Rosetta Probe

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Should be entering orbit around this strange object today. It certainly does look rather weird -


Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Wait until the comet starts outgassing as it gets closer to the sun. That should be spectacular.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
I'm sure there are still a few million tons of material locked up in it.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Friday 8th August 2014
quotequote all
Nil.

Next question.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Sunday 10th August 2014
quotequote all
The animation posted above seems to show pictorially precisely that happening.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Sunday 10th August 2014
quotequote all
Laplace said:
Eric Mc said:
The animation posted above seems to show pictorially precisely that happening.
It does indeed and very nicely too, but it doesn't tell you why it takes this approach.
Didn't say it did.

Tying up the verbal explanation given above with the earlier movie demonstrates it all clearly.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
Landing site selected today. It looks like they are going for the "safer" of the various options i.e. a relatively smooth bit of terrain.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
I wonder how long that's laid there?

It looks like it rolled slightly as there seems to be a faint track leading up to the boulder.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
There is ALMOST no gravity - but there is some.

Also, if the rock was blasted out by an impact aeons ago - it may still have slid along the surface before coming to rest.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
On the bottom right hand quadrant there appears to be what looks like a pillar sticking out from the surface.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
What is the ratio for its dimensions...... is it black.....
Hee hee.

That would be good.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
It looks quite powdery to me.

Before we started soft landing probes on the moon, there was genuine fear that the surface might be so loose and powdery that a probe or a Lunar Module might sink into a sea of dust. That proved unfounded. But I think there may be surfaces like that on bodies such as comets.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
There will be a number of forces acting on the matter that makes up the object keeping it together. Gravity is the obvious one. There will also be molecular bonds and friction between the particles which will allow the particles to "stick" together.

However, the density may be quite low as the material may not be too compacted together - which could lead to a "merengue" type surface.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
Sounds like HAL talking to SAL.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Friday 17th October 2014
quotequote all
Watched the Sky at Night last night and they said they are covering the landing live on BBC starting at 9.00 pm on November 16.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Friday 17th October 2014
quotequote all
Good preparation for my OU Moons course.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Saturday 18th October 2014
quotequote all
The explanations they were giving were what was assumed 20 plus years ago.

With the discovery of lots of new planets around other stars - especially Hot Jupiters (Jupiter style planets close to their parent star), the assumption that gas giants can only form beyond a certain distance from the star does seem to be not 0100% correct.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 12th November 2014
quotequote all
Mr Trophy said:
outnumbered said:
It doesn't come back - it analyses the samples on site.
Now that's impressive.
The Surveyor lunar landers analysed lunar soil on site in 1966.

We have had the ability to carry out soil sampling and analysis on other bodies in the solar system for almost 50 years and the technology available has improved immensely in that of time. Obviously, each target has its own separate challenges.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 12th November 2014
quotequote all
Not sure. Obviously, there is a time delay between the probe transmitting data and the information arriving at earth. It's 300 million miles away.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 12th November 2014
quotequote all
I'm watching the "action" on the ESA link but they aren't really doing a very good job in letting us know what is actually happening.

They could do with a few lessons from NASA.

Phew - they are now receiving telemetry from the lander.