Beavis v Parking Eye procedural rules/reserved Judgement

[TVR1]

This case;

http://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/parkingeye-vs-beav...

I can't see anywhere that a final Judgement has been entered yet but until that happens, what would the usual position be with similar cases? I happen to have a CC summons sitting in front of me for my wife for exactly the same thing and from Parking Eye.

I will be filling out the claim form admitting part of the cost (24 hours parking at Barnet when why wife was admitted to hospital for emergency treatment during the final days of pregnancy) but not the solicitors costs.

Should I mention the above case and request a stay until the final Judgement is delivered or will the case be Judged as things currently stand ie the case will fail under the current common law principles?

Many thanks in advance chaps!

[TVR1]

Cheers Agt;

Appeal dismissed then.

[TVR1]

PurpleMoonlight said:

There are millions of drivers that use car parks managed by PPC's on a daily basis without any issue because they abide by the parking restrictions. I have no sympathy for those that don't.

But what about my wife? She had no choice. There is no where else to Park at Barnet Hospital. Her primary concern was trying to save the life of our unborn daughter. Paying the £100 fee was low down on her priorities. She paid for a couple of hours but things ran over. Parking Eye was not interested.

[TVR1]

BUMP...


Being heard in The Supreme Court this week (starting today). Should be interesting....