Subaru Legacy 2.5

Subaru Legacy 2.5

Author
Discussion

StoatInACoat

Original Poster:

1,354 posts

185 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
Our ancient Peugeot is starting to get a bit dilapidated and t'other half would like a new car which seems fair enough biggrin

She makes ceramics and we do a fair bit of camping in fields with everything we own so the Pug tends to get filled to the roof + roof box and then drags its arse along the ground. It's not doing it any good so an estate would be brilliant. With this in mind we are thinking one of these:

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2013...

Not keen on another clattery diesel although I accept that they aren't as "agricultural" now as a 306 we're bored of the sound effects, smoke, stinky pumps and soaring costs of filling the bloody thing up. She has had diesels for long enough and would like a change. The car will be expected to do a bit of commuting, a bit of city driving and a fair bit of long distance work. She would like an auto I think but it isn't a major concern. 4WD/AWD would be a benefit with muddy campsites etc.

Any owners experiences of the Legacy would be brilliant - positive or negative. 2.5 looks a good all rounder to me for power/economy/road tax/insurance. Would prefer something 2.0 or above with around 150bhp + and does at least 30mpg combined. Have looked at Freelanders (rubbish), CRV (nice but not as "car like" as the Subaru, and Mondeo V6's (doesn't like). Budget £3k ideally, less if possible but £4k at a push. Whatever it is needs to be strong or relatively easy to home repair/service as it will get a beating!

StoatInACoat

Original Poster:

1,354 posts

185 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
Ah. Not terribly encouraging frown Any preventative maintenance to stop this happening or just the luck of the draw? Fair few high mileage ones around so assumed the engine would be solid.

StoatInACoat

Original Poster:

1,354 posts

185 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
Looks like quite a drop in economy between the 2.5 and the 3.0 - 34>28mpg if autotrader is to be believed! Might be a bit rich for us frown

StoatInACoat

Original Poster:

1,354 posts

185 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
Thank you, just what I was after. I was hoping for the bullet proof thing to come through and I must admit I was surprised that a big, heavy auto with a 2.5 would do 34mpg - 28-30 sounds more likely then.

Take your point on the consumables. Might price up some bits at some stage to see what running repairs are likely to cost.

We were looking at Ovlovs and Saabs as the 4x4 thing isn't essential but keep running into the same MPG issues frown

StoatInACoat

Original Poster:

1,354 posts

185 months

Tuesday 16th July 2013
quotequote all
Some good info in here. Thanks Watchman, I expect we will have more questions eventually! I will forward this on and see if I can work out a way of justifying the fuel costs! I like the sound of the 3.0 being a chain so that'll offset the belt cost on a 2.5...