NIP after 45 days

Author
Discussion

cheeky

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

265 months

Thursday 28th April 2016
quotequote all
OH has received NIP for speeding 45 days after alleged offence, with date of notice 42 days after said date!

It is still the case that >17 days = invalid, isn't it?

cheeky

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

265 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
It does also ask her to name the driver.

It was her own car.

Nothing received prior to the 45 days at either of our addresses...

cheeky

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

265 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
But who is on the V5?
Her?
Lease Co?
Yes, she is on the V5.

As stated, it is her own car, not that of a lease company or anyone else.

cheeky

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

265 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Was she stopped and warned at the time? (in which case a notice of intended prosecution is not required)

Do any of the exceptions in s. 2 RTOA apply? (accident, fixed penalty notice, name and address of accused/registered keeper could not be ascertained..., accused contributed to failure)

Is this a reminder notice? (contact the ticket office and ascertain to whom the first notice was sent and when)

Btw, the notice rule is 14 days, not 17. N.b. there is no time limit for a request for driver information- so even if the notice is late then the driver nomination form must be returned.
The answer to each of the questions above is no.

I thought 14 days was for them to send it and 17 was the accepted limit for receipt, or is that out of date? Not that it matters, as 45 days is well beyond both.

cheeky

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

265 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
Red Devil said:
Answers needed to these questions.

Is she the RK? Is the address held on DVLA records up to date? Is it a second follow up Notice, the first either not having been delivered or not responded to?

The name the driver request is a S.172 notice. This is quite separate from any alleged speeding offence and should not be put on the back burner. Unless she can invoke the either the reasonable diligence or not practicable defences (unlikely) she risks an automatic 6 point penalty - http://www.pattersonlaw.co.uk/motoring-offences/s-...
Thanks for this. Presumably a reply by way of letter can satisfy the s172 notice if it names her as driver, and she does not have to fill in the Reply to Notice Form itself?