Why is a claimant allowed to serve a claim himself?

Why is a claimant allowed to serve a claim himself?

Author
Discussion

Eclassy

Original Poster:

1,201 posts

123 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Last week I received a judgement in default against me for £4000. This was the first I was hearing about this claim (I know everyone says that). Maybe I missed the letter....damn!

I called up Northampton and it didnt take too long to work out what was going on.

The claimant probably in an act of revenge for a judgement I obtained against him filed a claim against me but provided a wrong address (wrong door number) to the courts. He knows the correct address so I suspect he did this thinking the letter will be binned by the house it went to and a judgement will be entered against me in default.

Luckily claim form was returned to the courts by the occipier at wrong address and I guess the court contacted the claimant. It is at this stage he provided my correct address but the court then let him serve the claim form himself and he provided the court with a certificate of service but he obviously didnt serve a claim to my correct address.

He wouldnt have dared serve to the correct address as I would have defended it. Having got some details of his claim from Northampton, it is so ludicrous it would have been thrown out in 5 minutes.

My question is why is a claimant allowed to serve a claim himself?

This is obviously open to abuse in a situation like this where it looks like the claimants sole aim is to obtain a judgement in default which I would never have known off thereby a CCJ is registered against me.

I have applied to have the judgement set aside and requested a hearing. This cost me £155. Is there anyway to recover this cost and is there any chance he will be punished if I can prove to the courts he has abused the system?


Eclassy

Original Poster:

1,201 posts

123 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
You will need to make an application to set aside. You will need to set out the circumstances.
I have. I am just wondering why the court allows this self certification of service by the claimant when it is so open to abuse.

By not serving me with the claim, he has avoided paying hearing fees and I have had to spend £155 which I wouldnt have had to as I would have succesdfully defended the ridiculous claim.

Can/Will the courts punish someone who is proven to have abused the system in this way?

Eclassy

Original Poster:

1,201 posts

123 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
JustinP1 said:
Look at CPR 13.2. That's your grounds to set aside.
Thanks for this. It looks like I will get my money back if it is set aside on amandatory ground or the case goes to trial and is successfully defended.

Not bad. Guranteed to be one of the two. Actually getting my money back is a completely different story.