What makes a good rally engine?

What makes a good rally engine?

Author
Discussion

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
"Mechanics dream": I was asked to build a historic rally mini.

Happy and hurray and... well... I am lost in the wilderness.

I have some ideas but would like to hear Your opinion. What makes a good rally engine?

How to build a good 998 rally engine (post 70 mkIII mini)?

Greatefull on any comment.

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Why 998? The driver is a beginner, and easier to achieve any success in the under 1000 class than in the 1000-1400.

I have to keep the original engine (even A+ is prohibited).

I have the homologation sheet and studied the J and K appendixes soo I think I see my rules.



camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I have some options for the gearbox, soo I can mach it with the engine.

I need to know what are the most important "rules" of the engine. Reliability? Power? Torque? Wide power band? What peak rpm to look for?

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Friday 25th November 2011
quotequote all
Thanks for the input soo far.

I have a "donor" engine I would like to alter to suit the rally needs.

It is a Mini Se7en engine done by a well-known specalist.

The spec of the engine as far as I seen now:
- Omega forged (?) pistons with not very high compression (not measured yet).
- MG Metro cam (252in/268ex)
- MED crankshaft lightened quite well
- lightened std conrods
- 12G940 head well modified with 31mm ex and 36mm in valves - done by a very good specialist
- bronze guides
- 1.3 forged rockers
- very light flywheel
- sintered clutch
- grey diapragm

The engine did 97Bhps. Redline at 8K.

I will put the engine on a SC/CR box with the BMC ST ratios and a 4.57:1 sc/crosspin diff.
I would like to modify it to suit a rally car. No matter if we sacrifise some of the peak power. I dont think we will use it at 8k on a rally. I plan to get the switclight set somewhere at 7300.

Things I was thinking about to do:
- replace the head with a more mundane item (rimflow 31mm, 35,6mm and only port it slightly - in order to get a decent idle and some low-down torque.
- replace the sintered clutch with a normal heavy duty item, and also replace the diapragm with a normal 1275S item (green?).
- Is it mandatory to replace the flywheel with a heavier one?
- any other ideas?

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Friday 25th November 2011
quotequote all
Okay Master!

You are maybe one of a dozen species on this bare planet whom I take every lesson as rockhard fact.
But may I try to tell You my "whys"? And You will tell me why I think wrong smile.

Soo.

The ports of the head is huge. Realy. It is much bigger then I ever seen. Even on well modified 1380 engines.
I was told that theese race engines idle around 2k. The cam is mild - I accept. Soo I thought that the gas speed in the ports at low prm is low, soo the fuel atomisation would suffer. This engine was built for track racing (Mini Se7en), soo no real problem with idle/low torque.

The same applies to the flywheel: it was built to rev high. But idling speed may suffer, and also the negine may be hesitant to pick up reves from low rpm. But I would be happy to use the light flywheel, just would like to make this engine idle at around 1000.

Padavan is waiting for the force-transition biggrin.

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Friday 25th November 2011
quotequote all
The original cam choice was due to class limits (use of this cam is mandatory).

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Friday 25th November 2011
quotequote all
I must rebuild the engine as
a, this block does not meet the homologation of our class
b, on one cylinder bore I found a nasty casting error, which I would never accept in a race engine
c, the tranfer gear failed apperently on its first race, soo it needs sorting out.

Thus if I have to rebuild the negine, I would like to make the changes which looks promissing.

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
As I told before, I intend to move the engine containment into a homologed block. It is mostly straight forevard. I think the best would be to copy the clearances of the original engine.

Though some controll may not hurt.

Soo I measured the clearances.

Piston-bore clearance - 0.09-0.1mm. The piston is forged. Do I realy need such a huge clearance?
Piston ring end gaps: 0.6-0.8mm. Same question here.
Crankshaft main bearing clearance 0.03mm.
Big end bearing clearance 0.04mm.
Valve-deck clearance 0.15-0.2mm, plus head gasket (app. 0.8mm).
Valve stem-guide clearance with bronze guides 0.7-0.9mm.

The honing pattern is "shallow", maybe 25-30degree and quite fine. Is it ok?

Were do I need to take care if I am building a high reving engine?

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
Mainstrap only the 2 bolt type, using the original main bearing housing.
No belt conversion allowed. No roller rockers. Only "S" forged rockers homologed with 1.3 ratio.

camelotr

Original Poster:

570 posts

168 months

Thursday 1st December 2011
quotequote all
There are no mini specialists in my country.

I contacted Omega Piston for information, but they could not help. I was told that "depends on application" smile.

OK. Although they suggested the clearance between 0.05-0.1mm.

The engine was originaly built for Mini Se7en track racing, to be reved up to 8k. I convert it to rally use, and will set the rev limit to 7200.

Soo I decided to reduce the piston-bore clearance to 0.07mm.

I am still not sure about the honing patern. Call me a foul, but after my last engine, which developed that nasty smoke for the sole reason of a bad honing, I am overly keen on this.

The honing of the original race block was very shallow - 25-30 degrees at max, with a very fine surface. Shall I order my machinist to duplicate this, or shall I go for a "normal" 45 degrees pattern?