RE: Detroit '09: Dodge Circuit EV

RE: Detroit '09: Dodge Circuit EV

Monday 12th January 2009

Detroit '09: Dodge Circuit EV

Hard-charging Dodge Circuit is based on Lotus Europa


Haven't I seen you somewhere before?
Haven't I seen you somewhere before?
The Dodge Viper and Lotus Europa couldn’t be more different if they tried – but what would happen if they had a lovechild? Well, it might look something like this – the Dodge Circuit EV.

As the name suggests this is in fact an electric car and although the original concept was seen last year, Dodge has decided to give it more of a family face.

The new car has been unveiled at the Detroit Show and is obviously based around a Lotus Europa but is powered by a Tesla Roadster-style lithium-ion battery pack.

The car has a similar range of between 150 and 200 miles but could cost considerably less than the £90,000 Tesla. It is expected to go on sale in the US in 2010 and in the UK in 2011.




 

 

Author
Discussion

spoonoff

Original Poster:

361 posts

199 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
This is the equivalent of McDonalds trying to improve their image with vegetarians by setting a cow up in a luxury penthouse-barn, after painting it orange...

spoonoff

Original Poster:

361 posts

199 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
kambites said:
XitUp said:
andy_b said:
honest question.... why isn't Hydrogen the future?

andy
The laws of thermodynamics.
It takes way more energy to make hydrogen than you can get back from burning it or using it in a fuel cell.
Then you have the £billions that would be needed for new transportation and storage infrastructure.
I suppose that depends on how it's done. You don't need to transport or store much hydrogen if your electricity infrastructure if up to the load, you could generate it relatively locally.

I don't know how the total efficiency between going, for example, "fossil fuel -> electricity -> grid -> hydrogen -> electricity -> kinetic energy" compares to burning the fossil fuel in the car, but I could believe it if I was told that either was more efficient.

From memory of the other bits, you'd need electricity -> hydrogen -> electricity to be about 80% efficient in order for using hydrogen to be more efficient overall. I have no idea what the real figure is though.
Good post- this is why nuclear energy is the only real alternative at present, but the by products are not good. If they could crack nuclear fusion then that would provide virtually limitless, polution free energy.