What is 555?

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all



Bring up a search in Google creates nothing? What on earth is 555?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all
They also sponsored BAR Honda in the 1999 F1 Championship.




anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all
Do 555 not sponsor anything modern then?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all
kambites said:
allroad one said:
Do 555 not sponsor anything modern then?
How many sports still allow cigarette branding?
Oh yeah.....

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all
simonr100 said:
kambites said:
I'd always wondered why the car was called the "22B", now I know. biggrin
That's the wrong reason - 22B came from the engine 2.2litres and the B was a reference to the Bilstein shocks.
So the whole coding thing was coincidental? I think it has some part in it too.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all
LordHaveMurci said:
Owned my classic scooby when I set my 1st email account up, has 555 in it, sad I know but I still use it nearly 20yrs later!
So SWRT was sponsored by your email address? wink

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
allroad one said:
simonr100 said:
kambites said:
I'd always wondered why the car was called the "22B", now I know. biggrin
That's the wrong reason - 22B came from the engine 2.2litres and the B was a reference to the Bilstein shocks.
So the whole coding thing was coincidental? I think it has some part in it too.
I bet they didn't end up with a 2.2L displacement by accident.
Obviously, but maybe the name 22B has something to do with 555? They probably named it 22B after the code and made it stand for the displacement and shocks.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
It's one fewer than 556 and one more than 554.

HTH...

Don't you know anything...?
Shut up bruvva u tiped your street name in wrong and couldn't notice the difference. You probably couldnt tell the difference between coke and weed u littel broncha wonka wink


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 27th July 2016
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
allroad one said:
What on earth is 555?
If you're 555 then I'm 666.



(Quite possibly the worst lyric in the history of music.)
If he's 555 and youre 666 then I'm 777.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
I have watched motorsport all my life at at no time did I see a cool F1 car or WRC car with tobacco advertising and run down to the shops for a packet of fags.

It is getting beyond a joke now when waiting to be served behind someone wanting to buy a pack with the man/lady looking behind the non branding pigeon holes trying to find the ones the customer wants.

Really are we this stupid as humans not to be able to make the choice ourselves?

If you go out to any pub there are more youngsters outside smoking so this advertising rubbish is not working.

If you tell people not to do something many will do it anyway to stick a finger up at the laws enforcing this rubbish.

Anyway rant over......

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
We should just turn this thread in to a Q&A about sponsors in motorsport

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Friday 29th July 2016
quotequote all
QuickQuack said:
Anti-smoking laws have worked to improve the health of the population already. Improvements in some of the more acute effects cigarette smoke (exacerbations in acute respiratory attack in asthmatics etc.) on health were observed as early as 2 months, large scale improvements on other health parameters within a year (premature births and asthma diagnoses in children), medium term effects (acute coronary events [agine, hearts attack] etc.) were seen within 5 years, and we will continue to see improvements on longer term effects of smoking (further improvements in coronary and peripheral artery diseases, strokes, lung, bladder and oropharangeal cancers etc.) over the next 5-10 years.

I'm afraid to say that we as humans really are that stupid. If advertising and sports sponsorship didn't work, nobody would be chucking large amounts of money at it. Commercial enterprises, be they tobacco companies or small businesses, don't spend money on advertising and sponsorship for alturistic reasons; every penny spent has an ROI (return on investment) assessment attached to it. The best marketing ploys work by making you purchase/use/recommend the item they're promoting while making you feel that you are not influenced by the advertising.
True tobacco companies would not sponsor if they were not making profit out of this but when out in a bar of pub the amount of youngsters smoking seems to have increased.

The only good thing "if they really are a healthy option" are the vapour cigarettes which are being uses a lot by these younger people in bars.

If it is true that cigarettes are selling less I would be delighted but the amount I have seen while out IMO is increasing.


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Friday 29th July 2016
quotequote all
battered said:
Yes we are that stupid.
Smoking has declined.
Smokers smoke less post ban than before.

No ranting required.
If this is the case it would be a great thing but personally speaking I am seeing more young people smoking cigarette or vapours.

There are more outside smoking then there is the the bar.

Hopefully the national statistics show this to not be the case.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Friday 29th July 2016
quotequote all
Good to see.

Must just be my bars.

Need to change biggrin