RE: Spotted: Citroen ZX 16v

RE: Spotted: Citroen ZX 16v

Monday 4th February 2013

Spotted: Citroen ZX 16v

An oft-forgotten but under-rated French hot hatch is found hiding in the classifieds



Before we start this Spotted, I have to admit to a bit of bias. You see, my first car was a Citroen ZX (and, indeed, my second, after I pranged the first one in fairly spectacular style). Both were lowly 1.4-litre models, late of year and laden with all the kerb appeal of a walking stick. But they were big enough to throw all my mates in the back of, had plush seats and electric windows, and with an AX GTI-derived (OK, it was 25hp down on the GTI, but still) engine, they felt like the fastest thing in the world to a teenager who, until then, had only had command of a 1.0-litre Nissan Micra.

2.0 engine majored on mid-range torque
2.0 engine majored on mid-range torque
Of course, as one does, I loved my first car(s), and became fixated on owning the ‘halo model’ of the ZX range one day: the 16V. The what, now? Well, quite. History has not been kind to the ZX 16V, and today it’s only a select few people who remember it even existed. Considerably overshadowed by its cousin, the Peugeot 306 GTI-6, and let down by its comparatively frumpy looks, few people laid down hard cash for one. Consequently, today the ZX 16V languishes forlornly in the doldrums of hot hatch history, seen by many as nothing more than a curiosity.

Which is a shame when you consider that it was actually an extremely competent hot hatch. It featured the same 152hp 2.0-litre engine and five-speed gearbox that later made it into the Peugeot 306 S16 (in this pre-facelift form at least – later 16Vs got the GTI-6’s 167hp unit). The ZX also featured a ‘passive rear-wheel-steer system’ – essentially, deformable front mounts on the rear torsion beam that allowed it to sway when lateral forces were applied.

Interior was livened up by red piping
Interior was livened up by red piping
Allied to a powerplant that leaned more toward solid mid-range torque than outright rev-happiness, this made the ZX a real hoot to drive. Despite the body roll, grip levels were very high, and 205-esque lift-off oversteer was there for the taking when the limit was breached. Turn-in was super sharp and the steering was direct, too, giving a lightness and alacrity that rivals such as VW’s Mk3 Golf GTi 16V found it hard to match. And inside, there was none of the flakiness you’d normally associate with a French interior of the period; instead, solidly screwed-together black plastics and figure-hugging seats with a flutter of red piping made it a pleasant – if slightly dour – place to be.

So the ZX 16V doesn’t necessarily deserve to be one of the forgotten men of the 90s hot hatch race. But its position as such does offer the advantage of low prices. This one, for example, is probably the best, if not one of, in the country. With a meagre 38,000 miles on the clock, it’s barely run-in, and there’s an astonishing amount of history to back that up. It’s finished in black, a colour which suits the ZX’s chunky lines, and cosmetically it looks near-mint. And yet the price is £2,375. Strong money, you might think, when average examples of these can be had for Shed money, but we reckon a bit of bartering could see you drive it home for two grand. When you consider this is the best around, that seems fairly reasonable to us.

16v today has a whiff of retro cool about it
16v today has a whiff of retro cool about it
In fact, as the realisation of a long-standing ambition, this particular ZX is looking exceptionally tempting to me. There’d be no better way to revisit those youthful dreams of early 90s Gallic hot hatchery. If it’s still there in a couple of weeks, be warned: you might just see this forgotten man taking a more regular role on PH. Watch this space!

 



CITROEN ZX 16V
Engine:
1,998cc 4-cyl
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Power (hp): 152@6500rpm
Torque(lb ft): 137@3500rpm
MPG: 28.3mpg
CO2: N/A
First registered: 1993
Recorded mileage: 38,000
Price new: £14,995
Yours for: £2,375


See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

Dr Z

Original Poster:

3,396 posts

171 months

Monday 4th February 2013
quotequote all
Brilliant car! I wish I had this one than the 1.9 TD, although not complaining with the fuel consumption. smile

Dr Z

Original Poster:

3,396 posts

171 months

Monday 4th February 2013
quotequote all
RichardD said:
Regarding your car, you could do better if you change the TD to a TV wink (Turbo diesel -> TurboVeg, if the fuel pump would allow). Then turn the boost up. (My supa-shed TurboD has peak torque at what seems like 3k revs!)
I considered it when I was doing 110 miles a day for a year, but then I was skint and my car didn't have the 'correct' pump. Peak torque at 3k? My TD it feels like the boost comes on at 2.5k and ends at about 3.8k. It sits at 2.8k @70mph so instant response for motorway overtaking... The thing loves Shell V-power diesel. It feels like you get an instant re-map with a much stronger top-end.


These cars do 'feel' so light compared to modern hatches/cars. My TD gets washed about in a strong cross wind on the motorway! But great to throw about, I don't know if the 16v is 'stiffer' handling wise, but my TD has quite noticeable body roll and the steering rack that is not that quick (but this is after driving a Porsche 944, so probably not fair to the car).

Dr Z

Original Poster:

3,396 posts

171 months

Monday 4th February 2013
quotequote all
A ZX being thrown about enthusiastically...



Looks identical to mine (except the police stickers and paraphernalia, of course). biggrin


Edited by Dr Z on Monday 4th February 18:23

Dr Z

Original Poster:

3,396 posts

171 months

Tuesday 5th February 2013
quotequote all
S10GTA said:
I can't find the link, but it was on eBay. Maybe it was 120k, but sometimes a lack of miles can be a bad thing.
As long as it is maintained properly and regularly, I wouldn't have a problem with this one. Also it should have been driven as intended. None of this "gentle motorway miles" rubbish. Then, I'd be wary.

I bought my 1.9 D-Turbo couple of years back for £500 when it had 67k odd miles on the clock. Now it has 93k odd. Some would say that's 'barely run-in' for a 1.9TD, but it did have a fair bit spent on it (in servicing and repair) during this time and also driven properly, so any faults that are likely to occur, comes to the surface rather than festering underneath and the minute someone drives is enthusiastically, it starts to fall apart.

Edited by Dr Z on Tuesday 5th February 15:46

Dr Z

Original Poster:

3,396 posts

171 months

Saturday 9th February 2013
quotequote all
vsonix said:
Sounds like it could do with a suspension refresh tbh, is it still on its original springs & dampers?
You are right, it could do with some front suspension refresh. Planning to do that next.