More Evidence against LIDAR

[Davidonly]

LTI 20-20 dodgy scope looks like its days are numbered. I wonder how many folk lost licenses (jobs / homes) due to these things and their potential for serious error?

http://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/manufacturer-news/...

[Davidonly]

Breadvan72 said:

The use of the word "folk" is often if not invariably a FOTL wibblist alert flag. Won't someone think of the homeless puppies!

The single Mags case reported tells us little about which devices are accurate and which are not. The CPS might have lost the file, or not had someone available to run the case or whatevs (the CPS currently operate on an annual budget of a quid. The police get the other 50p, or is it the other way around?).

Anyway, you ent seen me, roight?

WTF?

I can't work out what this post means. 'Folk' means people (if that's aimed at me). Also known as citizens and taxpayers. LIDAR has many documented potential flaws, some of which are tackled (or so they say) in the software that runs the devices. Of course never in the history of ICT has there been a flaw in software corrections, never was it valid to question in-silicon modelling. Technology is always executed in a flawless manner. Oh and never has any system used to gather evidence been challenged and found wanting before... !

[Davidonly]

defblade said:

Is there not a good chance the case was dropped so that the "perfection" of the guns remains unquestioned in court? I'm guessing that proving them fallible even once would open the floodgates...?

THIS

Frequently ......