the 0.2p is a loss for the Government and that's who he was talking about?
I was just messing about so don't take my comment too seriously LOL.

If the shares were purchased directly from RBS then RBS would have profited from the 0.2p whilst the government lost 0.2p per share. But anyway I was just taking the wee wee so apologies for the misunderstanding smile
Ah sorry! Wasn't getting offended, just really couldn't figure out what you were saying! I get you now.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 7th November 2010
quotequote all
what is more important is what happens to the profit if it materialises imo

Let's say, for example, its £90bn (a quid a share). Sensibly that should be used immediately to pay off a (small) chunk of the national debt (£1 trillion or so)

The worst thing would be that it just dropped into the general taxation pot and was consumed on day to day costs of running the country

Beardy10

23,276 posts

176 months

Sunday 7th November 2010
quotequote all
JPJPJP said:
what is more important is what happens to the profit if it materialises imo

Let's say, for example, its £90bn (a quid a share).
Where do you get that number from ? Are you saying HM Govt's profit at a share price of £1 is £90bil ? Think you need to check your numbers if that is the case....IIRC before all this happened RBS's market cap was something like £60 or £70 bil and the sahre price was an awful lot higehr than £1.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 7th November 2010
quotequote all
Beardy10 said:
JPJPJP said:
what is more important is what happens to the profit if it materialises imo

Let's say, for example, its £90bn (a quid a share).
Where do you get that number from ? Are you saying HM Govt's profit at a share price of £1 is £90bil ? Think you need to check your numbers if that is the case....IIRC before all this happened RBS's market cap was something like £60 or £70 bil and the sahre price was an awful lot higehr than £1.
yes, I am a touch optimistic in that post....

There are 57,968m shares in issue and the government holding is 68.4% = 39,560m shares

So, £1 per share profit (i.e. selling for £1 per share more than it bought in at) only equals £39.5bn.