Police - excessive force on this week's news

Police - excessive force on this week's news

Author
Discussion

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
Where was the threat. The man was calm, he obviously didn't want to lay on the floor and why was it required?! (over an alleged fare dodge). Then the baton is drawn, ontop of this it was a really ineffective strike.

We're they both new? Why did it get to this? Jesus wept frown


https://youtu.be/K9_tGKfz4PQ

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
Agree there is indication of what preeceded but it looks like they went into to aggressively and then lost control. He wasn't shouting probably just being difficult. There was no need to ask him to lay down.

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
AH33 said:
Why should he get on the floor? Even if the guy was evading a fare, that doesn't warrant this sort of response. Police should be trained to not escalate minor things into major problems.
He was repeating 'I'll go with you'. Crackers isn't it. Theres a police saying 'go in with your slippers, you can always boot your boots on later'.

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
I'd love to see the preceding footage, was he taken to once side, the reasons why he might be cuffed (safety of both the officer and himself), the cuffs should be out swiftly whilst he is saying this.

However forget all that if you ask someone to stay still when your talking to them you should use your training (armbar, thumb-lock etc etc). Don't BTP get trained in this?!

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
There is unlawful arrest and at custody when the Officer is asked under what act/justification for arrest by the Sargeant it may get abit prickly/difficult. If it really is unjust and the officer is honest but can't point out clear fear or threat of violence then he/she will be in alot of trouble?

If that was me in the vid I'd like to think it wouldn't get to pushing and shoving.

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
Reference the Hobby bobby comment.

I'm one of those. I fit in just fine with regulars and I'm still young in service. Just like with regulars there are good, great and bad ones.

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Ok I'm Sat comfortably in my armchair, one of the officers is either new or is an inactive third party. At 30secs he had easy and ample opportunity to get a cuff on. If he didn't or was a rabbit in the headlights why didn't he shove his cuffs into his vest or holder and use both hands to assist?

The more time drags on the more time the person has to balloon, escape or draw attention. Get it done.

Anyway, we all make mistakes in the office. That is one major fk up.

Let's see what comes out. Hopefully they'll keep their accounts honest.

As for actual body harm, wtf.

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
CCTV

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
You can sometimes hear my other half shouting at my 5yr old son. It makes me cringe. This vid has the same effect.

What happened before? Indecision and no clear conviction?

Let's see what comes out in the official investigation and hope it's transparent.


Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Ok in defence of the officers.

'What is your name?'
X X
Do you have any ID on you to verify this?
'No'
Ok I need to ascertain who you say you are etc (reason given). Etc
Man gets jumpy/starts wandering
Please keep still sir otherwise I'll need to cuff you etc etc. Ask again and again. Man then starts getting agitated and shouting out that he isn't resisting, hea complying'. They ascert authority but one becomes a wallflower whilst the other is too small on his own, afterall the Chap looks easily 200lbs and isnt short. Because the officer is on his own effectively he's basically shouting on his own/isn't being backed up and is floudering/ineffective.

If this was a true version of events the wallflower can't be trusted to hold a coat in a fight.

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
NoNeed said:
Good.


Hope the copper rots in jail.



Thankfully most of our police are good, and I suspect most wont try and defend the indefensible as some on here are trying.
That's a bit harsh

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
NoNeed said:
Moominator said:
That's a bit harsh
Sowwyhippy
Have a Snickers laugh

Moominator

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Saturday 19th March 2016
quotequote all
La Liga you have arguing staying power eek

hora

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all
Any updates on this story yet?

hora

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
If he's not able to do the job properly then he shouldn't be doing the job.
Difficult one as you are told not to be a hero/go in gung ho. Saying that if he had been more pro active/acted with common sense it wouldn't have left his colleague hanging and flailing.

What would you have done? I know what I'd have done but then I've got a lot of life experience. This chap might be in his early 20's.

hora

Original Poster:

37,159 posts

212 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Bigends said:
If he wasn't happy that the action being taken by the other officer was reasonable, necessary and lawful then he was right not to join in

Edited by Bigends on Wednesday 4th May 11:24
Good point.