RE: Tesco launches high octane fuel
Discussion
This is 95% petrol, 5% bioethanol. See what's been done at le Mans and BTCC with 95% bioethanol in Energy Efficient Motor Sport at www.eemsonline.co.uk/
Good to see that on a performance car (the Scooby) that the horsepower and torque gains in percentage terms outweighed the higher price of the Optimax - I'll be sticking to that from now on, as my car has never got on with any 97 fuels too well.
Mind you '95 is louder on the overrun I find
Just a shame they didn't include Tesco's 99 octan stuff - hopefully EVO will though.
Mind you '95 is louder on the overrun I find
Just a shame they didn't include Tesco's 99 octan stuff - hopefully EVO will though.
lap_time said:
Japan have been using 100-octane fuel for quite some time now.
As have the Germans.
In fact, I was chatting with a petrol station attendant near Nurnberg, and
he says most of the major German chains of petrol stations have
stopped sellimg 98 octane, and now sell 100 octane.
Just as 98 octane gets popular in UK.
Ok, I'm confused.....
Is the only benefit of a higher octane rating the resistance to auto-igntion?
If so, it strikes me that any car without a knock sensor should see no improvement. Surely you'll have fixed AFR and spark timing for a given engine speed and load based on what the manufacturer or tuner belived was safe. If you've got a closed loop knock sensor then you can advance it to the point where detonation starts to occur, but if not you're stuck with fixed values intended to be safe for that speed and load under all conditions (maybe the ECUs have an open-loop knock strategy which adapts for coolant temperature, MAP etc, but this still would have to have a 'safety factor' to guarantee stable combustion, unless you've got a knock sensor of some description)
If you've got a very high (geometric) compression ratio or forced induction it might be that your car is better off running with higher octane fuel, but again without a knock sensor, the car cannot adapt to it. Maybe the answer is that more modern cars have knock sensors than I thought (a far cry from my carburettor/distributor 80s lump!). Or maybe the fuels have other performance benefits (greater calorific value, better atomisation)?
Is the only benefit of a higher octane rating the resistance to auto-igntion?
If so, it strikes me that any car without a knock sensor should see no improvement. Surely you'll have fixed AFR and spark timing for a given engine speed and load based on what the manufacturer or tuner belived was safe. If you've got a closed loop knock sensor then you can advance it to the point where detonation starts to occur, but if not you're stuck with fixed values intended to be safe for that speed and load under all conditions (maybe the ECUs have an open-loop knock strategy which adapts for coolant temperature, MAP etc, but this still would have to have a 'safety factor' to guarantee stable combustion, unless you've got a knock sensor of some description)
If you've got a very high (geometric) compression ratio or forced induction it might be that your car is better off running with higher octane fuel, but again without a knock sensor, the car cannot adapt to it. Maybe the answer is that more modern cars have knock sensors than I thought (a far cry from my carburettor/distributor 80s lump!). Or maybe the fuels have other performance benefits (greater calorific value, better atomisation)?
I watched Fifth Gear last night - with the comparison of different petrol brands. The used 3 cars and 3 types of petrol...
Cars: Renault Clio (1.2/1.4?)
Golf GTI (2.0 Turbo)
Impreza WRX STI
Fuels: Normal Unleaded (95 RON - brand not specified?)
BP Ultimate Unleaded (97 RON)
Shell Optimax (98 RON)
Mearuring BHP figures on a chassis dynamometer (bolted to the 2 or 4 driven hubs) they found the following....
Renault Clio - gave the same bhp on all 3 fuels (82bhp IIRC)
Golf GTI - Shell gave 5bhp more than UL, BP gave 2bhp more than UL.
WRX STI - Shell gave 15bhp more than UL, BP gave 8bhp more than UL.
Finally they tested the torque figures of the WRX. Shell was 15 Nm(IIRC) ahead of BP, which was a minor increase over normal.
Their conclusion was that higher RON fuels are only worth the money if your car can adapt to it (knock sensors etc). Probably only worth it for high performance cars - economy cars better sticking to normal UL.
NOTE: I had a 2 year old jumping on me for half the programme - so my figures will not be 100% exact - but good enough for comparison!
>> Edited by pallison on Tuesday 15th November 12:41
Cars: Renault Clio (1.2/1.4?)
Golf GTI (2.0 Turbo)
Impreza WRX STI
Fuels: Normal Unleaded (95 RON - brand not specified?)
BP Ultimate Unleaded (97 RON)
Shell Optimax (98 RON)
Mearuring BHP figures on a chassis dynamometer (bolted to the 2 or 4 driven hubs) they found the following....
Renault Clio - gave the same bhp on all 3 fuels (82bhp IIRC)
Golf GTI - Shell gave 5bhp more than UL, BP gave 2bhp more than UL.
WRX STI - Shell gave 15bhp more than UL, BP gave 8bhp more than UL.
Finally they tested the torque figures of the WRX. Shell was 15 Nm(IIRC) ahead of BP, which was a minor increase over normal.
Their conclusion was that higher RON fuels are only worth the money if your car can adapt to it (knock sensors etc). Probably only worth it for high performance cars - economy cars better sticking to normal UL.
NOTE: I had a 2 year old jumping on me for half the programme - so my figures will not be 100% exact - but good enough for comparison!
>> Edited by pallison on Tuesday 15th November 12:41
Hmmmm... seems the PH test was about as unscientific as they come - 'we thrashed four (non-identical) cars around a track with no measuring devices and came to a conclusion'...
The 5th Gear test last night was interesting (and a bit more scientific), shame it didn't include Tesco 99 in the comparison.
Does the Tesco stuff have engine-cleaning properties as claimed by Optimax (and proved to some degree in an evo test some time ago)?
The 5th Gear test last night was interesting (and a bit more scientific), shame it didn't include Tesco 99 in the comparison.
Does the Tesco stuff have engine-cleaning properties as claimed by Optimax (and proved to some degree in an evo test some time ago)?
I can't get to a phone just now, but I'm sure the Tesco press office will be able to give more details on the 99 RON fuel.
Their telephone number is 01992 644 645. I got it from the following petrol press release (about 99 RON and bioethanol)
www.tescocorporate.com/page.aspx?pointerid=6CAE6067F10C4171B40512BC9F0454E8
Their telephone number is 01992 644 645. I got it from the following petrol press release (about 99 RON and bioethanol)
www.tescocorporate.com/page.aspx?pointerid=6CAE6067F10C4171B40512BC9F0454E8
Gassing Station | Motoring News | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff