Does anyone here wear fur.

Does anyone here wear fur.

Author
Discussion

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
I have recently had a Sheepskin fur coat made. I love it! It feels luxurious and I can wear it on nights out and to rugby matches with just trousers, jeans and a long sleeved shirt or t- shirt.

What are your thoughts on fur! I would not wear, any other fur. I feel that sheep are being killed for meat anyway therefore it is ok to wear a ship skin coat. In the same way I wear leather shoes and have leather handbags but would not have alligator or snake skin.




N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
I don't but only because I don't particulalry like it and it doesn't fit my manly look!

TBH I don't really think of the ethical side though as fur as a clothing product isn't on my wave length.

My daughter wears it though, she has a rabbit fur coat that she got mega cheap as the lady who sold it to her decided to become a vegan and wanted it gone asap, it was £850 new and she paid less than £50, she also has various hats made of various animal furs.

She works for a fashion brand; high end bags mainly, she has loads of leather items; bags, wallets, purses etc all made from crocodile skin, snake skin, calf leather, emu etc. The prices are astronomical but she gets them either free or at a vastly reduced rate. Apparently it is all ethically produced and farmed but I don't know if that is true or not

She loves labels and all that sort of stuff and doesn't care what people think, sometimes it is a bit difficult when she is around her sister in law as she is a vegan and also used to work for PETA.
Very lucky girl. My daughter has a Moncler coat which has a little bit of Canada goose I think and she has just been measured for a sheep skin gilet. Rabbit fur for £50 is amazing my kid would love that! I would to be fair but I have to have that sort of thing made for a perfect fit.


Edited by N-TY4C on Sunday 19th February 16:00

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
InductionRoar said:
I have a pair of rabbit fur lined peccary gloves - I don't think a man can really get away with anything else. I justify rabbit fur in the same way as the OP justifies sheepskin.

I do think a woman wearing furs can be very attractive in the right scenario but faux fur is hideous and should be avoided at all costs.
I agree. Faux fur is hideous!

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Well these guys made mine to measure and to my specification. Pop in and treat yourself or the Mrs:

http://www.citysheepskin.co.uk

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
whoami said:
From that website
Pop in. The website is no good. Go in and have one made.

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
condor said:
I bought a full length fur coat over 35 years ago and wear it occasionally in the winter months.
Show us your fur then. It sounds grand. I bet it is better quality than anything available to buy now.

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
condor said:
[pic] screenshot tool[/pic]
Wow! Is that you in the pic? I would not wear mine while plucking what looks like pheasant. Did you shoot that yourself?

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
My fur seems insignificant now compared to Condor's. Can anyone else show us their fur?

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Don said:
BigMon said:
As with others on this thread. If the fur is a by-product of an animal being sent to slaughter, or being killed by hunting or something similar then I don't have a problem with that.

But I would never wear fur from anything that had been bred on a fur farm and I find it astonishing that anyone can honestly not see any problem with that. Breeding animals just to slaughter them for vanity purposes is abhorrent in the extreme.
Personally I have no problem with animals being bred for their fur. So long as the rest of their carcass isn't wasted and their welfare is to a high quality. It's more important how good a LIFE they were having: which is the same argument as always trying to buy free-range, slow-grown chickens, rather than caged/barn birds.

Killing animals because you want to use them is fine. Mistreating them so they have a miserable life is most definitely NOT.
Does it show in the quality of fur how the animal was treated then?

N-TY4C

Original Poster:

169 posts

98 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2017
quotequote all
Goaty Bill 2 said:
DonkeyApple said:
BigMon said:
Yes, they are all very good points. I suppose I was thinking more about animals being treated inhumanely.
I think most people are of the view that if it's not an endangered animal and if they are treated well and the rest of the body used then there is no problem with fur.

The core issue with fur is that it is attached to animals with big baby eyes so the mentally weak and disturbed confuse them with children. They don't give a fk about chicken feathers because chickens are fk ugly. biggrin
Indeed, and while I thought it might be next after the ban on fox hunting, fishing seems to have been left quite alone.
Cold slimy things don't seem to elicit much love from the more militant of 'that sort' either.
What about cows? Cows have long lashes and pretty eyes but no one cares about them!