Is it worth buying 944 Turbo to restore?

[hoegaardenruls]

On most days, I see a 944 Turbo that has been sat on a drive for as long as I remember (a few years) looking pretty sorry for itself, although from what I can see the other sills look sound, the bodywork looks OK other than some patches on the surface of the bonnet, and the leather interior seems quite tidy.

Not knowing the background of the car there is potentially the reason it was taken off the road in the first place, and refresh of brakes, tyres, etc to account for since its been laid up for so long. What's the likelihood of terminal failure of a major component on these such as engine, box or turbo, other than timing belt failure, and likely costs? There is a well known specialist named on the number plates, and although they hint at some maintenance before it was laid up, it doesn't confirm exact age, etc..

So would it be worth even considering, given current values and potential headaches, even with a big helping of man-maths and low purchase price?? So, potential money pit or worthwhile project?

[hoegaardenruls]

randlemarcus said:

220 or 250? The latter car is gorgeous when running well, so from a mechanical perspective, well worth it. Actual cold hard cash sums? Maybe not, but you will have rescued something special.

Not too sure on the exact model as it stands, as the plate doesn't give any clues to age, and it is missing a front bumper at the moment. I know its a potential money pit, although not as much as a 928 could be, but you're right about the satisfaction of having saved the car as they look pretty special on the road.

I'm partly hoping to put this thought to bed, but the temptation is there.

[hoegaardenruls]

Reading around the subject suggests its the 220, but might have to live out that fantasy and find out for sure.

Does the bigger turbo give the 250 much difference in character?

[hoegaardenruls]

Thanks for a very honest response, the later boost threshold was something I was curious about as a small turbo can have its benefits, and being an 80's turbo the 220 might feel a little more responsive - the reason for the question was having owned a Audi RS4, the 2.7T had better low-down torque in the S4 until both were moving (and different 3rd/4th ratios). I wouldn't be looking for headline figures, so the smaller turbo with a mild remap could be an attractive option. I have since established it is a 1986 car, so indeed a 220.

I'm assuming the more expensive parts might be gearbox and anything specific to the model?

I don't see this one moving anytime soon, but I can't help thinking this would be a way of having the contrast of an older Porsche alongside a 997, at a (possibly) reasonable cost..