Wind Farm Planning Application Back In!

Wind Farm Planning Application Back In!

Author
Discussion

JCB123

Original Poster:

2,265 posts

197 months

Monday 15th November 2010
quotequote all
Damn!

Local wind farm application has just gone back in.

It was thrown out earlier in the year as some local parents with two autistic children complained it would've affected their childrens lives for the worse.

This family are now driving around in a nice new car, and the application is back in (read into that what you will).

Has anyone else had a wind farm battle? We, as a village, just don't know what to do now, it's as though these things are rail-roaded through.

Basic issue is location, simple sketch to follow.....

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

240 months

Monday 15th November 2010
quotequote all
Well, looks like momentum is growing for this type of energy source:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1141...

It's strange how different the UK is to other European countries. When I lived and workd in Brussels, a local colleague of mine told me that villages to the west of Brussels were begging for the new Eurostar link to come through/near their own village. In contrast to the UK when the link between St Pancras and the Channel Tunnel was endlessly being discussed because no one would accept in anywhere near them (even though a lot of them would be using it). The result was that it did get built but was around 15 years later than the Beligians or the French, so million of people using the service over that time suffered elongated and delayed journeys.

In Germany, there are loads of inland windfarms and they've simply become part of the lanscape and people just get on with it. What is it with the UK that anything new is never welcomed? It really makes the UK the slow man of Europe.

satans worm

2,387 posts

218 months

Monday 15th November 2010
quotequote all
Silver993tt said:
Well, looks like momentum is growing for this type of energy source:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1141...

It's strange how different the UK is to other European countries. When I lived and workd in Brussels, a local colleague of mine told me that villages to the west of Brussels were begging for the new Eurostar link to come through/near their own village. In contrast to the UK when the link between St Pancras and the Channel Tunnel was endlessly being discussed because no one would accept in anywhere near them (even though a lot of them would be using it). The result was that it did get built but was around 15 years later than the Beligians or the French, so million of people using the service over that time suffered elongated and delayed journeys.

In Germany, there are loads of inland windfarms and they've simply become part of the lanscape and people just get on with it. What is it with the UK that anything new is never welcomed? It really makes the UK the slow man of Europe.
I think the difference in the UK is location, the windfarms i have seen in Europe always seem to be in the middle of nowhere, unlike the uk that seems to dominate small villages that are just a mile or so away.
You also have to consider the noise factor, people move to quite villages to get away from the noise of the towns and cities, the downside of this is lack of convenience, but its a balance people are willing to do, then a windfarm/ rail line is suggested means now they have noise and inconvenience, and their home becomes some where they dont want to live anymore, and nor does anyone else so the value drops. All because someone who doesnt live in the village wants to make some money.
Keep the windfarms offshore and or near major roads or noisy environments that are already in place, not in heart of the countryside, IMO

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

171 months

Monday 15th November 2010
quotequote all
It's very easy to think people are NIMBY's. But then when YOU have to live with the noise, the massive over bearing visual intrusion, and the epileptic fit inducing sun flicker through the blades.........

............for something that isn't economically viable or rational!

JCB123

Original Poster:

2,265 posts

197 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
Quick cross-section through the local topography.....



Wind farms are OK where they are not a) directly visible from peoples houses/gardens and b) are not obscuring beautiful views........

We know we have no chance now of getting these things turned down, our last hope might be to contact the RAF who use the Trent and Lincolnshire Ridge in this location to practice something or other (believed to be bombing raids or low level flying)......?!

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

240 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
I don't think you have a case because you have a view.

hyperblue

2,803 posts

181 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
JCB123 said:
We know we have no chance now of getting these things turned down, our last hope might be to contact the RAF who use the Trent and Lincolnshire Ridge in this location to practice something or other (believed to be bombing raids or low level flying)......?!
NIMBY target practice? hehe

TimJMS

2,584 posts

252 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
...and North Lincolnshire is relatively speaking miles from anywhere and unpopulated, which is probably why youve been used as a bombing range for decades. If a wind farm application can't be pushed through to fruition there, then they can't succeed anywhere in England.

JCB123

Original Poster:

2,265 posts

197 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
hyperblue said:
JCB123 said:
We know we have no chance now of getting these things turned down, our last hope might be to contact the RAF who use the Trent and Lincolnshire Ridge in this location to practice something or other (believed to be bombing raids or low level flying)......?!
NIMBY target practice? hehe
I'd argue it shouldn't be in anyones backyard?!

JustinP1

13,330 posts

231 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
JCB123 said:
hyperblue said:
JCB123 said:
We know we have no chance now of getting these things turned down, our last hope might be to contact the RAF who use the Trent and Lincolnshire Ridge in this location to practice something or other (believed to be bombing raids or low level flying)......?!
NIMBY target practice? hehe
I'd argue it shouldn't be in anyones backyard?!
Maybe.

Perhaps if everyone in the village only ran their electricity for 2 hours a day and used candles for the other time you could get the press and start a new movement to show the UK doesn't need more power.

Or you could ask them to swop for a nuclear power site. I've heard that there were some nice villages at Sellafield who don't need to worry about their children being able to afford a house in the village they grew up in as the prices are very cheap there.

JCB123

Original Poster:

2,265 posts

197 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
There are about 10 turbines 2 miles in the opposite direction, but these are fine. They are in a dip, located away from anyones direct views, on the edge of the old steelworks land....

I'm not against them in the right location, I could still see them if they were to the South in the industrial part of North and Eastern Shorpe, but they're just sited in the wrong place?!

I take it noone has had any near them then?

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

240 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
satans worm said:
Silver993tt said:
Well, looks like momentum is growing for this type of energy source:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1141...

It's strange how different the UK is to other European countries. When I lived and workd in Brussels, a local colleague of mine told me that villages to the west of Brussels were begging for the new Eurostar link to come through/near their own village. In contrast to the UK when the link between St Pancras and the Channel Tunnel was endlessly being discussed because no one would accept in anywhere near them (even though a lot of them would be using it). The result was that it did get built but was around 15 years later than the Beligians or the French, so million of people using the service over that time suffered elongated and delayed journeys.

In Germany, there are loads of inland windfarms and they've simply become part of the lanscape and people just get on with it. What is it with the UK that anything new is never welcomed? It really makes the UK the slow man of Europe.
I think the difference in the UK is location, the windfarms i have seen in Europe always seem to be in the middle of nowhere, unlike the uk that seems to dominate small villages that are just a mile or so away.
You also have to consider the noise factor, people move to quite villages to get away from the noise of the towns and cities, the downside of this is lack of convenience, but its a balance people are willing to do, then a windfarm/ rail line is suggested means now they have noise and inconvenience, and their home becomes some where they dont want to live anymore, and nor does anyone else so the value drops. All because someone who doesnt live in the village wants to make some money.
Keep the windfarms offshore and or near major roads or noisy environments that are already in place, not in heart of the countryside, IMO
Germany is covered in windfarms and wind turbines, many not far from towns & villages:

http://www.thewindpower.net/country-datasheet-maps...

As I said, they just get on with it and it just becomes part of the landscape like a railway line or a road, it's part of the infrastructure. That's why they are a world leader in the manufacture of this technology and will no doubt be supplying the UK with many of theirs. A shame the UK disn't take the initiative years ago because it could have been the other way around.

Laurel Green

30,788 posts

233 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
I think you should go and find some rare newts at said construction site.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

171 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
Germany has half the population density of the UK and far greater opportunity to install these on land without significant impact. A distant view of a windfarm is one thing. Having it loom over your house where it will adversely affect your health and quality of life is quite another thing altogether.

Shay HTFC

3,588 posts

190 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
JCB123 said:
I take it noone has had any near them then?
We have these near us. I've grown up with them and really like them however.



Edited by Shay HTFC on Tuesday 16th November 14:01

JustinP1

13,330 posts

231 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
Shay HTFC said:
JCB123 said:
I take it noone has had any near them then?
We have these near us. I've grown up with them and really like them however.

OP:

It is not the windfarm, it is the 'affordable housing' you need to worry about...

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

240 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Germany has half the population density of the UK and far greater opportunity to install these on land without significant impact. A distant view of a windfarm is one thing. Having it loom over your house where it will adversely affect your health and quality of life is quite another thing altogether.
Really? I don't agree with that, they are about the same although more widely distributed so more chance of a wind turbine being closer to a property:


Country Density Square Kms Population
United Kingdom 244 244,820 60,587,000
Germany 233 357,021 82,217,800


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_and_population_o...

So that's a <5% difference in population density.



Edited by Silver993tt on Tuesday 16th November 12:01

staceyb

7,107 posts

225 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
Which windfarm is it? Flixborough, Keadby or Goole fields?

mk1fan

10,528 posts

226 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
and the epileptic fit inducing sun flicker through the blades.........
I wouldn't go wandering through a wood or forest then if such a low frequency induces a fit. I'd be careful turning the lights on too.

Why not disconnect the village from the national grid therefore off-setting the need for electricity?

JCB123

Original Poster:

2,265 posts

197 months

Tuesday 16th November 2010
quotequote all
staceyb said:
Which windfarm is it? Flixborough, Keadby or Goole fields?
Flixborough.....behind the wharfs on the fields which are at the bottom of the hill in front of Flixborough village and Burton Stather.....local?