520d - older car, likely problems?

520d - older car, likely problems?

Author
Discussion

xcentric

Original Poster:

722 posts

220 months

Thursday 16th February 2017
quotequote all
looking at buying a 520d, ~100k miles, ~10 years old, ~£5-6k - are there any major points to look out for on these?
good service history a must, I know.....

xcentric

Original Poster:

722 posts

220 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
thanks.

The timing chain is an interesting (and worrying one) - it's just relevant for the cars I'm looking at (~100k miles, 2007-8) - the earlier engine is much less economic, so prefer this one. Clearly regular oil changes are helpful, but proof of that is hard to come by. Can see that getting figures of actual problems are hard too, but as an owner of a Porsche that had an IMS go, i'd rather not buy into another weakly engineered engine (and its the diesel that I'm looking at).

I'm guessing cars with fixed/replaced timing belts will be clearly advertised as such, as it seems too expensive to simply ask a dealer to do before buying one.....

Do they also have the swirl flap problem?



xcentric

Original Poster:

722 posts

220 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
and if the recall has been done. will it be shown in the service book clearly? I'm happy enough if it's been sorted but it does seem that there have been a spate of failures, so its unclear whether many we actually recalled and sorted.

xcentric

Original Poster:

722 posts

220 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
smashy said:
xcentric this is by far the best thread on this http://www.babybmw.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=72191

As for me buddy id walk away my 57 plate 105k miles scrapped and BMW couldnt have cared less.What nobody ever mentions is this. when it goes you lose all power thankfully I was not on the outside lane of a motorway or anywhere on a motorway to be fair.
thanks - interesting thread. So, if I find one that did have the QE work done and it's documented, then it's probably ok. If not documented or not done, then it's not.

So it does open it up as an option again to me (had partially ruled it out)..... might look at the 2.5d too, and broaden search to other marquees as well, however.....

xcentric

Original Poster:

722 posts

220 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
kurt535 said:
don't. bmw 4 pots are shyte. stretch to the 530d and sleep at night.
That's quite strong - why do you say that?! Many people like them. Agree the 530 is quicker, but I don't need this car to be my quick one - just need a comfy commuter with ok performance and decent reliability (hence the thread) and mpg......

xcentric

Original Poster:

722 posts

220 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2017
quotequote all
hum hum de hum.

So, 520d is out - too many horror stories.

530d is in - good mix of power and economy. But, at the £5-7k, am looking at 80-130k miles, 2004-2007ish (pre LCI). Happy enough with spec levels and performance/economy mix, but wondering how likely it is I'll be hit with big bills. On one hand, seeing quite a few cars with nearly 200k miles shows they do get there, but also if it dumps me with turbo, manifold, clutch, and iDrive bills all in a few months I'll be fed up.

So, how much of a risk do you reckon it will be? Or will it be flowers and grass and long endless summer sun fun.....

xcentric

Original Poster:

722 posts

220 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2017
quotequote all
interestingly, there's not a vast difference in price between them, as far as i can see - they seem to have levelled off at about the same value - but I'll have another look around.....