Chernobyl Gazeebo now in place

[Gandahar]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-38150529

Only took 30 years. Wonder if that will need some other container in 30 years? Russian doll scenario rather than China Syndrome.

As a quick off topic, when Chinese nuclear plants undergo meltdown what syndrome is that?

How much has this cost in total? How much will Fukushima cost? Those are the ones that have caused effects beyond the plant boundries.

Even dear old Dounreay is costing a fortune to decommission, lots of job opportunities

http://www.dounreay.com/about-us/careers-at-dounre...

Career at Dounray, 40 hours per week for the next 8 million years and may include weekend shifts.



I'd rather have a Welsh pit pony called Taffy getting some coal out of the ground in 2016 than our brave new world of 1950's where nuclear power is so cheap they would give it out free....

It's a pile of crap.

Pun intended.

[Gandahar]

Max_Torque said:

Back in the real world, the cost, pollution and deaths as a result of nuclear power are insignificant compared to those caused by fossil fuel extraction and use.

"Blah blah none relevant off topic banter snipped"


But yeah, nuclear, real bad init..........

I was only talking about the costs, perhaps you can re-read my post again and then put some counter argument with costs in comparison rather than what grinds your beef?

The issue here is that nuclear costs are hard to work out end to end because nobody has ever fully decommissioned a nuclear plant fully to see what they are. And that's without any accidents to add more costs.

Edited by Gandahar on Sunday 4th December 16:40

[Gandahar]

RumbleOfThunder said:

Might've been the most ignorant OP I've read all year.

Only matched by a lazy reply that adds nothing to the argument. Well done.