Car & Driver Tests the Huracan
Discussion
0-60 in 2.5
10.4 @ 135.
I wasn't quite expecting it to be THAT quick.
Update: Added similar test for Aventador:
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2012-lamborghi...
Here's the Aventador in 2012 tested the same way by C&D. The pertinent stats:
0-60 in 3.0
0-100 in 6.4
Quarter mile - 10.9 @ 133 mph.
From here:http://www.germancarforum.com/community/threads/car-driver-lamborghini-huracan-lp610-4-test.51294/
10.4 @ 135.
I wasn't quite expecting it to be THAT quick.
Update: Added similar test for Aventador:
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2012-lamborghi...
Here's the Aventador in 2012 tested the same way by C&D. The pertinent stats:
0-60 in 3.0
0-100 in 6.4
Quarter mile - 10.9 @ 133 mph.
From here:http://www.germancarforum.com/community/threads/car-driver-lamborghini-huracan-lp610-4-test.51294/
Edited by mpusch on Tuesday 5th August 19:27
GusB said:
That does surprise me as drove one for 18 laps at Goodwood and whilst it felt quicker than the Avantador it did not feel as fast as those numbers suggest it is... maybe they had a "really good" one to test...
Lovely car btw.
GusB
Assuming these numbers are correct (though C&D is pretty respectable), then I'd imagine the way it gets the quarter mile number is just through a great launch. I'd think from a roll at pretty much any speed it'd give up some acceleration numbers to the Aventador and such.Lovely car btw.
GusB
I hope those numbers are right, but I understand (and have some of my own) skepticism.
Edited by mpusch on Monday 4th August 20:55
roygarth said:
Don't all manufacturers send 'really good' ones to all the magazines?!
That is what I think... It was really quick, however did not feel so much quicker than a 458 / F12 / 599 as these number suggest, even when launching from a 0 - c120mph. It was a great car, however sounding old I would be interested in one if they were a little more practical...
GusB
gregf40 said:
A GTR can do that...it's the 0-100 time I struggle to believe!
For the power/weight is is an amzing time. Still one second behind the 2wd P1 though.Looks to be down to the 4*4 traction at lower speeds and a very close ratio fast shifting gearbox - the car can't even do 100mph in 3rd.
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2012-lamborghi...
Here's the Aventador in 2012 tested the same way by C&D. The pertinent stats:
0-60 in 3.0
0-100 in 6.4
Quarter mile - 10.9 @ 133 mph.
Here's the Aventador in 2012 tested the same way by C&D. The pertinent stats:
0-60 in 3.0
0-100 in 6.4
Quarter mile - 10.9 @ 133 mph.
An incredible set of acceleration figures and embarrassingly (for Lamborghini) much quicker than their halo model Aventador.
Even the 1.9 second 30 -50mph time in top is amazing, that's a gear that'll pull 200+mph.......
And for those who suggest that the test cars are 'optimised' there's not that much you can do a normally aspirated 5.2 litre engine that pushes out 115bhp per litre to make it faster.
Even the 1.9 second 30 -50mph time in top is amazing, that's a gear that'll pull 200+mph.......
And for those who suggest that the test cars are 'optimised' there's not that much you can do a normally aspirated 5.2 litre engine that pushes out 115bhp per litre to make it faster.
Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff