Observation

Author
Discussion

vonhosen

Original Poster:

40,281 posts

218 months

Monday 1st October 2007
quotequote all
On the link there is a video.
There are two teams consisting of three players each.
One team in white shirts & one in black.
Each have a basketball.
Count how many times in the clip, that the WHITE team pass the ball from one player's hands to another player's hands. It doesn't count if during the pass the ball touches the ground (only hand to hand).


http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/grafs/demos/15.html

vonhosen

Original Poster:

40,281 posts

218 months

Monday 1st October 2007
quotequote all
It an exercise in showing how the brain deals with information & it's limitations. The effect in this can be seen as a positive for some circumstances, but also highlights that there are also obviously dangers in it.

vonhosen

Original Poster:

40,281 posts

218 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
welsh blackbird said:
_Neal_ said:
You pay peanuts to the IAM and you get monkeys? wink
What does this mean? I passed my IAM test yesterday - have I wasted my time?
Did you count the passes ?

vonhosen

Original Poster:

40,281 posts

218 months

Saturday 20th October 2007
quotequote all
Yung Man

Watch it again but don't bother concentrating on the ball & counting.

Edited by vonhosen on Saturday 20th October 20:09

vonhosen

Original Poster:

40,281 posts

218 months

Sunday 21st October 2007
quotequote all
It doesn't matter, all that matters is watching it again afterwards, without concentrating on the ball this time.

Edited by vonhosen on Monday 22 October 06:58

vonhosen

Original Poster:

40,281 posts

218 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2007
quotequote all
waremark said:
So what sort of things do we miss in our driving observations?
You won't really know unless you have a moment, or unless someone else observing you judges from your actions that they think you've missed something, based on what they consider was an inappropriate response & they then discuss it with you.
We undoubtedly miss things, but whether it's important things or not will vary.
The better we are, the better we are at prioritising & know what not to waste too much focus on.

vonhosen

Original Poster:

40,281 posts

218 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2007
quotequote all
waremark said:
There is a general message that one should try to maintain a scan rather than focus on a particular known hazard.
In general you do scan, but when there is something very important you will give that a little more focus, it's inevitable & even necessary. The skill is not getting bogged down by focusing on what is not important to the detriment of something that is.

vonhosen

Original Poster:

40,281 posts

218 months

Wednesday 24th October 2007
quotequote all
waremark said:
Very interesting stuff (though I was not up to reading the full paper). Having identified the seach and observation characteristics of police drivers, the next question is how to train these characteristics without sending all drivers out on response and pursuit drives! I suspect that commentary helps. The commentary would never try to keep up with the scan, but the need to search out suitable material for the commentary encourages the scan. Do peope agree?

On the specific question of scan versus focus, VH is obviously right to say that some hazards require more attention. However, one coach pointed out to me that once you have identified a hazard you can often monitor it peripherally while continuing to scan. So for example as you pass a hazard you can monitor it with peripheral vision while continuing to scan well ahead. I sometimes do this consciously.

Edited by waremark on Wednesday 24th October 16:02
Depends what it is.
The child about to run out demands more than my peripheral vision. The action I'm going to take in relation to it, means I can temporarily suspend my scanning beyond that point, because I'm not going to be getting that far forward for a while.

There has been some more recent work looking at levels of driver training & it's resultant effect on crossmodal attention & processing. I've seen one paper (but it hasn't been published yet) & the other is still in the number crunching phase, the data having only just been collated.

Edited by vonhosen on Wednesday 24th October 18:03