Hairy Cornflake (DLT) NOT GUILTY
Discussion
Says it all.
http://radiotoday.co.uk/2014/02/dlt-found-not-guil...
http://radiotoday.co.uk/2014/02/dlt-found-not-guil...
Edited by dandarez on Thursday 13th February 14:25
+1
Flogging a saving face dead horse.
So, a further hearing for DLT will take place at the end of next month.
A month later Rolf is back in court.
Keep it rolling along, keep costing the taxpayer. It's like a bloody pantomime.
And just to point out again, all the allegations against Saville regardless of whether he was the evil b
d, are still all 'alleged', every single allegation is 'alleged', all regardless of whether he committed the dreadful deeds or if he did not.
BUT notice how the word 'alleged' is dropped everywhere now, it's never, ever, mentioned.
So there you have it, he 'did' it!
No ifs, no buts, he's guilty as sin.
Innocent until 'proven' guilty, eh?
CPS march on.
Flogging a saving face dead horse.
So, a further hearing for DLT will take place at the end of next month.
A month later Rolf is back in court.
Keep it rolling along, keep costing the taxpayer. It's like a bloody pantomime.
And just to point out again, all the allegations against Saville regardless of whether he was the evil b
d, are still all 'alleged', every single allegation is 'alleged', all regardless of whether he committed the dreadful deeds or if he did not. BUT notice how the word 'alleged' is dropped everywhere now, it's never, ever, mentioned.
So there you have it, he 'did' it!
No ifs, no buts, he's guilty as sin.
Innocent until 'proven' guilty, eh?
CPS march on.
La Liga said:
turbobloke said:
Not quite, that equivalence would require dissolving the division between lawful and unlawful behaviour as though the distinction didn't matter.
I'm talking about motivations for behaviour. I'm not wrapping anything else around it as it doesn't alter the motivations. Scuffers said:
Show me another person who has been prosecuted in the same way for the same action?
Yes, this is the first re-trial in the history of English criminal law when a jury fails to reach a verdict for multiple sexual offences 
You mean sexual assault as it is now? Here's a recent sexual assault. Make a note of the sentence and he is entitled to his discount for pleading...
You make it sound like he produced a supermarket store card and got his discount!
Anyway, this scum imo is hardly comparable to DLT.
A complete stranger, he sidles up next to and 'sexually' assaults a girl he has never seen before and on public transport... and walks away (virtually) because he has used his 'discount' card, ie pleaded guilty.
And forgive me if I'm wrong, but I thought DLT has been convicted of 'indecent' assault (10-2 maj) not 'sexual' assault?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff