RE: New Yamaha R1 - inside line

RE: New Yamaha R1 - inside line

Friday 6th February 2015

New Yamaha R1 - inside line

PH2 speaks to Hideki Fujiwara, the Project Leader behind the new YZF-R1 and YZF-R1M



Hideki Fujiwara has a long history with the YZF-R1 and was part of the design team who developed the original 1998 model. With Kunihiko Miwa as Project Leader, Fujiwara helped design the R1's engine, which was the first motorcycle motor to have a vertically stacked gearbox. For the 2004 'underseat pipe' update, Fujiwara was the Project Chief for the new 998cc motor and he also designed the 2009 cross-plane R1 motor. For the 2015 YZF-R1 and YZF-R1M he was promoted to overall Project Leader, the first time he has been given the task. He didn't rest on his laurels...

Fujiwara is commendably upfront about R1
Fujiwara is commendably upfront about R1
What were the design targets for the new R1?
"The new R1 was simply designed to be the fastest bike around a track. This is different to previous generations of the R1, which were more road targeted than track specific."

So why the change in focus?
"Riders have changed their habits, people are less likely to ride fast on the streets as speeding regulations are now stricter. To fully enjoy a sports bike you need to be on a circuit, so we designed the R1 to be at its very best on track."

Why did you totally redesign the cross-plane engine?
"Two reasons - the first was to release more power output and the other to reduce its weight. The new motor is 4kg lighter than the old engine and weighs only around 60kg in total."

So why give it a bigger bore and replace the bucket and shim valve system for rockers?
"The rev limit is far higher on the new engine and the rocker system reduces the weight under the valve's spring, which means more power and better reliability. The rev limit has increased by 1,000rpm and the power is up from 182hp to 200hp. The torque is also increase quite considerably thanks to the larger valves."

Cross-plane engine significantly redesigned
Cross-plane engine significantly redesigned
Traditionally the R1 was designed under the philosophy jinba ittai (the same 'horse and rider as one' ideology also namechecked by Mazda for the MX-5). Previously this was done through engineering techniques, however the new R1 appears to use electronics instead. Is this the new jinba ittai?
"Yes. I wanted to make the new R1 more compact while still retaining very good handling. However by shortening the R1's length stability became an issue and so to counteract this instability we used electronics."

Could you have built this R1 without electronics?
"Yes, but whether riders could enjoy it would have been a very different story. It would possibly have been a little too exciting..."

Is a greater reliance on electronic aids how sports bike development is going?
"Yes, generally speaking you can create something very aggressive and powerful and then control it with electronics."

More revs, more power, more fun
More revs, more power, more fun
Is there a limit to horsepower, is 200hp enough for a road motorcycle?
"In the current circumstances, for a road legal bike, I feel 200hp is enough."

How involved was the MotoGP team in the R1's development?
"We have an internal system at Yamaha where engineers move between projects to challenge themselves. Two of the R1's engineers worked for three years on the YZR-M1 MotoGP project, mainly on the chassis side of the bike's development."

So is the MotoGP influence mainly related to the chassis?
"No, it is pretty similarly divided between the chassis and engine."

How many years ago was the R1's electronics package being used in MotoGP?
"What is on the R1 is very close to what the YZR-M1 is currently using."

Rossi has had a hand in chassis tuning
Rossi has had a hand in chassis tuning
Why develop the YZF-R1M? Surely the YZF-R1 was enough?
"Two reasons - one is that I believe that adding electronic suspension and a carbon fairing makes the bike much closer to the M1 that the customer has dreamed of owning. Secondly, the R1M is aimed far more towards those skilled riders who really want to enjoy it on track and have the skills to push it to its limits."

The electronic suspension on the YZF-R1M isn't allowed in MotoGP, do you find it odd that this road bike is more advanced than your cutting edge racer?
"You are correct, it is higher spec than Valentino's M1! We have a very skilled test rider who is able to assess how good the suspension is and we asked him 'which would you rather have?' He said on a circuit the electronic suspension was better than standard suspension, so we fitted it!"

Speaking of test riders, how much input did Valentino Rossi really have into the R1's development?
"Far more than on previous R1 models. He rode an early prototype and demanded that we give it the same feeling he gets from his YZR-M1's front end! This advice really helped us. He said he wanted the bike's handling to have a certain feeling that we engineered into the chassis."

New R1 is aimed squarely at track usage
New R1 is aimed squarely at track usage
At the Milan show we have seen a new Ducati Panigale 1299, BMW S1000RR, Honda RC213V-S and Yamaha YZF-R1. After a dip in sales, do you see the age of the sports bike returning?
"I hope so! A big growth in sports bike sales will stimulate the global bike market. The role of a sports bike is to create excitement amongst riders and although they may not actually buy a sports bike, they will be inspired by them to walk into a showroom. Yamaha wants to be the one to stimulate the whole sports bike market!"

What does this mean for the YZF-R6? Are Supersport sales dead?
"It is very difficult for me to answer this... I can only say I hope the 600cc market follows the litre bike market's revival..."

 

Author
Discussion

Slickhillsy

Original Poster:

1,772 posts

144 months

Friday 6th February 2015
quotequote all
Just hope this thing is better to ride than it is to look at.... Fair play to Yamaha for pushing the design boundaries though. Think this will be a bit of a Marmite bike TBH, much like the Ducati 999.

Slickhillsy

Original Poster:

1,772 posts

144 months

Friday 6th February 2015
quotequote all
Thrugglevalve said:
bass gt3 said:
And a race team will tell the truth?? Give me a call when it happens!
FACT is DJ numbers, which are the ones bandied about are as useless as saying you get paid a zillion quarks a trimester.
Whilst the DJ dyno might be measuring 200 somethings, they ain't Horsepower as defined by the scientific method. So to start wittering on about 200 BHP at the crank or at the wheel is self delusional.
Oh, and if you really think a Superbike only looses 12 BHP through the powertrain you are away with the fairies.
Motorcycle.com Superbike test 2010.

A - hem... can I just overlay my Desmo chart on this please? :-)

Slickhillsy

Original Poster:

1,772 posts

144 months

Friday 6th February 2015
quotequote all
Lol... woohoo