Chest size matters

Author
Discussion

glenrobbo

Original Poster:

35,266 posts

150 months

Tuesday 30th June 2015
quotequote all
That's got the collective PH attention wink

But it's not what you're thinking. nono

I want to order a new polo shirt with a custom embroidered logo, but it seems there is a massive variation in the sizing ranges between different manufacturers.

For instance, my chest measures a healthy PH average of 44", a bit less than my brother Sylvest with his row of 40 medals.

44" equates to EXL according to the company producing the garment I require.
However, my official TVRCC T-shirt is a Size L, measures 44" chest and fits perfectly.
I also have a sweatshirt by Urban Spirit which measures a baggy 50", but that is just a Size M.

The net result is confusion about which size to order. Especially when I have to allow for possible garment shrinkage and/ or Body Mass Index increase in the future.
Why oh why can't the rag trade agree on a standardised sizing policy?

And don't get me started on willy warmer sizes, it's a minefield out there!

What are your experiences?

ETA. I do have further upper body garments* I was only using the above items as examples for illustration purposes.

  • Nope, nothing by Victoria's Secret. smile
Edited by glenrobbo on Tuesday 30th June 11:35

glenrobbo

Original Poster:

35,266 posts

150 months

Tuesday 30th June 2015
quotequote all
PH5121 said:
Are you getting the emblem on a generic fruit of the loom / russel athletic type of garment as often utilised by workwear branding companies?
The polo shirts are possibly bought-in by this company, but neither of those labels apply. I can't remember the label name on the example I saw the other day.
Huge choice of colours and excellent quality though.

glenrobbo

Original Poster:

35,266 posts

150 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
Bump!

Still no explanation as to why the world of men's garments can't adopt a standard sizing policy. frown