Ferrari Mondial
Discussion
Quite interested in this car. Never had a Ferrari before so if anyone can tell me the joys & pains of owning one of these I will be forever grateful.
Car looks nice and clean (not seen it in the flesh yet) , however I know nothing about these so if anyone has any history on the car or knows of it please can you shed some light.
Many thanks
Car looks nice and clean (not seen it in the flesh yet) , however I know nothing about these so if anyone has any history on the car or knows of it please can you shed some light.
Many thanks
TVP993 said:
Quite interested in this car. Never had a Ferrari before so if anyone can tell me the joys & pains of owning one of these I will be forever grateful.
Car looks nice and clean (not seen it in the flesh yet) , however I know nothing about these so if anyone has any history on the car or knows of it please can you shed some light.
Many thanks
sorry forgot the link. http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3507201.htmCar looks nice and clean (not seen it in the flesh yet) , however I know nothing about these so if anyone has any history on the car or knows of it please can you shed some light.
Many thanks
AndrewW-G said:
Apart from the chassis which was mostly carried over (with modifications to the engine sub frame mounts) as the T didn’t have anything like the 348's almost unitarily constructed chassis
As I'm sure we could all agree, on a value for money basis, the 3.2 is the best bang for the buck, that fits the OP's requirements and if he were to get one that was almost at the upper age limit to import to OZ, he'd get one that was almost rust proofed
Thanks guys. I take it these things are rust buckets then?As I'm sure we could all agree, on a value for money basis, the 3.2 is the best bang for the buck, that fits the OP's requirements and if he were to get one that was almost at the upper age limit to import to OZ, he'd get one that was almost rust proofed
Not good.
Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff