Google Chrome Browser

Author
Discussion

_Lee_

Original Poster:

7,520 posts

243 months

Tuesday 2nd September 2008
quotequote all
This looks interesting. I hope Mozilla/Opera survive the google onslaught though.

TheRegister said:
Google is releasing an open source browser called Google Chrome which it promises will be small, fast and stable.
Available for download shortly, the tabbed browser is explained in a 38 page comic by Scott McCloud. The comic explains that browsers are now very different from when first introduced - they are used for running web applications rather than just rendering pages.

Tabs will be central to Chrome and will be moveable from window to window.
The browser will be multi-threaded - so separate tabs will run as separate processes.*
The URL window will include autocomplete - but only to pages you've actually typed into the address bar before and not to the specific page. Opening a new window will show you the nine pages you visit most often, and the four sites you search on most often, rather than a home page.
Chrome will have an incognito porn mode - a window where none of your browsing history is recorded and cookies are deleted when the window is shut.
To stop malware processes are sandboxed - they cannot write files to your hard drive or read your documents. Chrome will get updates of phishing sites and malware attacks so browsers will get a warning if they go to a flagged site.
Chrome will include a task manager for each tab so you can see what resources are being used by individual pages.
The development team thanked Mozilla and Web Kit for their contribution.
The Windows version launches in 100 countries today, and Mac and Linux versions will follow soon.
The comic strip that explains the browser design http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/#

_Lee_

Original Poster:

7,520 posts

243 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
pdV6 said:
Mr Will said:
Just fired it up for testing here and have not used it enough to form a definate view yet, but my first outstanding impression is that it is really effing fast (on PH on my machine at least)
Funnily enough, PH seems to run a lot slower for me on Chrome as opposed to FF3.

I appreciate the under-the-bonnet stuff, but the slower performance and lack of add-ons (I juat can't live without mouse gestures now!) mean I'll be sticking to FF for now.
Thats interesting.

Chrome is blimmin' quick on my machine.

It's way faster than FF or Opera.

I like the simple design and think I will stick with this.

_Lee_

Original Poster:

7,520 posts

243 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
onlynik said:
The Register said:
Astute Reg readers have pointed out a Chrome condition of service that effectively lets Google use any of your copyrighted material posted to the web via Chrome without paying you a cent.

Here's the relevant section 11.1 of the Chrome EULA:

11. Content licence from you

11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights that you already hold in Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content, you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services. This licence is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.


Granting Google 'a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content that you submit, post or display on or through' Chrome is coming it rich.

Suppose Google does this to material you have posted that's not yours? No problem. It has a get-out-of-jail card signed by you in section 11.4 of the EULA:

11.4 You confirm and warrant to Google that you have all the rights, power and authority necessary to grant the above licence.

But you may be posting material via Chrome to your employer's site and it owns the copyright of anything you create in work time. What then if Google adapts, modifies and distributes it? Your fan has brown stuff all over it but none of it sticks to Google.

Back in 2001, El Reg first revealed how Microsoft's new single sign-on Passport, used for all its web services including Hotmail, also appeared to grab your intellectual property. Microsoft issued a reworded Terms of Use a few days later. Similar land-grabs have been attempted other operators including MySpace, amongst others.

Copyright-sensitive sysadms may banish Chrome from their networks because of this. Google's been asked how it fits in with its general 'Do no evil' ethic but wasn't immediately able to respond - because they're not in their office yet.®
Unistalled now.

Edited by onlynik on Wednesday 3rd September 17:25
I don't see how's thats relevant unless the browser is used internally in a company and displays company information?

To a home user, what does it matter?

_Lee_

Original Poster:

7,520 posts

243 months

Thursday 4th September 2008
quotequote all
Spam said:
Ok, I've been trying to use this for a day now whilst experimenting with other browsers

Some annoying points...

If you scroll down using your mouse wheel it wont scroll up the page again you have to use the bar on the right!!

It keeps asking me to install flash on every fking page!! I install it then go to the another page and it does it again.

A key example is this site and youtube. I can't watch any videos on YouTube as it asks for a flash player...So I install it again and it still wont accept it.

I love the basic, easy design but some things are beginnning to fk me off!!
I don't have either of those problems.

But then, it is a beta so there will be plenty of bugs in there for a while.