Cheating Website Ashley Madison Hacked
Discussion
Can't believe there is not a thread running on this already. Sorry if there is and I missed it:-
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-an...
Must be some very worried people out there.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-an...
Must be some very worried people out there.
Thankyou4calling said:
It's another Non story I'd say.
The website owners will have purposely placed the story to drive traffic to the site.
No body will be outed, no details leaked.
It ranks up there with the nonsense put out when the likes of Heidi Fleiss and Max Clifford were big news.
People saying there little black books would be revealing all of the innermost secrets of the celebrities they had been protecting and the gloves were now off. They don't have any secrets or info people don't want known.
Nothing to see here move on.
I can't see your logic at all. Surely this leak is very damaging to Ashley Madison and similar sites. Anybody who was thinking of signing up will surely think again before doing so now?The website owners will have purposely placed the story to drive traffic to the site.
No body will be outed, no details leaked.
It ranks up there with the nonsense put out when the likes of Heidi Fleiss and Max Clifford were big news.
People saying there little black books would be revealing all of the innermost secrets of the celebrities they had been protecting and the gloves were now off. They don't have any secrets or info people don't want known.
Nothing to see here move on.
DJRC said:
I rest my case. Yesterday it was news. Today it was a funny story over coffee at 9am and forgotten by 5pm.
As I said, their timespan to do anything once they made a public threat was measured in hours and less than 12.
Really? So you don't think the people who registered on the site will be worried. I certainly would be.As I said, their timespan to do anything once they made a public threat was measured in hours and less than 12.
The Spruce goose said:
reading wiki, it seems it is a sausage feast. 70% are blokes, and the lawsuit involving the women who was to, 'create over a thousand bogus member profiles within a three-week period '.
I imiagine the user, a married bloke spending hundreds on credits, talking to another bloke sitting in a office writing from a well trodden script, whilst the user gets a chub on.
sounds likes a rinsing plan to get as much money from blokes as it can.
Not sure Wiki is a reliable source. How would they know what % of Am's clients are male?I imiagine the user, a married bloke spending hundreds on credits, talking to another bloke sitting in a office writing from a well trodden script, whilst the user gets a chub on.
sounds likes a rinsing plan to get as much money from blokes as it can.
BBC radio interviewed a female member of AM a few weeks ago.
rxtx said:
bad company said:
So it's all s
te then?
I don't know either way, but it's quite common for dating sites to have multiple brands that cater to different markets, whilst using the exact same hardware and software, just with a different front end.te then?'
I replied saying it's all s
te then.I'm wasted here.
More data being found:-
'More Ashley Madison' data leaked onto dark net
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34004741
'More Ashley Madison' data leaked onto dark net
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34004741
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff