Cellulose vs Modern Two Pack on a Classic?

Cellulose vs Modern Two Pack on a Classic?

Author
Discussion

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Friday 21st November 2014
quotequote all
Obviously modern two pack paints are cleaner, more durable and general an improvement on cellulose and yet I often read in classic car magazines about older cars being restored using original cellulose paint.

What are people's views on this? As I gear up towards a re-paint for the Aston I am considering the alternatives, originality vs durability? I often hear people saying the finish on modern paints looks different to cellulose but is it, can you detect the difference? Can two pack be flatted down and polished to appear like cellulose?

Be interested in your thoughts... smile

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
Interesting chaps, so it's all in favour of cellulose so far...

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
Oh dear.
Cellulose / points /carbs again...
What do you mean?

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
From what people are saying maybe the 2K with a little flatting agent in the lacquer is the way to go?

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
RichB said:
V8 FOU said:
Oh dear.
Cellulose / points /carbs again...
What do you mean?
He's suggesting that there may be a bit of misty-eyed historical-revisionist-romanticism going on. The past was a much better place, so long as you ignore the rickets/deaths in childbirth/children up chimneys etc etc.
Ah right, I didn't get it. For the purpose of this thread I'm only interested in paint.

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
I'm interested in thoughts on this, I don't want an "us vs them" thread, that's not why I started it and it add nothing to the information I'm after.

As I said in my original post it will be a solid colour, not a metallic, and as it happens my preferred body shop uses two pack in preference to cellulose so that was the way I was leaning.

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
Oh, o/p, lighten up a bit,eh?
Sorry. I didn't understand you comment about points and carbs and didn't want the thread to descend into the usual Pistonheads arguing and bhing about snobs, anoraks and rivet counters. If I'd wanted that I'd have posted in the lounge laugh

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
Pie with sauce said:
Red is the weakest pigment Mark, so you see plenty of factory finishes displaying such fading. The best way if you want a deep, gleaming red is to (as you say) use 2K paint but use white undercoat.

But back to the reasons not to use cellulose, the weak red pigment and the resultant fading and chalkiness is a very important one, but in cellulose, this happens with other colours as well.

As I said, high maintenance.
That's interesting because the car is red and displays exactly the same marking as on that Capri when wet. The paint is 30 years old so I excuse it and polish it frequently to remove the marks but I don't particularly enjoy that aspect so it sounds like 2K is the way to go. Interested in anyone who has experience of adding a slight matting agent to get rid of the "looking through glass" aspect of the lacquer.

p.s. I've also just read elsewhere that 2K colour can be mixed with the lacquer and sprayed on as a solid colour rather than a flat base coat and a clear lacquer. Is this what I'm looking for? Excuse my non technical description... smile

Edited by RichB on Saturday 22 November 21:12

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
Thanks... the chap who mentioned it was referring to an Old English White MGA that he sprayed. Didn't use a lacquer, so same as you said.

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
Pie with sauce said:
You're confusing "clear-over-base" with 2K (two-pack).
p.s. I am indeed confused because I know bugger all about paint but thought it would be useful to find out a little before I talk to the body shops.

p.p.s. but I do know how to adjust points and tune a triple SU carb set-up wink

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
Pie with sauce said:
Are you a bit clearer about it all now then?
Not entirely laugh Clear over base is obviously what it says but I assume it's also two pack, yes? I guess I thought all two pack was applied clear over base. Didn't realise you could apply it without a clear lacquer.

RichB

Original Poster:

51,591 posts

284 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
tog said:
The front half of my Bristol was repainted in two-pack (by Mitchell Motors - http://www.mitchellmotors.co.uk - highly recommended) after a prang about seven years ago. The back half is twenty-ish year old cellulose. If I ever get around to repainting the back (or the whole thing) I shall certainly go for two-pack. It looks great, it is far easier to keep clean and polished, and it seems harder wearing (when I polish the back half the cloth goes dark blue instantly so it is clearly taking more paint off).
Well there's a coincidence, it's Andy Mitchell I am probably going to use smile

p.s. Is your car looked after by Spencer Lane-JOnes?