GT3 people - can you explain...

GT3 people - can you explain...

Author
Discussion

timu23

Original Poster:

121 posts

220 months

Wednesday 24th January 2007
quotequote all
Why the prices of Mark 1 and Mark 2 GT3s are now so close.

It seems you can get a two or three year old Mark 2 in the high 40K mark. To my layman's eyes this seems a bit of a bargain.

Whereas Marks 1s are still very much in the early forties. So its a 4-5K difference between the two types.

Seems a very small difference considering the Marks 1s are now six to eight years old.

Is the Mark 1 really that much better?

Were they made in much smaller numbers?

timu23

Original Poster:

121 posts

220 months

Wednesday 24th January 2007
quotequote all
johnfm said:
Market forces. MK2 marginally better on paper (ie brakes, a bit more T|Q and HP). BUT, less MK1s were made and some people prefer the MK1 looks.

I think they're both great cars. I feel pretty lucky to have a MK1 in the garage.


Cheers John, I would feel very happy to have either in my garage as well

I just to me looks like the Mark IIs are mega value for money at the mo.

timu23

Original Poster:

121 posts

220 months

Wednesday 24th January 2007
quotequote all
Like I said they're both awesome machines and I'm not looking to cause a barny between Mark 1 and Mark 2 owners

Just interested in the reasons behind their comparative second-hand prices - they both seem bargains to me when you consider a specced 997 GT3 is not far off 90K.

I didn't realise that the Mark 1s were handbuilt by the racing department. That is impressive and certainly adds something to the legend.

timu23

Original Poster:

121 posts

220 months

Thursday 25th January 2007
quotequote all
So it seems, the 'bespokeness', looks and extra rarity of the Mark 1 are the defining factors.

With all the above in mind, the following looks just mega, mega value for money.

www.pistonheads.com/sales/118315.htm

Great colour too, IMO