Something strange just happened... Linglong weren't crap!

Something strange just happened... Linglong weren't crap!

Author
Discussion

jon-

Original Poster:

16,511 posts

217 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Due to other commitments I've been a little behind on tyre tests but am now finally catching up.

Last night I was going through a Finnish tyre test looking primarily at ECO tyres, all the usual contenders were included (Goodyear EfficientGrip, Pirelli CINTURATO P7, Michelin Energy Saver etc) along with a few budgets.

Nothing strange so far.

There were 15 tyres tested in total and in 11th place, and ahead of more notable tyres like the Michelin Energy Saver, BFGoodrich gGrip was none other than the new Linglong Green Max.

Needless to say I doubled checked the translation software hadn't done something very strange but it was actually true. The new Linglong isn't an extreme ditch finder like the previous tyres!

It must be a warm day in hell.

Fortunately Sunny restored the balance, with the translation roughly coming out as "We wouldn't use these tyres if they were given away for free" hehe

jon-

Original Poster:

16,511 posts

217 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
At least it didn't turn into a premium vs budget tyre debate hehe

Matt UK

17,754 posts

201 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
I know nothing of Linglong beyond their www reputation.

Are they part of one of the big groups like Falken?

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

158 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
jon- said:
Last night I was going through a Finnish tyre test looking primarily at ECO tyres,
So what you're saying is, when compared to tyres actually designed to grip less to save fuel, the inherent lack of grip from linglongs is less noticeable?

Hardly a ringing endorsement to PH types is it? biggrin

VeeFour

3,339 posts

163 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
The results:

Place Brand Model Score




1 Continental ContiPremiumContact 2 9.5
2 Nokian Hakka V 8,8
3 Vredestein Sportrac 3 8,5
4 Goodyear EfficientGrip 8,2
5 Pirelli Cinturato P7 8,2
6 Nokian Hakka Green 8
7 Dunlop SP Sport Fastresponse 7,8
8 Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia 7,5
9 Barum Bravuris 2 7,4
10 Hankook Ventus Prime 2 7,4
11 Linglong Green-Max 7,4
12 BF Goodrich g-Grip 7,2
13 Michelin Energy Saver 7,2
14 Sava Intensa HP 6,6
15 Sunny SN3630 4,6

OK, so they're ahead of the real ste, but still finished 11 out of 15 tyres tested...

Comments:

11th: Linglong Green Max
Total: 84.4 / Dry: 24 / Wet: 30 / Rolling Resistance: 7 / Comfort: 8 / Noise: 8 / Overall: 7.4
Positive: Easy to drive
Negative: Average wet braking
Overall: The Linglong Green Max is the first time a Linglong tyre has scored reasonably in a group test. Its wet braking is rather modest but lateral grip good in the wet and dry. Slightly let down by its rolling resistance.

Still ste in the wet, which is where they've traditionally always been ste - and also criticised for rolling resistance - which is surely defeating the point of an 'eco' tyre?

EDLT

15,421 posts

207 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Apart from the Sunnys, the results are quite close.

jon-

Original Poster:

16,511 posts

217 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
VeeFour said:
OK, so they're ahead of the real ste, but still finished 11 out of 15 tyres tested...
I'm not saying they're the best tyre you can buy, but the score overall (7.4) wasn't that bad considering. They'd usually pull a score like the Sunny.