employment solicitor / contracts specialist
Discussion
Maybe a long shot but... are there any employment solicitors or contracts specialists on here that could urgently review a couple of restrictive covenants within my employment contract.... See my other thread here for a bit of background.
I'm happy to pay, but it's become rather urgent now. At this stage, all I'd need is a "no, it's not enforceable" or a "yes it's enforceable but...." if the latter then obviously I'd need to look deeper into my options.
Thank you.
I'm happy to pay, but it's become rather urgent now. At this stage, all I'd need is a "no, it's not enforceable" or a "yes it's enforceable but...." if the latter then obviously I'd need to look deeper into my options.
Thank you.
Yes, I know BV well and you're right I suspect that he will be (well) out of my price range....
when I ask if it was enforceable (paying particular attention to clause C as that's the one I'd potentially fall foul of) I was thinking that someone could point out a glaring mistake like it not referring to a specific territory or something like that. I'm not after an iron clad, black/ white answer, more something like "they'd have a hard case enforcing it if it did go to litigation because...." - hopefully that makes sense??
when I ask if it was enforceable (paying particular attention to clause C as that's the one I'd potentially fall foul of) I was thinking that someone could point out a glaring mistake like it not referring to a specific territory or something like that. I'm not after an iron clad, black/ white answer, more something like "they'd have a hard case enforcing it if it did go to litigation because...." - hopefully that makes sense??
Jasandjules said:
I can give you further information along with case law if you wish but you would need to be a client to do so.
However, I can say as Justin has said, it is VERY difficult to give a straight answer in this kind of situation and if you read the case law you will see why.
ETA - I did already offer a preliminary view that it was rather wide ranging....
Sorry, I might have missed that comment as yours, BV's etc are the usual suspects I was looking for to answer. However, I can say as Justin has said, it is VERY difficult to give a straight answer in this kind of situation and if you read the case law you will see why.
ETA - I did already offer a preliminary view that it was rather wide ranging....
Thank you for spending the time to go over it, just to be clear I'm NOT looking for free advice. As I said, I'm happy to pay for someone to go over the contract and give me realistic advice and options
Sheepshanks said:
SickFish said:
At this stage, all I'd need is a "no, it's not enforceable" or a "yes it's enforceable but...." if the latter then obviously I'd need to look deeper into my options.
My next door neighbour moved companies at a fairly high level and his old company sought to enforce a 12mth break before working for a competitor in his contract.At first his new employer wanted to take on his old employer, but when legal fees quickly got to £40K and no-one would give a straight answer (nothing in law is black and white) his new company caved in and he took 12mths off.
I'm not high up within the company in the slightest....
TooLateForAName said:
I would have thought that C and D are too broad to be enforceable.
( But IANBV - I am not BreadVan72
)
To me they do not limit things to anything specific to your current employer. In effect they attempt to prevent you from working in the same industry (Clause C) and also to prevent you working in any industry providing services to a set of clients(clause D).
If a multinational were a client for your existing employer using some small niche product, clause D would prevent you working for any company which also supplies the same multinational - with no restriction to market sector.
If your current employer watered the plants at a branch of HSBC, clause D would prevent you being an employee of a supplier of office stationery to HSBC.
Of course the exact details of what you are considering will matter.
Another question would be - are you aware of anyone else who has previously moved from your company in a similar way - what happened to them?
Hmmm interesting, thanks for your thoughts.( But IANBV - I am not BreadVan72
)To me they do not limit things to anything specific to your current employer. In effect they attempt to prevent you from working in the same industry (Clause C) and also to prevent you working in any industry providing services to a set of clients(clause D).
If a multinational were a client for your existing employer using some small niche product, clause D would prevent you working for any company which also supplies the same multinational - with no restriction to market sector.
If your current employer watered the plants at a branch of HSBC, clause D would prevent you being an employee of a supplier of office stationery to HSBC.
Of course the exact details of what you are considering will matter.
Another question would be - are you aware of anyone else who has previously moved from your company in a similar way - what happened to them?
Edited by TooLateForAName on Monday 25th May 12:58
I'm not aware of people leaving to go to a competitor, but I know for a fact people have been poached by my current employer from other competitors
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff