Trident - cost
Discussion
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/120...
So confirmed its decision has been delayed a further 5 years beyond this govt.
Secondly it states the trident cost has raised from £28billion to low £30billion. So how come anti trident speak out of £35billion of cost and they could spend that on weak fare etc instead. They have their sums out by a factor of >4x so why is this?
If. It is "only" £30billion for 50 years use that's very good value.
So confirmed its decision has been delayed a further 5 years beyond this govt.
Secondly it states the trident cost has raised from £28billion to low £30billion. So how come anti trident speak out of £35billion of cost and they could spend that on weak fare etc instead. They have their sums out by a factor of >4x so why is this?
If. It is "only" £30billion for 50 years use that's very good value.
Troubleatmill said:
Anti trident have been banging on about 100 billion....
So the first link below is the latest real figure used today by the govt to debate the defence policy. The second is a scaremongering article which anti trident hang onto - it costs £167billion.
Smoke and mirrors shame on those anti trident replacement you spread the lies like those promise pies the SNP spout
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/nov/23/tri...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cost...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff