Iranian nuclear deal in 6 months?

Iranian nuclear deal in 6 months?

Author
Discussion

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.pre...

Realistic for a deal to be struck or not? Or is the 6 months a delaying tactic?

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-242781...

& of course they also want Israel to disarm. Fair, but not going to happen.

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Friday 27th September 2013
quotequote all
Pappa Lurve said:
Apart from anything else I would love to visit the place :-)
Pretty women.

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Friday 27th September 2013
quotequote all
QuantumTokoloshi said:
...A slightly more balanced view is needed in this.
More respect for each other once both have nuclear weapons.

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
All that may be true.

But some on here seem set on proving the USA is as bad as Iran. Now the USA are no angels, but your phrase "more left afterwards as the regime killed may who opposed them" sums it up. How many Americans who oppose the party in power have been murdered by their own government?
As soon as you reset the calendar by circa a couple of centuries for Muslim countries vis-a vis the West for certain things, it all starts to make more sense. They will catch up, as will Africa etc.

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Thursday 7th November 2013
quotequote all
Puggit said:
Looks like the Saudis are nuclear capable now - albeit not nuclear armed...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-248238...
just started a thread on that smile

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...



Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Countdown said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
NelsonR32 said:
Israel would not have been happy whatever the outcome.......
Very true. RoW has come to realise that Israel will never be happy so might as well be ignored. The risk for Israel is that unless it can learn to get along with its neighbours (and non-Jewish residents) it will become increasingly isolated and may eventually be squeezed out of existence.
What's the bet that more Settlement-building will be announced in the next few days/weeks?
Can't please all the religious groups all the time.

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
davepoth said:
Jimbeaux said:
I am afraid you soon find that third parties magically got their hands on a nuke device. All of this " we are talking and not fighting" is blindness. Of course a deal is better than war but let's make a decent deal FFS. We held all of the chips, why give it away behind a weak deal?
And yet we never talk about Pakistan, who had Osama Bin Laden living there for ten years and "nobody noticed". In a choice between the Iranians and the Pakistanis, I think it's pretty clear who we could trust more to not let a nuclear weapon fall into the hands of terrorists.
I would choose to trust none of those; thank you.

The Saudis?

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
About as far as I could push that fat jet stuck on that short runway.
That's reasonable. smile

The Iranians will be better to deal with & their women are a lot prettier as far as I can see.

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Countdown said:
Arab women in general seem to be quite gorgeous. Until they get married AFAICS.
Examples please smile

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Wednesday 27th November 2013
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
..To the thread subject.....there is a danger of Israel making a deal with Saudi Arabia (who very much hates Iran)for basing military hardware for a strike on Iran. What limits such a strike by Israel is not ability but distance, Saudi territory would eliminate that distance. That said, I do not think this will happen, but it should be at least noted.
Enemy of my enemy etc. but I don't see it happening although makes sense to do so. If Saudi absorbs all the Palestinian..scratchchin

If the US falls out with Saudi Arabia over Iran, does Israel sit on the fence?

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Thursday 28th November 2013
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
So in short, the ME would be all harmonious if it weren't for the U.S. Israel, after being attacked by five nations, cannot keep some of the land taken in said war for a buffer? But of course, if you say so. thumbup
Can't clap with one hand. IMO, Israel (& the US while we are discussing them together smile) should have mounted a charm offensive many years ago, and still it is not too late.

Thanksgiving rather more.

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 2nd December 2013
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
They do not agree with Israel's right to exist, full stop. Those who know, know this.
So how/when will that change?

Mermaid

Original Poster:

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 2nd December 2013
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
Mermaid said:
Jimbeaux said:
They do not agree with Israel's right to exist, full stop. Those who know, know this.
So how/when will that change?
IMHO, it will change when another go is had at a two state agreement and Hamas along with anyone benefitting from the conflict being held at bay for a change.
The US should bribe everyone - a monthly retainer for 5 years. Cheaper than war wink