Tag `bashing`

Author
Discussion

bigkeeko

Original Poster:

1,370 posts

144 months

Friday 7th October 2016
quotequote all
Seeing as it was touched on on another thread recently I thought I'd ask.

Me? I wouldn't go out of my way to buy one but wouldn't rule one out either especially if I could flip it. I admittedly like the Monaco but there still is a bit of the company that bugs me.
I remember back in the early 90s my local `jeweller` stocked these hideous plastic dialed, battery operated pieces of junk that the local social status climbers at the time just `had to get`. Cashing in on the Heuer name they were stinking then and they are stinking now but oddly enough old `Tags` are still fawned over by some people. Is this the reason they get a bad rap? Council estate bling maybe?
The Seiko parts in their `Swiss made` 1887 Cal didn't do them any favours either I'm guessing but what I'd like to know is why doesn't for example, Baume et Mercier or Longines get the same stick? Is is an LVMH thing with say, Hublot being equally criticised?

It's one of those brands that gets a bit of pasting by certain watch collectors and I wondered what other people's feelings on them were.


bigkeeko

Original Poster:

1,370 posts

144 months

Friday 7th October 2016
quotequote all
Mr Roper said:


It's all a bit stupid if you ask me.
I tend to agree but sadly in life (the big competition that it is) point scoring and hierarchy matters hence my thread. You gave your opinion and that's what I asked. smile

bigkeeko

Original Poster:

1,370 posts

144 months

Friday 7th October 2016
quotequote all
nikaiyo2 said:
bigkeeko said:
Seeing as it was touched on on another thread recently I thought I'd ask.

Me? I wouldn't go out of my way to buy one but wouldn't rule one out either especially if I could flip it. I admittedly like the Monaco but there still is a bit of the company that bugs me.
I remember back in the early 90s my local `jeweller` stocked these hideous plastic dialed, battery operated pieces of junk that the local social status climbers at the time just `had to get`. Cashing in on the Heuer name they were stinking then and they are stinking now but oddly enough old `Tags` are still fawned over by some people. Is this the reason they get a bad rap? Council estate bling maybe?
The Seiko parts in their `Swiss made` 1887 Cal didn't do them any favours either I'm guessing but what I'd like to know is why doesn't for example, Baume et Mercier or Longines get the same stick? Is is an LVMH thing with say, Hublot being equally criticised?

It's one of those brands that gets a bit of pasting by certain watch collectors and I wondered what other people's feelings on them were.
Not sure lol.

not sure how much if any is made by Sieko. (etc you get me lol)

I tried the latest Carera at Goodwood loved it apart form the dial lol.
Glad you had a good laugh typing that. smile

bigkeeko

Original Poster:

1,370 posts

144 months

Thursday 13th October 2016
quotequote all
Hol said:
I have a Tag F1.

Nowt wrong with it, it tells the time as well.
So does my cooker.

Joking aside, there are some Tags I like. The Monaco (mentioned above), first waterproof rectangular watch and stunning looking. Some less so but that could be said for any manufacturer.