Do you need anything more than a 320d?

Do you need anything more than a 320d?

Author
Discussion

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Tuesday 23rd June 2015
quotequote all
Apologies if repost...

http://youtu.be/zKrXFTL_6pw

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Tuesday 23rd June 2015
quotequote all
Robm77s thread...

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
dme123 said:
I'd agree with this. Also a 3 series can be cramped in the back and if you have three kids you've got a problem.

Do you need anything more than a 530d though? ;-)
Yes! You need an M5 smile

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
(I'm not sure how CH got 43, but I've just done a 2,000 mile jaunt around Europe and averaged 53mpg, and we weren't hanging around! I assume the new one is less economical).
Really? Did you only watch part's of the video? Perhaps something to do with the car having 3 people at least, loads of luggage and accelerating from 90mph to 130-140mph!

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
Sorry, I explained the above in more detail earlier in the thread. Just to recap, we were two up, loaded to the rafters (boot and back seats) and cruising at 85-90mph out of Germany and around 100-120mph in Germany, plus alpine roads at our destination. I expected less from Harris experimenting with the car and having a bit more weight, but I was surprised it was quite so different. My assumption that the newer one is less economical is also based on a poster who said his wife's one is averaging 43 as well.
I very much doubt the newer car is less economical!

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
You're getting a bit confused there, both about the electronic lag/latency and the turbo lag. DBW doesn't automatically mean a throttle lag; my 2-Eleven has DBW and no lag (as do most racing cars these days), as does my 320d. It's DBW with modern petrol BMWs that's the problem, apart from the M3. I was only chatting yesterday to a poster on another thread who can't stand the DBW latency with the petrol engines - it's a common thing that puts people off the non-M petrol models. As for turbo lag; that's completely non-existent in the sort of driving I do where the revs are kept up - you only get it if you're off the throttle for a period and suddenly demand lots of power, for example crawling in traffic and then gunning it onto a roundabout, or decelerating for ages and then coming onto the throttle.

I've taken the time to explain my my genuine reasons - if you don't believe it then so be it, but don't tell me that I'm making feeble excuses, especially not when a 330i will do 35-40mpg and petrol is cheaper than diesel - do the maths! (or just believe me, after all I've owned 4 petrol straight six BMWs, I'm not exactly unfamiliar with the differences!).
Forget the maths!
What about the noise of a straight 6 v's diesel.

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
Remind me, Rob, why diesel cars don't have DBW throttle lag. I notice the lag in petrol cars but it seems to me to be even worse in diesels (perhaps because they are in general a bit less responsive and the lags all merge into one).
Cos it doesn't lag when you keep the Rev's up, rob says.

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
yonex said:
1. A pickup type thing to take stuff to the dump, Carry bikes etc
2. A lightweight fun car
3. A bruising middleweight.

Therefore M3, Caterham and Amarok.

That's all the cars I ever need smile
Excellent. I agree, perfect line up - I have the poverty version at the moment : M135i, Yaris 1.0 (!!!) and Qashcow.
I have 2/3 covered (although I would like my light car to be closer to 500kg’s) but I still need to own a defender to cover #1.

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Thursday 2nd July 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
I don't want a 330d. Never have done. Never will. I doubt I am alone in that!
I just never want a diesel!

Mike22233

Original Poster:

822 posts

111 months

Thursday 16th July 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Agreed.
It's a nippy car - more than fast enough for most people but no it's not fast not even close.

A fast car IMHO is greater than 300bhp/tonne and a top speed well in excess of 185mph.
How stupid. So radicals, lotus 2-11's, r500's or ariel atoms are not fast?