North Korea - how serious should we take them?

North Korea - how serious should we take them?

Author
Discussion

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
More rhetoric coming out, but when does the time to stop laughing come?

When they launch a missile?
Another nuclear test?

When?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21935342



eta - title should read 'seriously'....

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
I saw that, but they allegedly caused a cyber attack on SK banking system last week.

So a Commodore 64 or not, they (possibly) have the ability to cause havoc.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:
They clearly have the numbers to mount such an assault.

Having any number of US hostages would cause an all mighty rumble.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Seems to be taking an unprecedented turn for the worse, according to some 'experts' -

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21972936

This article has an interesting insight - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21950069

I have bad feelings about this - I really think NK are going to start an unholy fk up!

Still, nowt any of us can do about it.

Edited by Zyp on Friday 29th March 08:11

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Brilliant.
Just as I'm going to be embarking on a trip to the US west coast in 7 weeks.....

http://www.businessinsider.com/north-korea-release...

Hope they can hold off for a while.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
davepoth said:
I love the US sending Stealth Bombers. That really is a class move.
Yeah, NK didn't see that coming.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
PH can settle this - you need to register, though smile

http://northkorea.activeboard.com/


Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Asterix said:
I wouldn't be surprised if China & the US were in open dialogue throwing around scenarios and likely outcomes to see how they could sort this out.

My thought's are it would be far more beneficial in the long term for someone, the US probably so to absolve China of blame, to remove the current NK regime. Then I think China would prefer to have a unified Korea for a number of reasons. Firstly, it puts the responsibility, cost and other factors on SK. They could provide benevolent support, which would make them look good and allow them to get a stronger hold on the whole peninsula from the inside and they will have a far more willing trading partner on their doorstep with plebty of tech to be snaffled.

I believe that once the NK population get to see the outside world with their own eyes, all that brain washing will count for little in a relatively short space of time.

What will Russia do? They will make lots of noise but if China are happy, they won't do much.
That's a great and sensible scenario, but does anyone that matters really think it could happen?

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Thursday 4th April 2013
quotequote all
Nikolai Petroff said:
In case of nuclear war only the cockroaches and the Swiss will survive.
And the Mini Cooper JCW.

Built of sterner stuff.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Friday 5th April 2013
quotequote all
Morningside said:
Why April the 10th yikes
I think that's when you need to put your mattress against your window.
It'll save you.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Tuesday 9th April 2013
quotequote all
MissyMac said:
Have they actually said that they will launch a test shot tomoorow?
Take cover

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/390452/North-K...

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Tuesday 9th April 2013
quotequote all
MissyMac said:
Okay, stop it now, you're scaring me!

After reading historical news reports and comparing them to the current situation, I think that NK are deadly serious and they seem to want to go into battle. Remember that they don't think like westerners. Death in war is an honorable way to die. The other thing was that after the last Korean war, they recieved lots of money to ut their country back together again. Currently, they have nothing, so what have they got to lose?

They have an extensive network of underground bunkers, so the government and high ranking party members will be okay and they don't give a damn about the peasants.

I think this young pup, Kim Jong Un actually wants to engage. He knows that they rest of the world won't bomb them into oblivion but he also knows that afterwards, there will be a huge rebuilding and aid programme waiting for NK.
Do you think I should cancel my holiday to the US west coast in May?
Might get some money back if i do it now - what would you do?

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Tuesday 9th April 2013
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
FFS get a grip.
hehe

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
Someone's calling Poland on 8994.1 LSB (calling SN3X)

Quite a lot going on.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
SebastienClement said:
What's a mongler?
Kim?

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
HoHoHo said:
Well the fat little mongler is full of st - he hasn't hit the 'go' button, he's all gob and no bks. I'd say hot air, but looking at the size of the little gob-ste more like burgers and chips!

And yes you fat little fker, you can add my name to your hate list if you like - it'll be right after the other 7 billion people on the list hehe
I imagine when his chubby little digit is pressing that button, he'll be cackling 'ho ho ho....'

And it's ALL your fault.

smile

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
fiatpower said:
What does that mean out of interest?
Haven't a clue - just sounded busy on that frequency.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
So just how 'minituarised' does a nuclear warhead need to be to fit on one of those massive missiles they've been parading?

Shirley, if you're going to develop a bomb you make your first one fit whatever size carrier you have?

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Rodman's also a bit of a fruitcake, so would fit right in.

Yeehaa.

Zyp

Original Poster:

14,698 posts

189 months

Sunday 14th April 2013
quotequote all
I've been quite impressed that we've managed 40+ pages of polite discussion.

Shame the Jews and Muslims have spoiled it......