The Apprentice - 2015
Discussion
The format got a bit boring for me a few series' ago, but the 'You're Fired' programme and Matt Edmondson's Apprentice stuff is usually pretty good, and really adds to it.
Hope he does another like this....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMDVc6gTp3Y
Hope he does another like this....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMDVc6gTp3Y
FourWheelDrift said:
BBC Apprentice said:
Joseph Valente - Joseph currently runs his own plumbing company.
AKA, a Plumber.Plumbing new depths?
BBC Apprentice said:
Dan Callaghan - Director of a fragrance retailer
Sells perfume from a suitcase on street corners, keep an eye for the rozzers Rodney.BBC Apprentice said:
Vana Koutsomitis - Social media entrepreneur
Uses Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.BBC Apprentice said:
Aisha Kasim - Inventor and hair extensions specialist
Hairdresser.(Next time I'm interviewing, I'm bringing you in)
TurboFan said:
technodup said:
ash73 said:
No decent totty, what are they playing at? Won't bother watching it 
It's the only reason I watch it and this year is slim pickings afaics.Jenny Garbis
Elle Stevenson
Form here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3264688/It...
Edited by monthefish on Monday 12th October 16:21
What was with the excessive criticism of the girl for taking the waitresses word for it? Can't imagine she would have got a different response direct from the chef/manager, and in any case, it would be highly disrespectful to say "thanks love, but I'm not prepared to take your word for it - get me someone else"
Countdown said:
FourWheelDrift said:
It was an anatomically correct skeleton required last year, I think Sugar's argument against was because flat cardboard bones are not anatomically correct. The requirement last night was for "an inflatable boat at least 1.5 metres in length", both teams bought an inflatable boat at least 1.5m long.
Shuggs has a tendency to change the rules as he goes along in order to get the outcome he wants, or in order to humiliate somebody he doesn't like.technodup said:
monthefish said:
What was with the excessive criticism of the girl for taking the waitresses word for it? Can't imagine she would have got a different response direct from the chef/manager, and in any case, it would be highly disrespectful to say "thanks love, but I'm not prepared to take your word for it - get me someone else"
First rule in business is to speak to someone who can make a decision on the proposal in question. A waitress is not that person in this case.
Are you applying for next years show?
jammy_basturd said:
Jonesy23 said:
If you're going to have a scripted show, have a scripted show. Don't mess people around and pretend otherwise and stitch things up in the background. Smacks of an amateur production team.
The BBC seems to do this with all their most popular shows. Top Gear was/is the same, became more and more scripted and contrived with every series.technodup said:
pauloroberto said:
How odd that the week when someone resigns (which is unprecedented?) is also the week when someone refuses to go on "you're fired" (which is also unprecedented?).
Curious
Katie Hopkins quit in one of the early series. And there have been a couple of no shows on You're Fired. So nothing unprecedented at all.Curious
kev1974 said:
To be honest I don't think Sugar had much choice! All the ideas were complete rubbish! Especially Captain Bulls
t Bingo and his marketing nonsense, when in the end he could not even market himself reliably! As for Charlene why the hell would you want to start something like that in London where it already exists 200 times over! £250k will be gone in rent and rates within months anyway!
He will go with the Vana dating app as he is blinded by tech and easily convinced she has the next Tinder, even though as others have pointed out the money will be gone in a few months on development, and even if she did hit on something good, Tinder/Match will just stick one of their junior developers on it and replicate it in a few days, in fact if there was anything in it they'd have done it already. From what I've seen of the dating youth of today they are shallow as hell, they just want to swipe swipe swipe and get instant contact, not be made to play games first!
What does the spiv boy need £250k for? To open a new branch of his plumbers he just needs to buy someone a van and some tools surely? Hardly massive investment?
Why do so many of them think franchising is the way to go?
Why do you think franchising is not the way to go?t Bingo and his marketing nonsense, when in the end he could not even market himself reliably! As for Charlene why the hell would you want to start something like that in London where it already exists 200 times over! £250k will be gone in rent and rates within months anyway!He will go with the Vana dating app as he is blinded by tech and easily convinced she has the next Tinder, even though as others have pointed out the money will be gone in a few months on development, and even if she did hit on something good, Tinder/Match will just stick one of their junior developers on it and replicate it in a few days, in fact if there was anything in it they'd have done it already. From what I've seen of the dating youth of today they are shallow as hell, they just want to swipe swipe swipe and get instant contact, not be made to play games first!
What does the spiv boy need £250k for? To open a new branch of his plumbers he just needs to buy someone a van and some tools surely? Hardly massive investment?
Why do so many of them think franchising is the way to go?
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff